Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dairy Sci ; 100(1): 439-452, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837974

ABSTRACT

This study compares how different cow genotyping strategies increase the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (EBV) in dairy cattle breeds with low numbers. In these breeds, few sires have progeny records, and genotyping cows can improve the accuracy of genomic EBV. The Guernsey breed is a small dairy cattle breed with approximately 14,000 recorded individuals worldwide. Predictions of phenotypes of milk yield, fat yield, protein yield, and calving interval were made for Guernsey cows from England and Guernsey Island using genomic EBV, with training sets including 197 de-regressed proofs of genotyped bulls, with cows selected from among 1,440 genotyped cows using different genotyping strategies. Accuracies of predictions were tested using 10-fold cross-validation among the cows. Genomic EBV were predicted using 4 different methods: (1) pedigree BLUP, (2) genomic BLUP using only bulls, (3) univariate genomic BLUP using bulls and cows, and (4) bivariate genomic BLUP. Genotyping cows with phenotypes and using their data for the prediction of single nucleotide polymorphism effects increased the correlation between genomic EBV and phenotypes compared with using only bulls by 0.163±0.022 for milk yield, 0.111±0.021 for fat yield, and 0.113±0.018 for protein yield; a decrease of 0.014±0.010 for calving interval from a low base was the only exception. Genetic correlation between phenotypes from bulls and cows were approximately 0.6 for all yield traits and significantly different from 1. Only a very small change occurred in correlation between genomic EBV and phenotypes when using the bivariate model. It was always better to genotype all the cows, but when only half of the cows were genotyped, a divergent selection strategy was better compared with the random or directional selection approach. Divergent selection of 30% of the cows remained superior for the yield traits in 8 of 10 folds.


Subject(s)
Genotype , Selection, Genetic , Animals , Breeding , Cattle , Female , Genome , Genomics , Male , Models, Genetic , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
2.
J Dairy Sci ; 99(7): 5508-5515, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27179857

ABSTRACT

As of December 2015, 2,376 Guernsey bulls and cows had genotypes from collaboration between the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Isle of Guernsey. Of those, 439 bulls and 504 cows had traditional US evaluations, which provided sufficient data to justify investigation of the possible benefits of genomic evaluation for the Guernsey breed. Evaluation accuracy was assessed using a traditional 4-yr cutoff study. Twenty-two traits were analyzed (5 yield traits, 3 functional traits, and 14 conformation traits). Mean reliability gain over that for parent average was 16.8 percentage points across traits, which compares with 8.2, 18.5, 20.0, and 32.6 percentage points reported for Ayrshires, Brown Swiss, Jerseys, and Holsteins, respectively. Highest Guernsey reliability gains were for rump width (44.5 percentage points) and dairy form (40.5 percentage points); lowest gains were for teat length (1.9 percentage points) and rear legs (side view) (2.3 percentage points). Slight reliability losses (1.5 to 4.5 percentage points) were found for udder cleft, final score, and udder depth as well as a larger loss (13.6 percentage points) for fore udder attachment. Twenty-one single nucleotide polymorphisms were identified for Guernsey breed determination and can be used in routine genotype quality control to confirm breed and identify crossbreds. No haplotypes that affect fertility were identified from the current data set. Principal component analysis showed some divergence of US and Isle of Guernsey subpopulations. However, the overlap of US, Canadian, UK, and Isle of Guernsey subpopulations indicated the presence of gene flow, and the similarities in the subpopulations supports a common genomic evaluation system across the regions.


Subject(s)
Cattle/classification , Cattle/genetics , Animals , Breeding , Canada , Cattle/anatomy & histology , Female , Fertility/genetics , Genomics , Genotype , Guernsey , Haplotypes , Lactation/genetics , Male , North America , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Quantitative Trait, Heritable , Reproducibility of Results , Reproduction/genetics , Species Specificity , United Kingdom , United States
3.
J Dairy Sci ; 96(6): 4015-25, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23548304

ABSTRACT

As the emphasis in cattle breeding is shifting from traits that increase income toward traits that reduce costs, national breeding indices are expanding to include functional traits such as calving ease (CE). However, one issue is the lack of knowledge of genetic relationships between CE and other dairy traits. The same can be said about gestation length (GL), a potential novel selection trait with considerable heritabilities and possible genetic relationships with the calving process. This study aimed to estimate the genetic relationships between CE, GL, and other dairy traits of interest using a national data set of 31,053 primiparous cow performance records, as well as to separate direct and maternal genetic effects. Chosen dairy traits included fertility (calving interval, days to first service, nonreturn rate after 56 d, number of inseminations per conception), milk production (milk yield at d 110 in milk, accumulated 305-d milk yield, accumulated 305-d fat yield, accumulated 305-d protein yield), type (udder depth, chest width, rump width, rump angle, mammary composition, stature, body depth), and lifespan traits (functional days of productive life). To allow the separation of direct and maternal genetic effects, a random sire of the calf effect was included in the multi-trait linear trivariate sire models fitted using ASReml. Significant results showed that easily born individuals were genetically prone to high milk yield and reduced fertility in first lactation. Difficult calving primiparous cows were likely associated with being high-producing, wide and deep animals, with a reduced ability to subsequently conceive. Individuals that were born relatively early were associated with good genetic merit for milk production. Finally, individuals carrying their offspring longer were genetically associated with being wide and large animals that were themselves born relatively early. The study shows that it is feasible and valuable to separate direct and maternal effects when estimating genetic correlations between calving and other dairy traits. Furthermore, gestation length is best used as an indicator trait for lowly heritable calving traits, rather than as a novel selection trait. As estimated direct and maternal genetic correlations differ, we can conclude that genetic relationships between CE, GL, and traits of interest are present, but caution is required if these traits are implemented in national breeding indices.


