ABSTRACT
Airborne transmission is one of the major routes contributing to the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Successful aerosol transmission occurs when people release respiratory particles carrying infectious virus in the fine aerosol size range. It remains poorly understood how infection influences the physiological host factors that are integral to this process. Here we assessed the changes in breathing, exhaled droplets, and released virus early after infection with the Alpha and Delta variants in the Syrian hamster. Infection with the two variants led to only nuanced differences in viral tissue titers, disease severity, or shedding magnitude. Both variants led to a short window of detectable virus in the air between 24 h and 48 h, which was poorly reflected by upper respiratory shedding measured in oropharyngeal swabs. The loss of viable air samples coincided with changes in airway constriction as measured by whole body plethysmography, and a decrease of fine aerosols produced in the 1-10 m aerodynamic diameter range. We found that male sex was associated with greater viral replication in the upper respiratory tract and virus shedding in the air. This coincided with an exhaled particle profile shifted towards smaller droplets, independent of variant. Transmission efficiency of Alpha and Delta did not differ on average but exhibited clear variation among donor individuals, including a superspreading event. Transmission leading to substantial dual infections only occurred when both viruses were shed by the same donor and exposure was prolonged. These findings provide direct experimental evidence that quantitative and qualitative assessment of exhaled aerosols may be critical for understanding the limitations and determinants of efficient airborne transmission, thus allowing us to control the pandemic with non-pharmaceutical interventions. SignificanceAirborne transmission is one of the major routes for SARS-CoV-2, however underlying host and virus parameters remain poorly understood. Here, we provide direct experimental evidence that the quantitative and qualitative assessment of exhaled aerosols are critical to understand the efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission. We show that after infection, the Alpha and Delta variants of concern displayed a short window of detectable virus in the air in contrast to prolonged shedding measured in oropharyngeal swabs. The limited window coincided with changes in airway constriction, and a sex dependent decrease of fine aerosols produced in the 1-10 m aerodynamic diameter range. Dual airborne infections only occurred when both viruses were shed by the same donor and after prolonged exposure.
ABSTRACT
Environmental conditions affect virus inactivation rate and transmission potential. Understanding those effects is critical for anticipating and mitigating epidemic spread. Ambient temperature and humidity strongly affect the inactivation rate of enveloped viruses, but a mechanistic, quantitative theory of those effects has been elusive. We measure the stability of the enveloped respiratory virus SARS-CoV-2 on an inert surface at nine temperature and humidity conditions and develop a mechanistic model to explain and predict how temperature and humidity alter virus inactivation. We find SARS-CoV-2 survives longest at low temperatures and extreme relative humidities; median estimated virus half-life is over 24 hours at 10 {degrees}C and 40 % RH, but approximately 1.5 hours at 27 {degrees}C and 65 % RH. Our mechanistic model uses simple chemistry to explain the increase in virus inactivation rate with increased temperature and the U-shaped dependence of inactivation rate on relative humidity. The model accurately predicts quantitative measurements from existing studies of five different human coronaviruses (including SARS-CoV-2), suggesting that shared mechanisms may determine environmental stability for many enveloped viruses. Our results indicate scenarios of particular transmission risk, point to pandemic mitigation strategies, and open new frontiers in the mechanistic study of virus transmission.
ABSTRACT
The unprecedented pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 has created worldwide shortages of personal protective equipment, in particular respiratory protection such as N95 respirators. SARS-CoV-2 transmission is frequently occurring in hospital settings, with numerous reported cases of nosocomial transmission highlighting the vulnerability of healthcare workers. In general, N95 respirators are designed for single use prior to disposal. Here, we have analyzed four readily available and often used decontamination methods: UV, 70% ethanol, 70C heat and vaporized hydrogen peroxide for inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 on N95 respirators. Equally important we assessed the function of the N95 respirators after multiple wear and decontamination sessions.
