Biologic treatment for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is often severe, debilitating and difficult to treat. Biologics that target key inflammatory pathways have the potential to treat this disease; this study aimed to evaluate their effectiveness. METHODOLOGY: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Primary outcomes were extent of disease, objective disease severity and disease-specific quality of life, with outcomes measured at different end-of-treatment timepoints in different studies (range 16-52 weeks). RESULTS: Eleven trials were identified with 2035 participants. Ten studies reported change in polyp size, estimating a reduction of -1.25 in the treatment group. Six studies reported reduction in Lund-Mackay score where the pooled mean difference was -4.90. Five studies included peak nasal inspiratory flow with a pooled mean difference of 33.54, indicating improved nasal airflow. Seven studies reported change in olfactory score with an overall pooled effect of 6.56 suggesting improved olfaction. The SNOT-22 score in nine studies gave an overall pooled effect of -14.53, indicating improved quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics can be effective in treating nasal polyps, with reduction in polyp size and extent of disease, and improved sense of smell and quality of life. There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes for individual biologics, highlighting the need for further studies.

Analytical evaluation and critical appraisal of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in mild and asymptomatic subjects to enable the selection of suitable immunoassays for routine diagnostic use.Methods: We used serum samples from a pre-COVID era patient cohort (n = 50, pre-December 2019), designated SARS-CoV-2 negative, and serum samples from a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive cohort (n = 90) taken > 14 days post-symptom onset (April-May 2020). Six ELISA assays were evaluated, including one confirmation assay to investigate antibody specificity. We also evaluated one point-of-care lateral flow device (LFIA) and one high throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA).Results: The ELISA specificities ranged from 84% to 100%, with sensitivities ranging from 75.3% to 90.0%. The LFIA showed 100% specificity and 80% sensitivity using smaller sample numbers. The Roche CLIA immunoassay showed 100% specificity and 90.7% sensitivity. When used in conjunction, the Euroimmun nucleocapsid (NC) and spike-1 (S1) IgG ELISA assays had a sensitivity of 95.6%. The confirmation Dia.Pro IgG assay showed 92.6% of samples tested contained both NC and S1 antibodies, 32.7% had NC, S1 and S2 and 0% had either S1 or S2 only.Conclusions: The Roche assay and the Euroimmun NC and S1 assays had the best sensitivity overall. Combining the assays detecting NC and S1/S2 antibody increased diagnostic yield. These first-generation assays were not calibrated against reference material and the results were reported qualitatively. A portfolio of next-generation SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays will be necessary to investigate herd and vaccine-induced immunity.

Circulating levels of active transforming growth factor beta1 are reduced in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis and correlate inversely with the modified Rodnan skin score.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between clinical features and circulating levels of active transforming growth factor (TGF) beta1 in the major subsets of systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: In a cross-sectional study cases of diffuse cutaneous SSc (dose) (n = 27) or limited cutaneous SSc (dose) (n = 20) were compared with healthy controls (n = 22). Active and total TGFbeta1 was measured in serum and plasma by a high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between levels of total serum TGFbeta1. However, cases of dcSSc had lower levels of active TGFbeta1 than cases of lcSSc or controls. In addition, more cases of dcSSc (18/27; 66%, P < 0.025) had no detectable active TGFbeta1 than controls (7/22, 32%) or lcSSc (7/20, 35%). In dcSSc, serum active TGFbeta1 levels correlated negatively with skin score and positively with disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to expectation, levels of active TGFbeta1 are reduced in dcSSc and this correlates with two variables known to associate with disease activity, shorter duration and more extensive skin sclerosis. This suggests that active TGFbeta1 may be sequestered in active involved SSc skin and that serum levels are reduced despite strong evidence implicating TGFbeta isoforms in the pathogenesis of fibrosis. Our findings may have implications for systemic TGFbeta-trapping therapies in this disease.

N-terminal connective tissue growth factor is a marker of the fibrotic phenotype in scleroderma.