Subject(s)
Cattle/genetics , Fertility/genetics , Gestational Age , Lactation/genetics , Longevity/genetics , Parturition/genetics , Animals , Breeding/methods , Female , Linear Models , Milk/chemistry , Quantitative Trait, Heritable , Selection, Genetic
4.
J Dairy Sci ; 94(11): 5413-23, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22032364

ABSTRACT

The effect of calving ease on the fertility and production performance of both dam and calf was studied in approximately 50,000 and 10,000 UK Holstein-Friesian heifers and heifer calves, respectively. The first objective of this study was to estimate the effect of a difficult calving on the subsequent first-lactation milk production by estimating lactation curves using cubic splines. This methodology allows the estimation of daily milk, protein, and fat yields following calvings of differing degrees of difficulty. Losses in milk yield after a difficult calving have been quantified previously; however, estimates are generally restricted to the accumulated yields at specific days in lactation. By fitting cubic splines, gaps (in which the shape of the lactation curve can be merely guessed) between estimations were avoided. The second objective of this study was to estimate the effect of a difficult birth on the subsequent performance of the calf as an adult animal. Even though the calving process is known to involve cooperation between dam and calf, the effect of a difficult calving has, until now, only been estimated for the subsequent performance of the dam. Addressing the effects of a difficult birth on the adult calf strengthens the importance of calving ease as a selection trait because it suggests that the benefit of genetic improvement may currently be underestimated. The effect of calving ease on the subsequent reproductive performance of dam and calf was analyzed using linear regression and with calving ease score fitted as a fixed effect. Dams with veterinary-assisted calvings required 0.7 more services to conception and 8 more days to first service and experienced a 28-d longer calving interval in first lactation compared with dams that were not assisted at calving. Effects of calving ease on the reproductive performance of the adult calf in first lactation were not detected. Losses in milk yield of the dam were significant between d 9 to 90 in milk subsequent to a veterinary-assisted calving, creating a loss of approximately 2 kg of milk per day, compared with a nonassisted calving. Calves being born with difficulties showed a significant reduction in milk yield in first lactation, demonstrating the lifelong effect of a difficult birth. Compared with nonassisted calves, veterinary-assisted calves showed a loss of 710 kg in accumulated 305-d milk yield, which was significant from 129 to 261 d in milk. This suggests that from birth to production, physiological effects of a bad calving are not negated. Results furthermore suggest a beneficial effect of farmer assistance at calving on the milk yield of both dam and calf, when moderate difficulties occurred.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Fertility/physiology , Lactation/physiology , Milk/metabolism , Phenotype , Pregnancy, Animal , Animals , Female , Pregnancy , Reproduction/physiology , United Kingdom
5.
J Dairy Sci ; 92(5): 2229-37, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19389982

ABSTRACT

Genetic parameters of direct and maternal effects for calving ease in Dutch dairy cattle were estimated using 677,975 calving ease records from second calving. Particular emphasis was given to the presence and impact of environmental dam-offspring covariances on the estimated direct-maternal genetic correlation. Moreover, a measure of heritability for traits affected by maternal effects was developed. In contrast to previous parameters, this parameter reflects the amount of genetic variance that can be used to generate a response to selection in maternally affected traits. Estimated genetic correlations between direct and maternal effects on calving ease have often been moderately negative, particularly in beef cattle. Environmental dam-offspring covariances have been put forward as an explanation for such estimates. We investigated the impact of environmental dam-offspring covariances by fitting correlated residuals between dam and offspring records in the statistical model, and by comparing results of a sire-maternal grandsire model with those of an animal model. Results show that calving ease in Dutch dairy cattle has a direct heritability of approximately 0.08, a maternal heritability of approximately 0.04, a direct-maternal genetic correlation of approximately -0.20, and a total heritable variance equal to approximately 11% of phenotypic variance. Results of animal models and sire-maternal grandsire models were very similar. The direct-maternal environmental covariance was near zero, and consequently had very little impact on the estimated genetic parameters. Transformation of observations to a liability scale did not affect the estimated genetic parameters and yielded a nearly identical ranking of sires.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/genetics , Obstetric Labor Complications/veterinary , Parturition/genetics , Age Factors , Animals , Breeding , Cattle , Female , Male , Obstetric Labor Complications/genetics , Pregnancy , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...