Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Transplant ; 6(10): 2470-5, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16939519

ABSTRACT

The ability of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to accurately predict death among liver transplant candidates allows for evaluation of geographic differences in transplant access for patients with similar death risk. Adjusted models of time to transplant and death for adult liver transplant candidates listed between 2002 and 2003 were developed to test for differences in MELD score among Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions and Donation Service Areas (DSA). The average MELD and relative risk (RR) of death varied somewhat by region (from 0.82 to 1.28), with only two regions having significant differences in RRs. Greater variability existed in adjusted transplant rates by region; 7 of 11 regions differed significantly from the national average. Simulation results indicate that an allocation system providing regional priority to candidates at MELD scores > or = 15 would increase the median MELD score at transplant and reduce the total number of deaths across DSA quintiles. Simulation results also indicate that increasing priority to higher MELD candidates would reduce the percentage variation among DSAs of transplants to patients with MELD scores > or = 15. The variation decrease was due to increasing the MELD score at time of transplantation in the DSAs with the lowest MELD scores at transplant.


Subject(s)
Liver Failure/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Adult , Humans , Incidence , Liver Failure/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology , Waiting Lists
2.
Am J Transplant ; 6(4): 783-90, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16539636

ABSTRACT

Transplant physicians and candidates have become increasingly aware that donor characteristics significantly impact liver transplantation outcomes. Although the qualitative effect of individual donor variables are understood, the quantitative risk associated with combinations of characteristics are unclear. Using national data from 1998 to 2002, we developed a quantitative donor risk index. Cox regression models identified seven donor characteristics that independently predicted significantly increased risk of graft failure. Donor age over 40 years (and particularly over 60 years), donation after cardiac death (DCD), and split/partial grafts were strongly associated with graft failure, while African-American race, less height, cerebrovascular accident and 'other' causes of brain death were more modestly but still significantly associated with graft failure. Grafts with an increased donor risk index have been preferentially transplanted into older candidates (>50 years of age) with moderate disease severity (nonstatus 1 with lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores) and without hepatitis C. Quantitative assessment of the risk of donor liver graft failure using a donor risk index is useful to inform the process of organ acceptance.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Liver Failure/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Body Height , Cadaver , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Racial Groups , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...