Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
1.
J Appl Biomech ; 39(4): 230-236, 2023 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37328156

ABSTRACT

Standing pelvic tilt (PT) is related to biomechanics linked with increased risk of injury such as dynamic knee valgus. However, there is limited evidence on how standing PT relates to dynamic PT and whether the palpation meter (PALM), a tool to measure standing PT, is valid against 3-dimensional (3D) motion analysis. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine the criterion validity of the PALM for measuring standing PT and (2) identify the relationship between standing PT and dynamic PT during running. Participants (n = 25; 10 males and 15 females) had their standing PT measured by the PALM and 3D motion analysis. Dynamic PT variables were defined at initial contact and toe off. No relationship between the 2 tools was found. Significant large positive relationships between standing PT and PT at initial contact (r = .751, N = 25, P < .001) and PT at toe off (r = .761, N = 25, P < .001) were found. Since no relationship was found between standing PT measured by the PALM and 3D motion analysis, the PALM is not a valid alternative to 3D motion analysis. Clinicians may be able to measure standing PT and gain valuable information on dynamic PT, allowing clinicians to quickly assess whether further biomechanical testing is needed.


Subject(s)
Motion Capture , Running , Male , Female , Humans , Posture , Standing Position , Motion
2.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(20): 1135-1143, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127482

ABSTRACT

Patellofemoral pain is a common and often debilitating musculoskeletal condition. Clinical translation and evidence synthesis of patellofemoral pain research are compromised by heterogenous and often inadequately reported study details. This consensus statement and associated checklist provides standards for REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain (REPORT-PFP) research to enhance clinical translation and evidence synthesis, and support clinician engagement with research and data collection. A three-stage Delphi process was initiated at the 2015 International Patellofemoral Research Network (iPFRN) retreat. An initial e-Delphi activity (n=24) generated topics and items, which were refined at the 2017 iPFRN retreat, and voted on prior to and following the 2019 iPFRN retreat (n=51 current and past retreat participants). Voting criteria included 'strongly recommended' (essential), 'recommended' (encouraged) and uncertain/unsure. An item was included in the checklist if ≥70% respondents voted 'recommended'. Items receiving ≥70% votes for 'strongly recommended' were labelled as such. The final REPORT-PFP checklist includes 31 items (11 strongly recommended, 20 recommended), covering (i) demographics (n=2,4); (ii) baseline symptoms and previous treatments (n=3,7); (iii) outcome measures (2,4); (iv) outcomes measure description (n=1,2); (v) clinical trial methodology (0,3) and (vi) reporting study results (n=3,0). The REPORT-PFP checklist is ready to be used by researchers and clinicians. Strong stakeholder engagement from clinical academics during development means consistent application by the international patellofemoral pain research community is likely. Checklist adherence will improve research accessibility for clinicians and enhance future evidence synthesis.


Subject(s)
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome , Research Design/standards , Checklist , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/diagnosis
3.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol ; 57: 102514, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476861

ABSTRACT

As joint coupling variability has been associated with running-related lower extremity injury, the purpose of this study was to identify how variability within the foot may be different between forefoot (FFS) and rearfoot strike (RFS) runners. Identifying typical variability in uninjured runners may contribute to understanding of ideal coordination associated with running foot strike patterns. Fifteen FFS and 15 RFS runners performed a maximal-effort 5 km treadmill run. A 7-segment foot model identified 6 functional articulations (rearfoot, medial and lateral midfoot and forefoot, and 1st metatarsophalangeal) for analysis. Beginning and end of the run motion capture data were analyzed. Vector coding was used to calculate 6 joint couples. Standard deviations of the coupling angles were used to identify variability within subphases of stance (loading, mid-stance, terminal, and pre-swing). Mixed between-within subjects ANOVAs compared differences between the foot strikes, pre and post run. Increased variability was identified within medial foot coupling for FFS and within lateral foot coupling for RFS during loading and mid-stance. The exhaustive run increased variability during mid-stance for both groups. Interpretation. Joint coupling variability profiles for FFS and RFS runners suggest different foot regions have varying coordination needs which should be considered when comparing the strike patterns.


