Patient-Reported Outcomes to Describe Global Health and Family Relationships in Pediatric Weight Management.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can assess chronic health. The study aims were to pilot a survey through the PEDSnet Healthy Weight Network (HWN), collecting PROs in tertiary care pediatric weight management programs (PWMP) in the United States, and demonstrate that a 50% enrollment rate was feasible; describe PROs in this population; and explore the relationship between child/family characteristics and PROs. Methods: Participants included 12- to 18-year-old patients and parents of 5- to 18-year-olds receiving care at PWMP in eight HWN sites. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures assessed global health (GH), fatigue, stress, and family relationships (FR). T-score cut points defined poor GH or FR or severe fatigue or stress. Generalized estimating equations explored relationships between patient/family characteristics and PROMIS measures. Results: Overall, 63% of eligible parents and 52% of eligible children enrolled. Seven sites achieved the goal enrollment for parents and four for children. Participants included 1447 children. By self-report, 44.6% reported poor GH, 8.6% poor FR, 9.3% severe fatigue, and 7.6% severe stress. Multiple-parent household was associated with lower odds of poor GH by parent proxy report [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.88] and poor FR by self-report (aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.74). Parents were significantly more likely to report that the child had poor GH and poor FR when a child had multiple households. Conclusions: PROs were feasibly assessed across the HWN, although implementation varied by site. Nearly half of the children seeking care in PWMP reported poor GH, and family context may play a role. Future work may build on this pilot to show how PROs can inform clinical care in PWMP.

Differences in Health Care Needs, Health Care Utilization, and Health Care Outcomes Among Children With Special Health Care Needs in Ohio: A Comparative Analysis Between Medicaid and Private Insurance.

OBJECTIVE: This study explores comparative differentials in health care needs, health care utilization, and health status between Medicaid and private/employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) among a statewide population of children with special health care needs (CSHCN) in Ohio. METHODS: We used data from the 2012 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey to examine CSHCN's health care needs, utilization, status, and health outcomes by insurance type. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore associations between public and private health insurance, as well as the utilization and health outcome variables. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses indicate that the Medicaid population had higher care coordination needs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2) as well as need for mental/educational health care services (OR = 1.5; 95% CI; 1.1-2.0). They also reported higher unmet dental care needs (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.0), higher emergency department (ED) utilization (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7-3.2), and worse overall health (OR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7), oral health (OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5), and vision health (OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6). After controlling for demographic variables, CSHCN with Medicaid insurance coverage were more likely to need mental health and education services (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.8; 95% CI; 1.2-2.6), had significantly more ED visits (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.5), and were less likely to have excellent overall health (AOR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9), oral health (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7), and vision health (AOR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6) than those with private insurance/ESI. CONCLUSION: The CSHCN population is a highly vulnerable population. While Ohio's Medicaid provides greater coverage to CSHCN, disparities continue to exist within access and services that Medicaid provides versus the ones provided by private insurance/ESI.