Melanoma Diagnostic Practices of French-Speaking Belgian General Practitioners and the Prospective Study of Their Pigmented Skin Lesion Diagnostic Accuracy and Management.

General practitioners (GPs) are among the main actors involved in early melanoma diagnosis. However, melanoma diagnostic accuracy and management are reported to be insufficient among GPs in Europe. The primary aim of this observational prospective study was to shed light on melanoma diagnostic practices among French-speaking Belgian GPs. The second aim was to specifically analyse these GPs' pigmented skin lesion diagnostic accuracy and management. GPs from the five French-speaking districts of Belgium were asked to complete a questionnaire, before taking part in a melanoma diagnostic training session. First, we assessed the GPs' current melanoma diagnostic practices. Then, their pigmented skin lesion diagnostic accuracy and management were evaluated, through basic theoretical questions and clinical images. These results were subsequently analysed, according to the GPs' sociodemographic characteristics and medical practice type. In total, 89 GPs completed the questionnaire. Almost half of the GPs (43%; CI = [33;54]) were confronted with a suspicious skin lesion as the main reason for consultation once every 3 months, while 33% (CI = [24;43]) were consulted for a suspicious lesion as a secondary reason once a month. Prior to training, one-third of the GPs exhibited suboptimal diagnostic accuracy in at least one of six "life-threatening" clinical cases among two sets of 10 clinical images of pigmented skin lesions, which can lead to inadequate patient management (i.e. incorrect treatment and/or inappropriate reinsurance). This study underlines the need to train GPs in melanoma diagnosis. GPs' pigmented skin lesion diagnostic accuracy and management should be improved to increase early melanoma detection.

[Walk in clinics and out-of-hours care: 10 years later]. / Les postes de garde en médecine générale: 10 ans après.

The provision of care in general practice has changed significantly over recent years due to changes in the lifestyles of both doctors and patients. Moreover, the "inappropriate" use of emergency services is a critical issue which requires urgent attention. We conducted a review of both the Belgian and international literature to examine how frontline care has adapted and what issues these developments raise. In many countries, specific structures, such as walk-in clinics, out-of-hours centers, the deputizing services, have emerged creating a professional system of frontline care delivery. In Belgium, the Health and Disability Insurance system delegates the organization of out-of-hours primary care to local general practice assemblies who can develop services according to local requirements. In effect, new service delivery systems draw from a variety of models implemented in countries such as Canada, the United States or The Netherlands.

[Medical certificates: law, deontology and practice]. / Des certificats médicaux: loi, déontologie et pratique.

At the start of the 21st century, in a society that gives the impression of switching century every five years because of its never-ending evolution, the general practitioner is confronted every day to more complex situations, including problems encountered at the legal level. These last few years, the legal interrogations relevant to medicine and its progress became considerably more extensive in Belgium, as in many other countries. The medical law and its regulation are the subject of many front titles in the press and of animated political debates. The main issues concern the organ transplantation, the meddling with human genetics, the questions related to the reproduction, euthanasia or the protection of the patient's rights. All these legal problems, without exception, are the subject of a great deal of attention in society and create to many controversies. The growing number of regulations in many fields of medicine, as well as their growing complexity, reinforces the importance of the medical law as a distinct discipline of legal sciences. More and more, the doctors of any qualification are required to guarantee, by adequate certificates, the health, the aptitude, the situation of disease of their patients. The patients can then have certain advantages granted by society. Out of concern for their patients, the experts are sometimes tempted not to be perfectly objective. This attitude can lead to penal or disciplinary sanctions and may undermine the confidence of people who exercise authority to give the requested advantages. The initial mistrust, which led to the system of the certificate, extends to those who were supposed to fully collaborate. How to leave this infernal round that sterilizes, denatures the medical act? While waiting for men of goodwill to consider the system and reform it, it remains with the writers of certificates to avoid the traps lying in their path. The purpose of this work is to propose models of certificate that experts can fill in accordance of the circumstances. It is only a guide and consequently, it sometimes requires an interpretation. This is why each model is described together with its justification and its traps.