Subject(s)
Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Exercise Test/methods , Foot Joints/physiology , Foot/physiology , Physical Exertion/physiology , Running/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Foot/anatomy & histology , Foot Joints/anatomy & histology , Gait/physiology , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Young Adult
4.
J Athl Train ; 56(8): 887-901, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33238005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) has high recurrence rates and minimal long-term treatment success. Central sensitization refers to dysfunctional pain modulation that occurs when nociceptive neurons become hyperresponsive. Researchers in this area of PFP have been increasingly productive in the past decade. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether evidence supports manifestations of central sensitization in individuals with PFP. DATA SOURCES: We searched MeSH terms for quantitative sensory testing (QST) pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), conditioned pain modulation (CPM), temporal summation, sensitization, hyperalgesia, and anterior knee pain or PFP in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, and EBSCOhost. STUDY SELECTION: Peer-reviewed studies that were written in English and published between 2005 and 2020 and investigated QST or pain mapping in a sample with PFP were included in this review. DATA EXTRACTION: The initial search yielded 140 articles. After duplicates were removed, 78 abstracts were reviewed. The full text of 21 studies was examined, and we included 15 studies in our evaluation: 6 in the meta-analysis, 4 in the systematic review, and 5 in both the meta-analysis and systematic review. DATA SYNTHESIS: A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for 4 QST variables (local PPTs, remote PPTs, CPM, temporal summation). Strong evidence supported lower local and remote PPTs, impaired CPM, and facilitated temporal summation in individuals with PFP compared with pain-free individuals. Evidence for heat and cold pain thresholds was conflicting. Pain mapping demonstrated expanding pain patterns associated with long duration of PFP symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Signs of central sensitization were present in individuals with PFP, indicating altered pain modulation. The etiologic and treatment models of PFP should reflect the current body of evidence regarding central sensitization. Signs of central sensitization should be monitored clinically, and treatments with central effects should be considered as part of a multimodal plan of care.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Sensitization , Pain/etiology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome , Humans , Pain Threshold , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/diagnosis , Quality of Life
5.
Ergonomics ; 63(5): 629-638, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191155

ABSTRACT

Military ruck marching with load carriage increases ground reaction forces, which are related to bone stress injuries (BSI). This study's purpose was to examine whether a ruck march increases impact loading and to describe muscular, physiological and perceived exertion in Army Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets. Secondary purposes examined relationships among loading changes after the ruck march and baseline characteristics. Fifteen Army ROTC cadets performed a 4-mile march. Lower extremity loading and muscular, physiological and perceived exertion were measured pre- and post-march. Results indicated significant increases in peak impact force and loading rate and decreases in ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength. Factors that might have been related to changes seen in lower extremity loading did not yield any compelling relationships to explain those changes. In conclusion, the ruck march led to increased peak impact force and loading rate, which have been shown to be related to the risk of BSI. Practitioner summary: This study examined ROTC cadets ankle strength and lower extremity loading before and after a ruck march. We found that lower extremity loading increased after the march, and ankle dorsiflexion (DF) strength decreased, despite the cadets not feeling fatigued. These changes are consistent with risk factors for bone stress injuries. Abbreviations: BSI: bone stress injury; ROTC: Reserve Officer Training Corps; PIF: peak impact force; LR: loading rate; RPE: rate of perceived exertion; APFT: Army physical fitness test; DF: dorsiflexors; PF: plantar-flexors; INV: invertors; EV: evertors; HHD: handheld dynamometer; %HRmax: percentage of maximum heart rate.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/physiology , Military Personnel , Physical Exertion , Walking , Weight-Bearing , Adolescent , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cumulative Trauma Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength , Risk Factors , Young Adult
6.
Knee ; 25(6): 1057-1064, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30414788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine reliability and validity of frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) and visual assessments (VA) in both males and females. METHODS: Fifty-four participants (30 females) performed lateral step-downs while kinematics were recorded by two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses. Two raters viewed the videos, extracted images, and measured the FPPA (quantitative). Using the videos, the raters also categorized (qualitative VA) each participant's motion as demonstrating dynamic valgus (>10° valgus), dynamic varus (>10° varus), or no change. Reliability was assessed for FPPA and VA using intraclass correlation coefficients and Kappa, respectively. Validity was determined by comparing the FPPA to three-dimensional measures (Pearson correlations) and comparing the VA to both FPPA and standard reference 3D kinematics (Kappa). RESULTS: FPPA showed good-excellent reliability (ICC = 0.850-0.998). VA showed minimal-moderate reliability (κ = 0.370-0.766). The FPPA showed large correlations (r = -0.514-0.531) with hip adduction in both sexes but only a moderate relationship with knee abduction in males (r = 0.427-0.445). VA showed no-weak (κ = 0.153-0.475) and weak-moderate (κ = 0.455-0.698) agreement compared to FPPA and no-weak (κ = -0.300-0.183) and no-minimal (κ = -0.078-0.027) disagreement compared to the reference standard 3D kinematics in males and females, respectively. CONCLUSION: The quantitative FPPA is more reliable and valid than qualitative VA of frontal knee plane motion.


