Proximal toe wrap-around: a coverage technique for circumferential skin defects of the fingers.

Circumferential skin defects of the fingers are a technical challenge. Although rare, their management should respect tissue organization and functional abilities. We report two cases of circumferential skin defect. Management used individually tailored "wrap-around" flaps taken from the hallux. The sample concerned the proximal cutaneous sheath of the first toe and the neurovascular pedicle of the first inter-metatarsal space. Nail and toe pad were spared. Both cases had complex circumferential skin defect of the finger, involving the neuro-vascular pedicle. Postoperative results were favorable, without functional limitation. The wrap-around technique provided skin coverage and also neurovascular pedicle reconstruction. Donor site damage was limited, with no functional consequences. This technique is a valuable option for management of circumferential skin defect of the finger.

Nerve entrapment complicating neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome surgery: A 10-year retrospective study.

Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome results from compression of the brachial plexus. The symptoms are mainly pain, upper-limb weakness and paresthesia. Management always starts with a rehabilitation program, but failure of rehabilitation may necessitate surgery. In practice, we observed that several patients developed secondary distal nerve entrapment in the months following surgery, with no preoperative compression. We aimed to assess the occurrence of distal nerve entrapment after surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in a retrospective cohort study. Seventy-four patients were included; 82% females; mean age, 39.4 ± 9.4 years. There were 36.5% with high intensity and 63.5% with low to moderate intensity work. Eighteen (24.3%) developed secondary upper-limb entrapment at 10.6 ± 5.8 months after surgery. Sixteen had a single entrapment and 2 had two different entrapments. In 10 cases (50%) the ulnar nerve was involved at the elbow, in 7 (35.0%) the radial nerve at the radial tunnel, and in 3 (15.0%) the median nerve. No differences were found between patients with and without secondary nerve entrapment in gender (p = 0.51), mean age (p = 0.44), symptom duration (p = 0.92) or work intensity (p = 0.26). Further studies are needed to confirm these results and to shed light on the underlying mechanisms.

Possible role of the botulinum toxin in the management of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is related to the compression and/or the traction of the upper-limb neurovascular bundle, responsible for a chronic painful impairment. Neurogenic TOS (NTOS) is the most common manifestation. It remains a challenging diagnosis and its treatment is also difficult. Botulinum toxin (BTX) has been described to help both the diagnosis and the symptoms improvement. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature research was performed using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases to collect studies reporting the use of BTX in NTOS management. We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the included studies were evaluated using the GRADE approach. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included 10 original articles representing 555 patients. Various outcomes were considered, and results varied from a study to another. Symptoms relief varied from an absence of BTX effectiveness to 84.1% of improvement; relief duration was also reported from none to 88 days. BTX injections were debatable predictors of surgical procedure successes due to low evidence. There was a huge gap between the studies concerning side-effects of the BTX procedures, from none to 100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for considering BTX injection as a validated tool for the management of NTOS. There might be a slight effect on symptoms, but outcomes are very variable, which prevents further interpretations. The use of BTX should be evaluated in larger prospective cohorts with more standardized outcomes.

Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability Treated Using the Arthroscopic Bankart-Latarjet Technique: Experience of a Peripheral Hospital.

The arthroscopic Bankart-Latarjet procedure is used in the surgical management of anterior shoulder instability. This technique is mainly performed in referral centers due to its high technicity. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes in a peripheral hospital center. This is a retrospective study of patients treated for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The clinical scores (Walch-Duplay, Rowe, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI)) were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery. The consolidation and the position of the bone block were evaluated at 6 months using a CT scan. Between 2016 and 2020, 40 patients had been operated on (mean age: 28.5 ± 7.9 years). During a mean follow-up of 29.5 ± 11.6 months, we noted only one complication, a case of fracture of the callus of a consolidated bone block. No recurrence of instability was recorded. The Walch-Duplay score increased from 17.8 to 94.6, the Rowe score from 24.9 to 96.8, and the WOSI score decreased from 52.1% to 6.9%. The bone block was consolidated in 35 patients (87.5%), and a flush position with the anterior edge of the glenoid was noted for all patients. At one year, 67.0% of the patients practicing sport had returned to sports. The arthroscopic Bankart-Latarjet technique was a reliable procedure in the hands of an experienced shoulder surgeon, even in a peripheral hospital center.

