ABSTRACT
Objetivo Ofrecer una serie de recomendaciones generales que sirvan de orientación en la evaluación y el manejo de la progresión glaucomatosa en la práctica clínica diaria a partir de la evidencia clínica de calidad existente. Métodos Tras la definición de los objetivos y del alcance de la guía se constituyó el grupo de trabajo que formuló las preguntas clínicas estructuradas siguiendo el formato PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes). Una vez evaluada toda la evidencia clínica existente con las herramientas AMSTAR2 (Assessment of Multiple systematic Rewiews) y Risk of bias de Cochrane de forma independiente por al menos dos revisores, se pasó a la formulación de recomendaciones siguiendo la metodología del Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN). Resultados Se presentan recomendaciones con sus correspondientes niveles de evidencia que pueden ser de utilidad para la detección y el seguimiento de la progresión glaucomatosa con los distintos métodos disponibles y para el tratamiento de los pacientes. Conclusiones A pesar de que para muchas de las preguntas el nivel de evidencia científica disponible no es muy alto, esta guía de práctica clínica ofrece una revisión actualizada de los diferentes aspectos existentes relacionados con la evaluación y el manejo de la progresión glaucomatosa (AU)
Objective To provide general recommendations that serve as a guide for the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression in daily clinical practice based on the existing quality of clinical evidence. Methods After defining the objectives and scope of the guide, the working group was formed and structured clinical questions were formulated following the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) format. Once all the existing clinical evidence had been independently evaluated with the AMSTAR2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) and Cochrane «Risk of bias» tools by at least two reviewers, recommendations were formulated following the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline network (SIGN) methodology. Results Recommendations with their corresponding levels of evidence that may be useful in the interpretation and decision-making related to the different methods for the detection of glaucomatous progression are presented. Conclusions Despite the fact that for many of the questions the level of scientific evidence available is not very high, this clinical practice guideline offers an updated review of the different existing aspects related to the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Glaucoma/therapy , Disease Progression , Severity of Illness Index , Follow-Up Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To provide general recommendations that serve as a guide for the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression in daily clinical practice based on the existing quality of clinical evidence. METHODS: After defining the objectives and scope of the guide, the working group was formed and structured clinical questions were formulated following the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) format. Once all the existing clinical evidence had been independently evaluated with the AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) and Cochrane "Risk of bias" tools by at least two reviewers, recommendations were formulated following the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline network (SIGN) methodology. RESULTS: Recommendations with their corresponding levels of evidence that may be useful in the interpretation and decision-making related to the different methods for the detection of glaucomatous progression are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that for many of the questions the level of scientific evidence available is not very high, this clinical practice guideline offers an updated review of the different existing aspects related to the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression.
Subject(s)
Glaucoma , Humans , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Glaucoma/therapyABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Presentar el caso clínico de un paciente que presenta vasculopatía coroidea polipoidea (VCP) bilateral y degeneración macular asociada a la edad (DMAE) exudativa y atrófica, su tratamiento. Caso clínico. Mujer de 83 años presenta disminución de agudeza visual en el ojo izquierdo (OI). Al examen presenta DMAE atrófica en el OD, y en el OI una lesión naranja yuxtapapilar con depósitos lipídicos y otra gris subfoveal inferior. En la angiografía fluoresceínica y de verde de indocianina (AVI) se evidencia una membrana neovascular clásica en el OI, y pólipos yuxtapapilares en ambos ojos. Se realiza terapia fotodinámica con inyecciones anti-VEGF con estabilización de lesiones. CONCLUSIÓN: La coexistencia de la vasculopatía polipoidea coroidea y la DMAE exudativa es posible. Ante la sospecha de VCP debe realizarse AVI
OBJECTIVE: To present the case of simultaneous presentation of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and aged-related macular degeneration (AMD). Case report. An 83-year-old woman presented with decreased vision in the left eye (LE). In the examination there was an orange peripapillary lesion surrounded by lipid exudates and another subfoveal greyish lesion in the LE. Disciform scarring was observed in the right eye. Fluorescein angiography showed a classic neovascular membrane in in the LE fovea. Indocyanine angiography (ICGA) showed a polyp-like peri-papillary aneurysmal dilation in both eyes. The patient was treated with photodynamic therapy and anti-VEFG injections with stabilisation of the lesions. CONCLUSION: PCV and AMD can co-exist in unusual cases. When PCV is suspected, ICGA is mandatory for diagnosis
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Macular Degeneration/complications , Macular Degeneration/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Refractive Errors/therapy , Phototherapy , Angiography , Electroretinography/instrumentation , Electroretinography/methods , RetinaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To present the case of simultaneous presentation of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and aged-related macular degeneration (AMD). CASE REPORT: An 83-year-old woman presented with decreased vision in the left eye (LE). In the examination there was an orange peripapillary lesion surrounded by lipid exudates and another subfoveal greyish lesion in the LE. Disciform scarring was observed in the right eye. Fluorescein angiography showed a classic neovascular membrane in in the LE fovea. Indocyanine angiography (ICGA) showed a polyp-like peri-papillary aneurysmal dilation in both eyes. The patient was treated with photodynamic therapy and anti-VEFG injections with stabilisation of the lesions. CONCLUSION: PCV and AMD can co-exist in unusual cases. When PCV is suspected, ICGA is mandatory for diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Choroid Diseases/complications , Choroid/blood supply , Macular Degeneration/complications , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Geographic Atrophy/complications , HumansABSTRACT
The authors present diagnostic and therapeutic documentation of a very rare case of a tumour with carcinoma embryonal in a 16-year old girl. After the surgery (total hysterectomy and adnexectomy) followed by chemotherapy, the patient survived four years.