Subject(s)
Exercise Test/methods , Knee Joint/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Motion , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Video Recording/methods , Young Adult
7.
J Athl Train ; 53(6): 545-552, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29893604

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common injury that interferes with quality of life and physical activity. Clinical subgroups of patients may exist, one of which is caused by proximal muscle dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical prediction rules that predict a positive outcome after either a hip and core- or knee-focused strengthening program for individuals with PFP. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized control trial. SETTING: Four university laboratories. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 199 participants with PFP. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomly allocated to either a hip and core-focused (n = 111) or knee-focused (n = 88) rehabilitation group for a 6-week program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Demographics, self-reported knee pain (visual analog scale) and function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale), hip strength, abdominal muscle endurance, and hip range of motion were evaluated at baseline. Treatment success was defined as a decrease in visual analog scale score by ≥2 cm or an increase in the Anterior Knee Pain Scale score by ≥8 points or both. Bivariate relationships between the outcome (treatment success) and the predictor variables were explored, followed by a forward stepwise logistic regression to predict a successful outcome. RESULTS: Patients with more pain, better function, greater lateral core endurance, and less anterior core endurance were more likely to have a successful outcome after hip and core strengthening (88% sensitivity and 54% specificity). Patients with lower weight, weaker hip internal rotation, stronger hip extension, and greater trunk-extension endurance were more likely to have success after knee strengthening (82% sensitivity and 58% specificity). CONCLUSION: The patients with PFP who have more baseline pain and yet maintain a high level of function may experience additional benefit from hip and core strengthening. The clinical prediction rules from this study remain in the developmental phase and should be applied with caution until externally validated.


Subject(s)
Hip/physiopathology , Knee/physiopathology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome , Quality of Life , Resistance Training/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain Measurement/methods , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/diagnosis , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/physiopathology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/psychology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/therapy , Range of Motion, Articular , Self Report , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Athl Train ; 52(5): 411-421, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28388232