Joint capsule innervation does not explain the difference in symptoms between scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Peritrapezial osteoarthritis (OA) includes scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal OA. In clinical practice, scaphotrapezial OA seems better tolerated than trapeziometacarpal OA, with fewer complaints and better tolerance. The difference in pain could be linked to a difference in joint capsule innervation, perhaps with fewer nerve fibers in the scaphotrapezial than the trapeziometacarpal joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a histologic evaluation of these two joints to compare their respective innervation in 17 cadaveric specimens with peritrapezial OA. Radiographic scoring confirmed the presence of peritrapezial OA. Mean Kellgren-Lawrence score was 2.2 ± 1.1 in the trapeziometacarpal joint and 1.5 ± 0.7 in the scaphotrapezial joint (p = 0.08). RESULTS: There was no difference between scaphotrapezial and trapeziometacarpal joints in number of neurofilaments: 5.2 ± 3.9 and 4.4 ± 4.5, respectively (p = 0.20). A significant difference was found in S100 staining (myelinated structures), with a higher rate in the scaphotrapezial joint: 11.8 ± 7.5 vs 6.6 ± 5.2 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that lower tolerance of trapeziometacarpal OA is not due to a difference in joint capsule innervation. On the contrary, we found a higher rate of myelinated tissues in the scaphotrapezial joint. These results suggested other pain pathways to explain clinical observations.

How periarticular corticosteroid injections impact the integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesic (MMA) injections combined with corticosteroids have recently been shown to be effective for managing pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of corticosteroid injections on the integrity of tendon repairs using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The hypothesis was that MMA injections combined with corticosteroids have no deleterious effects on functional outcomes and tendon healing 1 year after surgical rotator cuff repair. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind study of 50 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair who were randomized into two groups. The study group (n=25) received a periarticular injection of a mixture of ropivacaine, morphine and methylprednisolone at the end of the procedure. The control group (n=25) received a placebo injection. The clinical outcomes were the pain level and complications, while the functional outcomes consisted of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST). The structural integrity of the operated tendons was analyzed on MRI at a mean follow-up of 15.1±1.3 months for the study group and 15.2±1.1 for the control group (p=0.848). RESULTS: Pain on a visual analog scale was significantly reduced in both groups after the surgery. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between groups at the final follow-up visit (p=0.803). Compared to the preoperative values, the CMS, ASES and SST significantly improved in both groups after surgery but were not significantly different between groups at the final assessment (p=0.801, 0.869 and 0.769, respectively). MRI revealed supraspinatus tendon retears in 16% of patients in the study group and 36% in the control group (p=0.107). There were no infections in the study group as of the final assessment. Advanced age (p=0.049), diabetes (p<0.01) and posterior extension of the tear (p=0.039) negatively impact healing. Corticosteroid injection did not negatively impact healing (p=0.197). CONCLUSION: This study shows that MMA injection combined with corticosteroids does not alter the tendon healing, clinical outcomes, or functional outcomes 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. It remains a safe and effective analgesia method during rotator cuff repair surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, low-powered placebo-controlled, randomized study.

All-arthroscopic, guided Eden-Hybbinette procedure using suture-button fixation for revision of failed Latarjet.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a guided arthroscopic Eden-Hybbinette procedure, using suture button for iliac crest bone graft fixation, in a series of patients with a prior failed Latarjet and persistent glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Seven consecutive patients (5 males, 2 females, mean age: 30.7 years [range, 17-47 years]) with recurrent anterior dislocations and glenoid deficiency greater than 20% underwent the all-arthroscopic revision procedure. The iliac crest bone graft and suture-button device (Bone-Link) were shuttled through the rotator interval. Specific drill guides were used and a suture tensioning device allowed bone graft compression. Previous broken screw shafts (3 patients) were left in situ. Graft placement and healing was assessed postoperatively with computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: No neurologic injury or hardware problems occurred, and no patient required further surgery. On computed tomography scan, optimal positioning (flush and under the equator) and healing of the bone graft was observed in all patients. At a mean follow-up of 21 months (range, 12-39 months), all but one patient were satisfied and had a stable shoulder; 5 returned to sports. The Constant score increased from 32 to 81 points, and the subjective shoulder value from 31% to 87% (P < .001). The Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores averaged 85.7 (range, 65-100) points and 86.4 (range, 70-100) points, respectively. CONCLUSION: Recurrence of anterior shoulder instability after a failed Latarjet procedure can be successfully treated by an all-arthroscopic Eden-Hybbinette procedure. Suture-button fixation is reliable and permits optimal positioning and predictable healing of the new bone graft; in addition, it is an appropriate fixation option in the setting of retained broken hardware.

Spinal muscle evaluation using the Sorensen test: a critical appraisal of the literature.

The first test for evaluating the isometric endurance of trunk extensor muscles was described by Hansen in 1964. In 1984, following a study by Biering-Sorensen, this test became known as the "Sorensen test" and gained considerable popularity as a tool reported to predict low back pain within the next year in males. The test consists in measuring the amount of time a person can hold the unsupported upper body in a horizontal prone position with the lower body fixed to the examining table. This test has been used in many studies, either in its original version or as variants. Although its discriminative validity, reproducibility, and safety seem good, debate continues to surround its ability to predict low back pain; in addition, the gender-related difference in position-holding time remains unexplained and the influence of body weight unclear. A contribution of the hip extensor muscles to position holding has been established, but its magnitude remains unknown. The influence of personal factors such as motivation complicates the interpretation of the results. Despite these drawbacks, the Sorensen test has become the tool of reference for evaluating muscle performance in patients with low back pain, most notably before and after rehabilitation programs.