Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments.

OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments by emergency medicine physicians. DESIGN: Prospective observational study; 2 examiners each recorded various pelvic examination findings on 186 patients. SETTING: A private university hospital and a public county hospital staffed by attending emergency medicine physicians who share an emergency medicine residency program. SUBJECTS: Senior resident (3rd or 4th year) and attending emergency physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of agreement and percentage of positive agreement for cervical motion tenderness, uterine tenderness, adnexal tenderness, adnexal mass, and uterine size (within 2 cm). RESULTS: The agreement ranged between 71% and 84%, but the percentage of positive agreement was much lower, ranging from 17% to 33%. Agreement for uterine size, within 2 cm, was 60%. CONCLUSION: The findings of bimanual pelvic examinations performed by emergency physicians in an emergency department have poor interexaminer reliability.

A standardized letter of recommendation for residency application.

Emergency medicine (EM) program directors have expressed a desire for more evaluative data to be included in application materials. This is consistent with frustrations expressed by program directors of multiple specialties, but mostly by those in specialties with more competitive matches. Some of the concerns about traditional narrative letters of recommendation included lack of uniform information, lack of relative value given for interval grading, and a perception of ambiguity with regard to terminology. The Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors established a task force in 1995 that created a standardized letter of recommendation form. This form, to be completed by EM faculty, requests that objective, comparative, and narrative information be reported regarding the residency applicant.

A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We conducted a 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency. Our specific aims were (1) to calculate the main ED patient care time intervals to identify areas of inefficiency, (2) to measure the effect of ED and inpatient bed availability on patient flow, (3) to quantitatively assess the effects of administrative interventions aimed at improving efficiency, and (4) to evaluate the relationship between waiting times to see a physician and the number of patients who leave without being seen (LWBS) by a physician. METHODS: Seven 1-week ED patient flow time studies were conducted from September 1993 to July 1998 using identical study design and methodology. Patients presenting with complaints of chest pain, abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and extremity injury were included to represent the level of severity of patient conditions seen in our Los Angeles County hospital ED. The calculated time intervals representing the main phases of evaluation and treatment were (1) triage presentation to completion of registration, (2) completion of registration to ED treatment area entry, (3) ED treatment area entry to initial medical assessment, (4) triage presentation to initial medical assessment, (5) initial medical assessment to disposition order, and (6) disposition order to patient discharge from the ED. Total ED lengths of stay (LOS) were also calculated as overall measures of efficiency. Time intervals were compared depending on the availability of ED and hospital inpatient beds. The effects of administrative interventions on the specific time intervals were assessed. The relationship between the median waiting time to see a physician and the number of LWBS patients was evaluated. Administrative interventions were implemented by a special interdepartmental continuous quality improvement committee. Interventions were aimed at specific sources of delay and inefficiency identified by the time studies. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-six patients were included in the 7 time studies. The unavailability of ED and inpatient beds was associated with significant delays. There was a significant reduction of the median total ED LOS from 6.8 hours to 4.6 hours over the first 5 periods, presumably resulting from the administrative interventions. Median total ED LOS, however, increased from 4.6 hours to 6.0 hours during the last 2 periods, possibly as a result of an increase in our ED patient census and reductions in both nursing and physician staffing imposed by the recent Los Angeles County fiscal crisis. The number of LWBS patients was closely correlated to waiting time to see a physician ( r =0.79, beta=5.20, P =.033). CONCLUSION: Time studies are an effective method of identifying areas of patient care delay. In our ED, targeted administrative interventions apparently reduced the total ED LOS and improved overall efficiency. Despite initial decreases in ED LOS, efficiency appeared to be adversely affected by reductions in nursing and physician staffing and increases in our patient census. The strength of the relationship between waiting times to see a physician and the number of LWBS patients suggests that decreasing waiting times may reduce the number of LWBS patients.

The PROEF diet--a new postoperative regimen for oral early feeding.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if immediate postoperative feeding of a new oral elemental diet (PROEF diet) would be tolerated by patients and to determine its effect on gastrointestinal function after cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred eighteen patients undergoing cesarean section were randomly assigned by a computer-generated list of numbers to receive either the PROEF diet (60 patients) or routine postoperative dietary management (58 patients). Gastrointestinal morbidity was analyzed by an independent-samples t test. RESULTS: The PROEF diet group has a more rapid return of normal bowel sounds, 10.3 versus 14.5 hours (p = 0.001), and earlier acceptance of a regular diet, 2.0 versus 2.3 days (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The PROEF diet was well tolerated in cesarean section patients with no increase in gastrointestinal morbidity when compared with a control group of patients. This dispels the classic teaching that postoperative patients may not have oral intake until the return of normal bowel function. Further study is necessary to support the theoretic benefits that may accrue from early feeding of an elemental diet.