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is typically exacerbated by repetitive activities that load the patellofemoral joint, such as running. Understanding the mediating effects of changes in pain in individuals with PFP might inform injury progression, rehabilitation, or both. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of changing pain on muscular strength and running biomechanics in those with PFP. DESIGN: Crossover study. SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen participants (10 men, 7 women) with PFP. INTERVENTION(S): Each participant completed knee pain-reducing and pain-inducing protocols in random order. The pain-reducing protocol consisted of 15 minutes of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) around the patella. The pain-inducing protocol was sets of 20 repeated single-legged squats (RSLS). Participants completed RSLS sets until either their pain was within at least 1 cm of their pain during an exhaustive run or they reached 10 sets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pain, isometric hip and trunk strength, and running mechanics were assessed before and after the protocols. Dependent variables were pain, normalized strength (abduction, extension, external rotation, lateral trunk flexion), and peak lower extremity kinematics and kinetics in all planes. Pain scores were analyzed using a Friedman test. Strength and mechanical variables were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. The α level was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Pain was decreased after the TENS (pretest: 3.10 ± 1.95, posttest: 1.89 ± 2.33) and increased after the RSLS (baseline: 3.10 ± 1.95, posttest: 4.38 ± 2.40) protocols (each P < .05). The RSLS protocol resulted in a decrease in hip-extension strength (baseline: 0.355 ± 0.08 kg/kg, posttest: 0.309 ± 0.09 kg/kg; P < .001). Peak plantar-flexion angle was decreased after RSLS (baseline: -13.97° ± 6.41°, posttest: -12.84° ± 6.45°; P = .003). Peak hip-extension (pretest: -2.31 ± 0.46) and hip-abduction (pretest: -2.02 ± 0.35) moments decreased after both the TENS (extension: -2.15 ± 0.48 Nm/kg, P = .015; abduction: -1.91 ± 0.33 Nm/kg, P = .015) and RSLS (extension: -2.18 ± 0.52 Nm/kg, P = .003; abduction: -1.87 ± 0.36 Nm/kg, P = .039) protocols. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel and effective method of increasing pain in persons with PFP. Functionally increased pain after RSLS coincides with reduced hip-extensor muscle strength and decreased plantar-flexion angle during running. The TENS treatment decreased pain during running in those with PFP but failed to influence strength. Hip moments were reduced by both protocols, which may demonstrate that acute increases or decreases in pain cause runners to change their mechanics.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Patellofemoral Joint , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Patellofemoral Joint/injuries , Patellofemoral Joint/physiopathology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/diagnosis , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/physiopathology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/therapy , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Running/physiology
9.
J Strength Cond Res ; 30(12): 3388-3395, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27870697

ABSTRACT

Gnacinski, SL, Cornell, DJ, Meyer, BB, Arvinen-Barrow, M, and Earl-Boehm, JE. Functional Movement Screen factorial validity and measurement invariance across sex among collegiate student-athletes. J Strength Cond Res 30(12): 3388-3395, 2016-The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a screening tool used to evaluate functional movement quality and subsequent musculoskeletal injury risk. Despite recent research on the factorial validity of the FMS, no confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been conducted to examine measurement invariance across sex among student-athletes. The primary purpose of the current study was to confirm the factor structure of the FMS measurement model in a collegiate student-athlete population. It was hypothesized that the 1-factor model would demonstrate better model fit than the recently proposed 2-factor model. The secondary purpose of the study was to examine FMS measurement invariance across sex using the previously identified measurement model. It was hypothesized that FMS measurement invariance would hold across sex. Male (n = 88) and female (n = 88) collegiate student-athletes completed FMS screening during the off-season. Factorial validity was examined using CFA procedures, and model parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood estimation. Measurement invariance was examined by comparison of fit indices between hierarchically constrained models. Results revealed support for both the 1- and the 2-factor models; however, the 2-factor model failed to fit the data significantly better than the 1-factor model. Results also indicated that measurement invariance did not hold across sex, indicating that the FMS sum score construct is not measured equivalently in male and female populations. Collectively, results provide evidence for the use of the unidimensional FMS sum score among collegiate student-athletes, yet prompt caution because it relates to the evaluation of sex differences in sum or movement pattern scores.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Mass Screening/methods , Movement/physiology , Students , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Test , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors , Young Adult
10.
J Athl Train ; 50(4): 366-77, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25365133

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common injury in running and jumping athletes. Randomized controlled trials suggest that incorporating hip and core strengthening (HIP) with knee-focused rehabilitation (KNEE) improves PFP outcomes. However, no randomized controlled trials have, to our knowledge, directly compared HIP and KNEE programs. OBJECTIVE: To compare PFP pain, function, hip- and knee-muscle strength, and core endurance between KNEE and HIP protocols after 6 weeks of rehabilitation. We hypothesized greater improvements in (1) pain and function, (2) hip strength and core endurance for patients with PFP involved in the HIP protocol, and (3) knee strength for patients involved in the KNEE protocol. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Four clinical research laboratories in Calgary, Alberta; Chicago, Illinois; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Augusta, Georgia. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Of 721 patients with PFP screened, 199 (27.6%) met the inclusion criteria (66 men [31.2%], 133 women [66.8%], age = 29.0 ± 7.1 years, height = 170.4 ± 9.4 cm, weight = 67.6 ± 13.5 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Patients with PFP were randomly assigned to a 6-week KNEE or HIP protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary variables were self-reported visual analog scale and Anterior Knee Pain Scale measures, which were conducted weekly. Secondary variables were muscle strength and core endurance measured at baseline and at 6 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, both the visual analog scale and the Anterior Knee Pain Scale improved for patients with PFP in both the HIP and KNEE protocols (P < .001), but the visual analog scale scores for those in the HIP protocol were reduced 1 week earlier than in the KNEE group. Both groups increased in strength (P < .001), but those in the HIP protocol gained more in hip-abductor (P = .01) and -extensor (P = .01) strength and posterior core endurance (P = .05) compared with the KNEE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the HIP and KNEE rehabilitation protocols produced improvements in PFP, function, and strength over 6 weeks. Although outcomes were similar, the HIP protocol resulted in earlier resolution of pain and greater overall gains in strength compared with the KNEE protocol.


