Lessons learned about prevalence and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms from a 25-year ultrasound population screening programme.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess how the prevalence and growth rates of small and medium abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) (3·0-5·4 cm) have changed over time in men aged 65 years, and to evaluate long-term outcomes in men whose aortic diameter is 2·6-2·9 cm (subaneurysmal), and below the standard threshold for most surveillance programmes. METHODS: The Gloucestershire Aneurysm Screening Programme (GASP) started in 1990. Men aged 65 years with an aortic diameter of 2·6-5·4 cm, measured by ultrasonography using the inner to inner wall method, were included in surveillance. Aortic diameter growth rates were estimated separately for men who initially had a subaneurysmal aorta, and those who had a small or medium AAA, using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Since 1990, 81 150 men had ultrasound screening for AAA (uptake 80·7 per cent), of whom 2795 had an aortic diameter of 2·6-5·4 cm. The prevalence of screen-detected AAA of 3·0 cm or larger decreased from 5·0 per cent in 1991 to 1·3 per cent in 2015. There was no evidence of a change in AAA growth rates during this time. Of men who initially had a subaneurysmal aorta, 57·6 (95 per cent c.i. 54·4 to 60·7) per cent were estimated to develop an AAA of 3·0 cm or larger within 5 years of the initial scan, and 28·0 (24·2 to 31·8) per cent to develop a large AAA (at least 5·5 cm) within 15 years. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of screen-detected small and medium AAAs has decreased over the past 25 years, but growth rates have remained similar. Men with a subaneurysmal aorta at age 65 years have a substantial risk of developing a large AAA by the age of 80 years.

Editor's Choice - Inequalities in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening in England: Effects of Social Deprivation and Ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men is currently ongoing in several countries. The aim was to examine the effects of deprivation and ethnicity on uptake of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and prevalence of AAA. METHODS: This was a review of outcomes from a population screening programme using data collected contemporaneously on a bespoke national database. Men aged 65 in two annual cohorts (2013/14 and 2014/15) were invited for AAA screening. Attendance and prevalence of AAA (aortic diameter >2.9 cm) were recorded. Results were compared according to measures of social deprivation and recorded ethnicity. RESULTS: Some 593,032 men were invited and 461,898 attended for ultrasound screening; uptake 77.9%. Uptake was related to social deprivation: 65.1% in the most deprived decile, 84.1% in the least deprived: OR for least deprived 2.84, 95% CI 2.76-2.92, p<.0001. Men in deprived areas were more likely to actively decline screening: 6% versus 3.8% in the least deprived decile. AAA were twice as common in the most deprived compared with the least deprived decile: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.77-2.27, p<.0001. AAA were more common in white British men than in black (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.71) or Asian (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.13-0.26) men. There was considerable local variation in all findings. CONCLUSIONS: Social deprivation affects uptake of AAA screening in 65 year old men. Local factors are the most important determinants of uptake, so solutions to improve uptake must be designed at local, not national level.

Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme.

BACKGROUND: The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Screening Programme was introduced by the National Health Service (NHS) in England to reduce the rate of death from ruptured AAA in men. The programme commenced in 2009 and was implemented completely across the country in April 2013. The aim was to review the first 5 years of the programme, looking specifically at compliance and early outcome. METHODS: Men aged 65 years were invited for a single abdominal ultrasound scan. Data were entered into a bespoke database (AAA SMaRT). This was a planned analysis after the first 5 years of the programme. RESULTS: The summation analysis involved the first 700 000 men screened, and the first 1000 men with a large AAA referred for possible treatment. The prevalence of AAA (aortic diameter larger than 2·9 cm) in 65-year-old men was 1·34 per cent. Mean uptake was 78·1 per cent, but varied from 61·7 to 85·8 per cent across the country. Based on the Index of Multiple Deprivation, uptake was 65·1 per cent in the most deprived versus 84·1 per cent in the least deprived areas. Of the first 1000 men referred for possible treatment of a large AAA (greater than 5·4 cm), the false-positive rate was 3·2 per cent. Some 870 men underwent a planned AAA intervention (non-intervention rate 9·2 per cent), with seven deaths (perioperative mortality rate 0·8 per cent). CONCLUSION: The processes in the NHS AAA Screening Programme are effective in detecting and treating men with AAA.