BACKGROUND: Over-expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a hallmark of fibrotic disease, including scleroderma. CTGF acts with the pro-fibrotic cytokine TGFbeta to promote sustained fibrotic responses in vivo. Elevated production of CTGF might be responsible for maintenance of the fibrotic phenotype in scleroderma. Assays of CTGF or of its fragments are potential non-invasive measures of the fibrotic response in scleroderma. AIM: To determine the utility of whole, N-terminal, and C-terminal CTGF as surrogate markers for fibrosis in scleroderma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional controlled study. METHODS: Plasma was collected prospectively from 47 scleroderma patients (26 diffuse scleroderma, 21 limited scleroderma) and 18 healthy controls. At the same time, dermal interstitial fluid was derived by a suction blister technique from the lesional skin of scleroderma patients, and from the forearm skin of healthy controls. Whole, N-terminal, and C-terminal CTGF were assayed by ELISA, using monoclonal antibodies specific for N- and C-terminal epitopes. RESULTS: N-terminal cleavage products of CTGF were present at elevated levels in the plasma and dermal interstitial fluid of scleroderma patients, compared to healthy controls. N-terminal CTGF levels in plasma and dermal interstitial fluid correlated with severity of skin disease and (negatively) with disease duration. Whole and C-terminal CTGF levels were low in blister fluid and plasma levels were not elevated in disease. DISCUSSION: These results support a role for CTGF in scleroderma-associated fibrosis and the utility of N-terminal CTGF as a marker of fibrosis.

Serological assessment of type I collagen burden in scleroderma spectrum disorders: a systematic review.

RATIONALE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity of collagen type I metabolites as markers of disease activity in scleroderma (SSc), through a systematic review of the literature and by validating the results by measuring collagen type I metabolites in well characterized patients with scleroderma spectrum disorders and in Raynaud's phenomenon. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of studies of collagen type I metabolites in scleroderma spectrum disorders published from 1980 to 2003. The collected results from the literature were compared with our own measurements of collagen type I metabolites (PINP and ICTP) in a small number of well characterized patients within the scleroderma spectrum and in patients with primary and "autoimmune" Raynaud's phenomenon. Peptide concentrations from all sources, including the present study, were compared. Reported correlations between peptide concentrations and clinical variables were also analysed. RESULTS: Of 19 papers identified by an extensive Medline search, 12 were eligible for systematic analysis. There was a considerable heterogeneity in the results with a wide range of metabolite concentrations. Values from disease groups and healthy controls overlapped. These findings were confirmed by our study where, similarly, there was a large range of values in all groups, but particularly in the diffuse SSc subset. When the correlation between peptide levels and clinical variables was assessed, large discordance between the studies was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We have not found sufficient evidence to support the use of serum markers of collagen turnover in the assessment of scleroderma activity and severity, in view of their low specificity and the heterogeneity of the results of various studies. Lack of standardized routine evaluation of SSc patients in clinical studies might have accounted for the variability of the findings. However, due to the small sizes of most published studies, demonstration of no effect should come from large-scale randomised trials. Longitudinal serial analysis of these molecules in individual patients may play a future role in the evaluation of the response to fibroblast-targeting therapeutic strategies in scleroderma patients.

Losartan therapy for Raynaud's phenomenon and scleroderma: clinical and biochemical findings in a fifteen-week, randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of losartan, an antagonist of angiotensin II receptor type 1, with nifedipine for the treatment of primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in a pilot study. METHODS: In a randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial, patients with primary RP (n = 25) or RP secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc [scleroderma]; n = 27) were allocated to receive 12 weeks' treatment with either losartan (50 mg/day) or nifedipine (40 mg/day). Primary outcome variables were the severity and frequency of RP episodes and findings on vascular measurements, including thermography and laser Doppler flowmetry. Serum levels of soluble adhesion molecules, endothelin 1, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were also measured. RESULTS: There was a reduction in the severity of RP episodes following treatment with losartan and with nifedipine, but this effect was greater in the losartan arm of the study (P<0.05): episode frequency was reduced only in the losartan group (P<0.01 versus baseline). Symptomatic improvement was associated with a significant reduction in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and PINP (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis suggested that although these biochemical changes occurred mainly in SSc patients, the clinical benefit was greater in the primary RP group. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the tolerability of short-term treatment of RP with losartan, and our data suggest its clinical benefit. Further evaluation of this drug as a long-term treatment for SSc-associated RP should be considered, since it may have additional disease-modifying potential.