Subject(s)
Muscle Strength/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/rehabilitation , Adult , Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Female , Hip/physiology , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Musculoskeletal Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/physiopathology , Resistance Training/methods , Running/injuries , Self Report , Treatment Outcome
11.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 29(7): 752-9, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24970112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dynamic knee stability is considered a critical factor in reducing anterior cruciate ligament loads. While the relationships between hamstring force production and anterior cruciate ligament loading are well known in vitro, the influence of hamstring strength to anterior cruciate ligament loading during athletic maneuvers remains unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of hamstring strength on anterior cruciate ligament loading during anticipated sidestep cut. METHODS: Seventeen recreationally active females were recruited to perform sidestep cutting maneuvers pre/post an acute hamstring strength reduction protocol. Kinematics and kinetics were calculated during the cut and a musculoskeletal model was used to estimate muscle, joint, and anterior cruciate ligament loads. Dependent t-tests were conducted to investigate differences between the two cutting conditions. FINDINGS: Anterior cruciate ligament loading increased by 36% due to reduced hamstring strength. This was mostly due to a 44% increase in sagittal plane loading and a 24% increase in frontal plane loading. Post strength reduction sidestep cuts were also performed with decreased anterior tibiofemoral shear force, an outcome that would theoretically reduce anterior cruciate ligament loading. However, the overall decrease in hamstring force production coupled with a more axial hamstring line of action yielded a net increase in anterior cruciate ligament loading. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that decreased hamstring strength significantly increases anterior cruciate ligament loading during anticipated sidestep cutting. Additionally, these results support the premise that preseason screening programs should monitor hamstring strength to identify female athletes with potential deficits and increased injury risk.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Exercise , Knee Joint/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Algorithms , Biomechanical Phenomena , Computer Simulation , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Knee Injuries/prevention & control , Movement , Reproducibility of Results , Sports/physiology , Stress, Mechanical , Thigh , Young Adult
12.
J Athl Train ; 49(2): 173-80, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24568226

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Identification of impaired balance as a risk factor for lower extremity injury regardless of injury history has led to subsequent investigation of variables that may adversely affect balance in healthy individuals. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship among core and lower extremity muscle function, foot posture, and balance. DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. SETTING: Musculoskeletal injury biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 individuals (40 men, 68 women; age = 22.8 ± 4.7 years, height = 168.5 ± 10.4 cm, mass = 69.9 ± 13.3 kg) participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Core endurance was assessed during 1 time-to-failure trial, and isometric hip and ankle strength were assessed using a handheld dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer, respectively. Foot structure was quantified using the digital photographic measurement method. Single-limb-stance time to boundary was assessed using a force plate during an eyes-closed condition. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed to predict balance using lower extremity strength, foot posture, and core endurance. RESULTS: Foot posture (ß = -0.22, P = .03) and ankle-inversion strength (ß = -0.29, P = .006) predicted mediolateral balance. Increasing arch posture and ankle-inversion strength were associated with decreased mediolateral single-limb-stance balance. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing arch height was associated with decreased mediolateral control of single-limb stance. The relationship between time to boundary and injury risk, however, has not been explored. Therefore, the relationship between increasing arch height and injury due to postural instability cannot be determined from this study. If authors of future prospective studies identify a relationship between decreased time to boundary and increased injury risk, foot structure may be an important variable to assess during preparticipation physical examinations. The relationship between increasing ankle-inversion strength and decreased balance may require additional study to further elucidate the relationship between ankle strength and balance.


