Subject(s)
Domestic Violence/psychology , Forensic Psychiatry , Homicide/psychology , Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Spouses/statistics & numerical data , Dependent Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Dependent Personality Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Disorders/psychology , Personality Inventory , Rage , Risk Factors , Sex DistributionABSTRACT
Previous research on subtypes of batterers has revealed at least two distinct types of batterers. One group (Type 1) demonstrates suppressed physiological responding during conflicts with their wives, tends to use violence in nonintimate relationships and manifests Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-II) scale elevations on the Antisocial and Aggressive-Sadistic scales. The second group (Type 2) manifests violence in the intimate relationship only and reports dysphoria. The current study extends our knowledge of these two groups by using a cluster analysis to assess personality disorder and relating the results to each group's attachment style, anger, trauma scores, and scores on a self-report of Borderline Personality Organization (BPO). An instrumental group (Type 1) showed an Antisocial-Narcissistic-Aggressive profile on the MCMI-II and reported more severe physical violence. An impulsive group (Type 2) showed a mixed profile on the MCMI-II with Passive-Aggressive, Borderline, and Avoidant elevations, high scores on a self-report of BPO, higher chronic anger, and Fearful attachment. Both types of abusive men reported a Preoccupied attachment style, but only the Impulsive men reported an accompanying Fearful attachment style.
Subject(s)
Battered Women , Domestic Violence , Personality Disorders , Adult , Borderline Personality Disorder/psychology , Cluster Analysis , Domestic Violence/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Disorders/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Previous evaluations of wife assault treatment outcome have focused generically on whether groups "succeed" or not without a clear criterion of what constituted success. The present study examines the question for whom groups generate the greatest reduction in post-treatment abuse and for whom they work least well. It was found that certain types of personality disordered men had the worst post-treatment prognosis. Specifically, men with high scores on borderline personality, antisocial personality, and avoidant personality fared least well after treatment. However, taken as a generic group, men in treatment had significantly reduced post-treatment abusiveness whether reported by themselves or their wives.
Subject(s)
Personality Disorders/psychology , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Spouse Abuse/rehabilitation , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Antisocial Personality Disorder/psychology , Borderline Personality Disorder/psychology , British Columbia , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Prognosis , RecurrenceABSTRACT
The presence of chronic trauma symptoms and similarity to a specific profile for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were assessed in a group 132 wife assaultive men and 44 demographically matched controls. Men who committed intimate abuse experienced more chronic trauma symptoms than nonabusive controls. A composite profile on the MCMI-II for wife assaulters demonstrated peaks on 82C (negative/avoidant/borderline), as have two independent studies of the profile of men diagnosed with PTSD. However, the assaultive population had higher scores on the antisocial personality scale and lower scores on anxiety and dysthymia. This PTSD-like profile on the MCMI-II was associated significantly with more frequent anger and emotional abuse of the subject's partner. The trauma origin for these men may have been parental treatment: experiencing frequent trauma symptoms as an adult was significantly related to negative recollections of parental treatment, specifically parental coldness/rejection and physical abuse.
Subject(s)
Spouse Abuse/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , British Columbia , Case-Control Studies , Discriminant Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , Personality Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Factors , Violence/psychologyABSTRACT
Shame-proneness has been found to be related to anger arousal and a tendency to externalize attributions for one's own behavior, both common features of men who assault their wives. The present study examined a potential origin of a shame-prone style by analysing reports of shaming experiences by ones' parents as reported by a population of assaultive males. Significant relationships were found for recollections of shaming actions by parents on adult anger, abusiveness (as reported by the men's wives), and a constellation of personality variables related to abusiveness in prior research. These associations maintained even after corrections were made for response sets such as social desirability. These shaming actions were largely comprised of recollections of parental punishment that were public, random, or global. The role of shame experiences in disturbances of self-identity and rage is discussed.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Guilt , Parent-Child Relations , Shame , Spouse Abuse , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anger , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Child , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Love , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Inventory , Personality Tests , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Case histories of parricide by adolescents frequently reveal a history of abuse on the part of the victim and acute depression and suicidal ideation by the adolescent. This paper seeks to integrate an established concept of suicide as escape from "aversive self-awareness" through cognitive deconstruction with clinical observations of "projective-introjective cycling" of aggressive impulses, as a means of better understanding and preventing violence toward intimate others.
