ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several studies show that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program reduces complications postoperatively and leads to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays. However, little is known about patients' self-reported health in an enhanced recovery context. The aim of this study was firstly to describe patient experiences of health within the concept of ERAS after colorectal (CR) surgery during a hospital stay and within 2 weeks of discharge. Secondly, to explore whether the ASA classification/co-morbidity, sex, and surgical method affect the patient's experience of health. METHODS: Data were collected through the ERAS-HEALTH questionnaire, including two open-ended questions, and through telephone interviews postoperatively. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was used. Patients undergoing CR surgery (n = 80) were included from October 2016 to June 2018. RESULTS: The patients had mainly positive experiences of their hospital stay as well as most of them felt comfortable coming home. However, experienced state of health is affected by factors like surgical method and co-morbidity. Improvements were desired concerning information, food/food intake, pain management, and environment. At home, the patients experienced a lack of information about food/food intake and ostomy care. Decreased appetite and difficulties with micturition were also described. The most troublesome symptom was postoperative fatigue (POF). Analysis of the ERAS-HEALTH questionnaire showed that patients with higher co-morbidity and those who underwent open surgery have a significantly worse experience of their health compared with patients who underwent laparoscopy. However, it seems that the surgical method affects postoperative health to a greater extent than co-morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The patients reported many positive aspects and challenges when being cared for within the ERAS program. However, several improvements are needed to satisfy patient wishes regarding their care both in hospital and at home. Laparoscopic surgery affects patient state of health positively in several respects compared with open surgery.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to register the incidence of scheduled and acute urinary catheter changes and rinses (acute interventions) among nursing home patients, to relate the incidence of acute interventions to catheter material and time of catheterization, and to register the use of antibiotics for catheter-associated urinary tract infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Catheter life and catheter-related interventions were followed prospectively for 1 year in all patients with long-term indwelling catheters in all 78 nursing homes in a county in western Sweden. RESULTS: Altogether, 366 patients were followed: 117 (32%) women and 249 (68%) men. Acute changes (n = 718) were more common than scheduled ones (n = 519). The rate of acute interventions was not related to catheter material and was significantly lower in patients with a catheter for over 2 years. In 25% of the patients, acute interventions were virtually never necessary, in contrast to 10% where acute interventions were registered nearly every month. Antibiotic treatment for reasons assumed to be related to the urinary tract was instituted on 170 occasions among 85 men (34%) and 20 women (17%), a significant difference between the genders (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS; No catheter material appeared to be superior. The surprising finding that acute interventions were less common after 2 years' catheterization needs further study to be verified and explained. Only 10-25% had a more frequent need for acute interventions and are candidates for future interventional studies.