Subject(s)
Foot/physiology , Lower Extremity/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Posture/physiology , Adult , Ankle/physiology , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Pronation/physiology , Young Adult
14.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 28(6): 655-63, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23810662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A key to understanding potential anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms is to determine joint loading characteristics associated with an injury-causing event. However, direct measurement of anterior cruciate ligament loading during athletic tasks is invasive. Thus, previous research has been unable to study the association between neuromuscular variables and anterior cruciate ligament loading. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of movement anticipation on anterior cruciate ligament loading using a musculoskeletal modeling approach. METHODS: Twenty healthy recreationally active females were recruited to perform anticipated and unanticipated sidestep cutting. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics of the right leg were calculated. Muscle, joint and anterior cruciate ligament forces were then estimated using a musculoskeletal model. Dependent t-tests were conducted to investigate differences between the two cutting conditions. FINDINGS: ACL loading significantly increased during unanticipated sidestep cutting (p<0.05). This increase was primarily due to a significant increase in the sagittal plane ACL loading, which contributed 62% of the total loading. Frontal plane ACL loading contributed 26% and transverse plane ACL loading contributed 12%. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that anterior cruciate ligament loading resulted from a multifaceted interaction of the sagittal plane shear forces (i.e., quadriceps, hamstrings, and tibiofemoral), as well as the frontal and transverse plane knee moments. Additionally, the results of this study confirm the hypothesis in the current literature that unanticipated movements such as sidestep cutting increase anterior cruciate ligament loading.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament/physiology , Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Knee/physiology , Movement/physiology , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Joints/physiology , Models, Biological , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Sports/physiology , Young Adult
15.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 45(7): 1331-9, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23377834

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of an exhaustive run on trunk and lower extremity strength and mechanics in patients with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP), we hypothesized that strength would decrease and mechanics would change after the exhaustive run. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with PFP and 19 controls participated (10 men and 9 women per group). Lower extremity and trunk mechanics during running, body mass-normalized strength, and pain assessments before and after an exhaustive run were quantified. A repeated-measures ANOVA was used to assess group differences and exhaustion-related changes (P < 0.05), with t-test post hoc analyses performed when significant interactions were identified (P < 0.0125). RESULTS: Pain significantly increased with the exhaustive run in the PFP group (P = 0.021). Hip strength was reduced after the exhaustive run, more so in those with PFP (abduction: before = 0.384 ± 0.08, after = 0.314 ± 0.08, P < 0.001; external rotation: before = 0.113 ± 0.02, after = 0.090 ± 0.02, P < 0.001). Persons with PFP also demonstrated increased knee flexion (before = 41.6° ± 5.5°, after = 46.9° ± 7.5°, P < 0.001), hip flexion (before = 30.4° ± 6.8°, after = 42.5° ± 9.7°, P < 0.001), and anterior pelvic tilt (before = 7.2° ± 5.1°, after = 13.3° ± 6.7°, P = 0.001) after the exhaustive run compared to controls. Trunk flexion increased in both PFP (before = 13.09° ± 6.2°, after = 16.31° ± 5.3°, P < 0.001) and control (before = 1393° ± 4.7°, after = 15.99° ± 5.9°, P < 0.001) groups. Hip extension (before = -2.09 ± 0.49 N · m · kg(-1), after = -2.49 ± 0.54 N · m · kg(-1), P = 0.002) moments increased only in subjects with PFP. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaustive running results in reduced hip strength in subjects with PFP; however, this did not result in changes to hip internal rotation or adduction kinematics. Kinematic and kinetic changes after the exhaustive run are more indicative of compensatory changes to reduce pain. Increasing trunk flexion during running might provide pain relief during running; however, reducing anterior pelvic tilt may also warrant attention during treatment.