Subject(s)
Homicide/psychology , Parent-Child Relations , Projection , Socialization , Suicide/psychology , Adolescent , Aggression/psychology , Child Abuse/psychology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Humans , Internal-External Control , Personality Development , Risk Factors , Self ConceptABSTRACT
PIP: A brief self-report is described that assesses propensity for male abusiveness of a female partner in intimate relationships. The Propensity for Abusiveness Scale (PAS) items is nonreactive and contains no explicit reference to abusive behavior. The scale has good psychometric properties, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 and three distinct factors. Data were provided by 140 men in treatment for wife assault and by 63 of their female partners. In addition, 44 demographically matched men and 33 of their partners were evaluated. The scale was validated against reports of abuse victimization by men's female partners using the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1988). The scale correlated 0.51 with women's reports of male Domination/Isolation tactics, and 0.47 with Emotional Abuse scale scores. A discriminant function for high versus low abusiveness indicated that the PAS correctly classified 82.2% of men into high (one standard deviation below) abusiveness. Social desirability corrections do not significantly change the trend of correlations of the PAS with criterion variables. A cross validation of the scale supported the initial results. The scale also correlates significantly with physical abuse.^ieng
Subject(s)
Domestic Violence , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Family Relations , Personality , Women , Americas , Behavior , Canada , Crime , Developed Countries , Family Characteristics , North America , Psychology , Social Behavior , Social ProblemsSubject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Borderline Personality Disorder/psychology , Borderline Personality Disorder/therapy , Child of Impaired Parents/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Assessment , Personality Development , Risk Factors , Spouse Abuse/legislation & jurisprudence , Spouse Abuse/prevention & control , ViolenceABSTRACT
A critical review is made of feminist analyses of wife assault postulating that patriarchy is a direct cause of wife assault. Data are reviewed from a variety of studies indicating that (a) lesbian battering is more frequent than heterosexual battering, (b) no direct relationship exists between power and violence within couples, and (c) no direct relationship exists between structural patriarchy and wife assault. It is concluded that patriarchy must interact with psychological variables in order to account for the great variation in power-violence data. It is suggested that some forms of psychopathology may lead to some men adopting patriarchal ideology to justify and rationalize their own pathology.
Subject(s)
Battered Women , Social Dominance , Spouse Abuse , Women's Rights , Battered Women/psychology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Homosexuality, Female , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Personality Disorders , Power, Psychological , Psychopathology , Sexual Partners , Spouse Abuse/psychology , ViolenceABSTRACT
The concept of a battered woman syndrome was tested by assessing 50 battered women and 25 emotionally abused women who had recently left their relationships. For both groups, essential features of the syndrome were present and were significantly interrelated. Dynamic features of the prior abusive relationship correlated significantly with these sequelae. The concept of intermittency is proposed as an alternative to the cycle of violence theory as main contributor to the syndrome. Predictability of abuse was found to be unrelated to the intermittency measure.
Subject(s)
Spouse Abuse/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adult , Affective Symptoms/diagnosis , Affective Symptoms/psychology , Aged , Divorce/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Marriage/psychology , Middle Aged , Object Attachment , Personality Inventory , Power, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Syndrome , ViolenceABSTRACT
The present study is an extension of research that examined the relationship between borderline personality organization (BPO), anger (assessed with the Multidimensional Anger Inventory [MAI]), and wife abuse in 120 men who had committed wife assault. Seventy-five female partners reported on physical and psychological abuse by the men, using the Conflict Tactics Scale and the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. The men's BPO self-report scores correlated significantly with their partners' reports of their abusiveness as assessed by these scales. Three self-report subscale scores on the MAI and one on the BPO scale accounted for 50% of the variance in their partners' reports of domination and isolation, and for 35% of the women's reports of emotional abuse.
Subject(s)
Anger , Borderline Personality Disorder/complications , Borderline Personality Disorder/psychology , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Spouse Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychological Tests , Regression Analysis , Sampling Studies , Social Dominance , Social IsolationABSTRACT
An empirical test of traumatic bonding theory, the notion that strong emotional attachments are formed by intermittent abuse, is reported. In-depth assessments (interviews plus questionnaires) were conducted on 75 women who had recently left abusive relationships (50 where physical violence had occurred). The study found support for the effect of relationship dynamic factors such as extremity of intermittent maltreatment and power differentials on long-term felt attachment for a former partner, experienced trauma symptoms, and self-esteem, immediately after separation from an abusive partner and again after a six month interim. All three of these measures were significantly intercorrelated within each time period. Each measure at Time 1 correlated significantly with each corresponding measure at Time 2. After six months attachment had decreased by about 27%. Relationship variables (total abuse, intermittency of abuse and power differentials) accounted for 55% of the variance in the attachment measure at Time 2 indicating prolonged effects of abuse suffered in the relationship.
