ABSTRACT
Biomimetic aspects of restoration of the frontal and side teeth, on one hand, facilitated achievement of the desired esthetic effect and on the other--complicated the way of achievement of the final result. Consequently, the new products of the leading manufacturers are realized in the dental clinics with the interest and impatient, though vigilantly. Goal of this research was comparative description of the effects of filling composites Profil, Charisma and Estelite. Restoration works, using the composite materials were conducted both, in clinics and experimentally, on the extracted teeth. Research results showed: micro-hybrid components of Profil and Charisma had almost identical clinical parameters (compactness, range of colors and plasticity, in modeling). Though, colors seemed to be more saturated in case of application of Profil. Micro-matrix composite Estelite, according to our results, is characterized with more prominent transparency, requiring application of the large layers of opaque shades. Though, high saturation of Estelite (82% of inorganic fraction) is conditioned by the sensity of composite, justifying its application for both, restoration of teeth and correction of the contact occlusion points. Thus, in restoration of teeth, which are subject to high load at a time of chewing (premolars, molars), Estelite is preferable. It would be better to use Profil in filling of the cavities of small size and Charisma might be recommended for the frontal teeth groups, though, in esthetic restoration, composites without filling should be preferred.