Subject(s)
Muscle Strength/physiology , Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome/physiopathology , Running/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Biomechanical Phenomena , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hip Joint/physiology , Hip Joint/physiopathology , Humans , Knee Joint/physiology , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Muscle Strength Dynamometer , Range of Motion, Articular , Young Adult
16.
J Appl Biomech ; 28(5): 608-15, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23193068

ABSTRACT

The effect of time-to-boundary minima selection and stability limit definition was investigated during eyes open and eyes closed condition single-limb stance postural stability. Anteroposterior and mediolateral time-to-boundary were computed using the mean and standard deviation (SD) of all time-to-boundary minima during a trial, and the mean and SD of only the 10 absolute time-to-boundary minima. Time-to-boundary with rectangular, trapezoidal, and multisegmented polygon defined stability limits were also calculated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test results revealed significant medium-large correlations between anteroposterior and mediolateral time-to-boundary scores calculated using both the mean and SD of the 10 absolute time-to-boundary minima and of all the time-to-boundary minima. Friedman test results revealed significant mediolateral time-to-boundary differences between boundary shape definitions. Follow-up Wilcoxon signed rank test results revealed significant differences between the rectangular boundary shape and both the trapezoidal and multisegmented polygon shapes during the eyes open and eyes closed conditions when both the mean and the SD of the time-to-boundary minima were used to represent postural stability. Significant differences were also revealed between the trapezoidal and multisegmented polygon definitions during the eyes open condition when the SD of the time-to-boundary minima was used to represent postural stability. Based on these findings, the overall results (i.e., stable versus unstable participants or groups) of studies computing postural stability using different minima selection can be compared. With respect to boundary shape, the trapezoid or multisegmented polygon shapes may be more appropriate than the rectangular shape as they more closely represent the anatomical shape of the stance foot.


Subject(s)
Leg/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Adult , Female , Foot/physiology , Humans , Kinesthesis/physiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Touch/physiology , Vision, Ocular , Young Adult
17.
J Athl Train ; 47(1): 15-23, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22488226

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Lower extremity overuse injuries are associated with gluteus medius (GMed) weakness. Understanding the activation of muscles about the hip during strengthening exercises is important for rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the electromyographic activity produced by the gluteus medius (GMed), tensor fascia latae (TFL), anterior hip flexors (AHF), and gluteus maximus (GMax) during 3 hip-strengthening exercises: hip abduction (ABD), hip abduction with external rotation (ABD-ER), and clamshell (CLAM) exercises. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twenty healthy runners (9 men, 11 women; age = 25.45 ± 5.80 years, height = 1.71 ± 0.07 m, mass = 64.43 ± 7.75 kg) participated. INTERVENTION(S): A weight equal to 5% body mass was affixed to the ankle for the ABD and ABD-ER exercises, and an equivalent load was affixed for the CLAM exercise. A pressure biofeedback unit was placed beneath the trunk to provide positional feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surface electromyography (root mean square normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction) was recorded over the GMed, TFL, AHF, and GMax. RESULTS: Three 1-way, repeated-measures analyses of variance indicated differences for muscle activity among the ABD (F(3,57) = 25.903, P < .001), ABD-ER (F(3,57) = 10.458, P < .001), and CLAM (F(3,57) = 4.640, P = .006) exercises. For the ABD exercise, the GMed (70.1 ± 29.9%), TFL (54.3 ± 19.1%), and AHF (28.2 ± 21.5%) differed in muscle activity. The GMax (25.3 ± 24.6%) was less active than the GMed and TFL but was not different from the AHF. For the ABD-ER exercise, the TFL (70.9 ± 17.2%) was more active than the AHF (54.3 ± 24.8%), GMed (53.03 ± 28.4%), and GMax (31.7 ± 24.1%). For the CLAM exercise, the AHF (54.2 ± 25.2%) was more active than the TFL (34.4 ± 20.1%) and GMed (32.6 ± 16.9%) but was not different from the GMax (34.2 ± 24.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The ABD exercise is preferred if targeted activation of the GMed is a goal. Activation of the other muscles in the ABD-ER and CLAM exercises exceeded that of GMed, which might indicate the exercises are less appropriate when the primary goal is the GMed activation and strengthening.


Subject(s)
Hip Joint/physiology , Isometric Contraction , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Resistance Training , Running/physiology , Adult , Athletes , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...