Subject(s)
Marriage/psychology , Object Attachment , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Violence , Adult , Child of Impaired Parents/psychology , Dominance-Subordination , Female , Humans , Internal-External Control , Middle Aged , Personality Development , Personality Inventory , Power, Psychological , Problem Solving , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosisSubject(s)
Family , Prisoners/psychology , Violence , Adolescent , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , False Positive Reactions , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Personality Disorders/psychology , Personality Inventory , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Wife assaulters attending a treatment group and women who had just exited an abusive relationship were asked to report on the extent of physical violence and emotional abuse in their relationship. Measures of socially desirable responding (SDR) were administered to both groups. Wife assaulters' self-reports of physical abuse correlated negatively with one SDR measure (the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding) but not another (the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale); emotional abuse correlated negatively with both measures. Although physical abuse was primarily related to impression management, psychological abuse was affected by both impression management and self-deception aspects of SDR. Wife assaulters' reports of their own anger also correlated negatively with SDR. Both self-deception and impression management appear to contribute to underreporting of anger. Finally, abuse victims' reports of both physical and emotional abuse were unrelated to SDR.
Subject(s)
Defense Mechanisms , Social Desirability , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Violence , Adult , Aggression/psychology , Anger , Conflict, Psychological , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Internal-External Control , Male , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , SocializationABSTRACT
A review of the experimental literature on wife assault causation indicates that differing "profiles" of wife assaulters have been developed by different research strategies. Profiles based on interviews with victims suggest a tyrannical, personality-disordered type of wife assaulter. Clinical assessments reveal several profiles, only one of which is consistent with this view. Other types of wife assaulters are dependent and unassertive. By comparing the emerging data on wife assaulters with the initial clinical descriptions, an assessment is made of the contribution of empirical studies to date. While the potential for a major contribution to our understanding of wife assaulters exists through use of systematic empirical methods, it is concluded that this potential has not yet been fulfilled. Some suggestions are made for future research strategies to improve empirical capabilities in furthering this understanding, including a more thorough assessment of early trauma as a major causative factor affecting a large subcategory of wife assaulters and greater attention to the self-selection of wife assault samples.
Subject(s)
Aggression/psychology , Gender Identity , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Men who had assaulted their wives were compared to maritally conflicted (but nonassaultive) and satisfactorily married controls through the use of Thematic Apperception Test stories scored for the need for power. When the stimulus pictures showed ambiguous male-female relationships, the assaultive men generated higher need-for-power scores than the average of both control groups combined but did not differ from the maritally conflicted group on need for power. The assaultive men had lower spouse-specific assertiveness scores than either control group, however. A discriminant analysis based on need-for-power and assertiveness scores correctly classified the wife assaulters and maritally conflicted males 90% of the time. The resulting profile of assaultive men was of a group high in the need to exert power in relationships with women but lacking in the verbal resources to do so. It was hypothesized that this combination of a high need for power and a deficit in verbal ability to generate influence produces chronic frustration, which may increase the risk of violence when combined with other factors.
Subject(s)
Assertiveness , Gender Identity , Motivation , Power, Psychological , Spouse Abuse/psychology , Adult , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Thematic Apperception Test , ViolenceABSTRACT
This study represents an attempt to assess the effectiveness of court-mandated treatment for wife assault. A quasi-experimental design examined post-conviction recidivism rates for men convicted of wife assault. Fifty men who completed a 16-week treatment program had a 4% recidivism rate for a posttreatment period of up to 3 years. A comparable group who were not treated had a 40% recidivism rate in the same period. Hence, the "success" rate of treatment was 36% according to police records (Rosenthal, 1983). Straus Conflict Tactics Scale scores reported both by the treated men and their wives demonstrated significant posttreatment decreases from pretreatment levels. Treated husbands' average annual use of severe violence dropped from 10.6 to 1.7 times per year (p less than 0.01). Eighty-four percent of wives reported no posttreatment violence. Rates of verbal aggression also dropped significantly from pretreatment levels. Comparison with CTS scores of a group of men who were arrested but not treated for wife assault (Jaffe, Wolfe, Telford, & Austin 1986) revealed significant decreases in the use of Physical Aggression subscale tactics (as reported by their wives) as a result of treatment. Interpretative difficulties with the quasi-experimental design used in this study are discussed and a randomized design with appropriate psychological assessment of subjects is recommended.