Outcome in Men with a Screen-detected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Who are not Fit for Intervention.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in Gloucestershire has been ongoing for 25 years. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of a cohort of men with a large (> 5.4 cm) screen-detected AAA who did not have early intervention for their AAA. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was interrogated for a 10-year interval from 2001 to 2011. Men who did not have their large AAA repaired within 3 months of the diagnosis were identified. The reasons for initial nonintervention and subsequent outcomes were identified from a combination of hospital case notes and general practitioner records. RESULTS: Of 334 men referred, 59 (median age 71 years, range 62-83 years) did not have intervention within 3 months (initial nonintervention rate 17.6%). The reasons included placed back on surveillance after assessment (n = 34); immediately discharged (n = 12); required further investigations (n = 5); died before complete assessment (n = 3); and incomplete follow-up (n = 5). Sixteen men had delayed AAA repair with no perioperative mortality. Overall mortality in the study was 14/34 (nine from ruptured AAA, the rest from medical conditions). Two further men survived repair of a ruptured AAA. The overall rate of ruptured AAA was 11/59 (18.6%). CONCLUSION: Information from studies such as these can be used to help plan treatment of men with a large AAA and to compare performance of vascular units.

Endovascular management of isolated iliac artery aneurysms.

Isolated iliac artery aneuryms are detected increasingly as a result of expanding use of diagnostic imaging, and screening programmes. This present review describes endovascular solutions for the management of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. This was a review of the published literature on endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysms. Most of the papers were case series, and there are no randomized studies. Aneurysms of the common iliac artery are most common, followed by internal, then external iliac aneurysms. Indications for intervention remain unclear, but are generally based on diameter. Endovascular solutions exist for at least half the aneurysms that required treatment, including as an emergency. Often a standard bifurcated solution, as for abdominal aortic aneurysm is indicated, however, there are a number of other novel solutions to deal with variable anatomy. Endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysms is less painful and reduces hospital stay. However, outcome data remain limited, and formal comparison with open surgery is awaited.

Hospital trends of admissions and procedures for acute leg ischaemia in England, 2000-2011.

INTRODUCTION: Acute leg ischaemia (ALI) is a common vascular emergency for which new minimally invasive treatment options were introduced in the 1990s. The aim of this study was to determine recent hospital trends for ALI in England and to assess whether the introduction of the new treatment modalities had affected management. METHODS: Routine hospital data covering ALI were provided by Hospital Episode Statistics for the years 2000 to 2011 and mortality data were obtained from the Office for National Statistics. All data were age standardised, reported per 100,000 of the population, and stratified by age band (60-74 years and ≥75 years) and sex. RESULTS: Hospital admissions have risen significantly from 60.3 to 94.3 per 100,000 of the population, with an average annual increase of 6.2% since 2003 (p<0.001). The rise was greater in the older age group (from 79.9 to 134.4 vs 49.3 to 73.0) and yet procedures for ALI have shown a significant decrease since 2000 from 14.3 to 12.4 per 100,000 (p=0.013), independent of age and sex. Open embolectomy of the femoral artery remains the most common procedure and the proportion of endovascular interventions showed only a small increase. Only a few deaths were attributed to ALI (range: 95-150 deaths per year). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital workload for ALI has increased, particularly since 2003, but this trend does not appear to have translated into increased endovascular or surgical activity.

Survey of management of common iliac artery aneurysms by members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether the current management of common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) by vascular surgeons is in tune with existing guidelines for referral. METHODS: This was a postal survey of members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. The main outcome measures were relative frequency of ruptured CIAA, respondents' size threshold for surveillance versus intervention, and their management strategies for isolated unilateral CIAAs, bilateral CIAAs and aortoiliac aneurysms. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-four (anonymous) replies were received (48% response rate). Respondents estimated that a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was 25 times more common than a ruptured CIAA. Most surgeons (64%) would wait until a CIAA reached 4 cm in diameter before considering intervention. This threshold was not affected by other scenarios such as the presence of a bilateral CIAA or a small (4 cm) AAA. Eighty per cent of surgeons would treat a non-ruptured CIAA by stenting, where possible. The majority of surgeons felt that ultrasonography surveillance should be commenced when a CIAA exceeds 1.5 cm, with a surveillance interval of 1 year but with more frequent surveillance for CIAAs wider than 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Existing guidelines that recommend referral for possible intervention for non-ruptured CIAAs at a diameter of 3 cm are out of tune with current practice. Most surgeons in this survey would wait until the diameter was 4 cm.