ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Post-transfusion survival of donor red blood cells (RBCs) is important for effective chronic transfusion therapy in conditions including sickle cell disease (SCD). Biotin labeling RBCs allows direct in vivo measurement of multiple donor RBC units simultaneously post-transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In an observational trial of patients with SCD receiving monthly chronic transfusion therapy, aliquots of RBCs from one transfusion episode were biotin-labeled and infused along with the unlabeled RBC units. Serial blood samples were obtained to measure RBC survival. Donor units were tested for RBC indices, hemoglobin fractionation, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme activity. For microcytic donor RBCs (MCV < 70 fL), HBA1 and HBA2 genetic testing was performed on whole blood. RESULTS: We present one recipient, a pediatric patient with SCD and splenectomy who received two RBC units with aliquots from each unit labeled at distinct biotin densities (2 and 18 µg/mL biotin). One donor unit was identified to have microcytosis (MCV 68.5 fL after biotinylation); whole blood sample obtained at a subsequent donation showed 2-gene deletion alpha-thalassemia trait (É-3.7kb/É-3.7kb) and normal serum ferritin. G6PD activity was >60% of normal mean for both. The RBCs with alpha-thalassemia RBC had accelerated clearance and increased surface phosphatidylserine post-transfusion, as compared with the normocytic RBC (half life 65 vs. 86 days, respectively). DISCUSSION: Post-transfusion RBC survival may be lower for units from donors with alpha-thalassemia trait, although the impact of thalassemia trait donors on transfusion efficacy requires further study.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Blood Donors , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Erythrocytes , alpha-Thalassemia , Humans , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Anemia, Sickle Cell/blood , alpha-Thalassemia/therapy , alpha-Thalassemia/blood , Erythrocytes/metabolism , Male , Cell Survival , Biotinylation , Female , ChildABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Injuries in younger baseball athletes continue to increase despite work characterizing risk factors. Three-dimensional (3D) motion capture may identify suboptimal pitching mechanics that predispose an athlete to injury, but 3D-motion analysis is often inaccessible. Thus, there is a gap between the current biomechanics literature and its practical application in young athletes. The current study aims to assess the reliability of the pitch efficiency rating (PER) as a systematic tool to evaluate throwing mechanics in developing baseball pitchers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of application and reliability of a novel, scientifically informed tool (PER) for the assessment of pitching mechanics. DESIGN: Reliability study using Bland-Altman methods for assessing agreement between two raters. SETTING: Academic medical center through community outreach. PARTICIPANTS: Pitching mechanics were assessed and rated with the PER for 40 athletes (26 high school, 14 Division III), average age 19.0 years old (range 15.3-23.7 years old). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interrater and intrarater reliability as calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For initial readings comparing interrater reliability between Rater 1 and Rater 2, the ICC was calculated at 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.89) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60-0.86) for the second set of ratings. Regarding intrarater reliability across reads, ICC was found to be 0.63 (95% CI 0.43-0.79) for Rater 1, and 0.91 for Rater 2 (95% CI 0.85-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The present study introduces the PER as a potential tool for evaluating pitching mechanics. However, the intrarater reliability of the PER did not meet preestablished criteria in one of the two pilot raters. Further study is needed to continue to assess the reliability of the tool across diverse demographics.
Subject(s)
Baseball , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Feasibility Studies , Risk Factors , Biomechanical PhenomenaABSTRACT
Nonhuman primates used in biomedical research may experience clinically significant weight loss for a variety of reasons. Episodes of anorexia (complete loss of appetite) or hyporexia (decreased appetite) can result in significant weight loss, potentially altering animal welfare and scientific studies. The FDA has approved several appetite stimulants for use in domestic species, but currently none are approved for use in NHP. Treatment of inappetence and weight loss in NHP often relies on the extralabel use of these compounds. Capromorelin is a ghrelin receptor agonist. As a growth hormone secretagogue, capromorelin increases appetite, leading to weight gain. Studies in several species have shown a positive correlation between capromorelin administration and weight gain; in 2017, an oral solution of capromorelin received FDA approval for use in dogs. We tested this solution in healthy adult rhesus macaques (n = 3 males and 3 females) for its effects on body weight and insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). A control group (n = 2 males and 2 females) was used for comparison. Treated macaques received a 3mg/kg oral dose daily for 7 d. Clinical signs were observed daily. Weights were collected before, during and at the end of treatment. Blood was drawn before, during and after treatment for measurement of IGF-1 levels and standard hematology and biochemistry parameters. Baseline-adjusted mean body weights and IGF-1 levels were significantly higher in treated as compared with control monkeys after 7 d of beginning treatment (body weight of 10.5±0.1kg (mean ± SEM) and 10.1±0.1kg, respectively; IGF-1 of 758±43ng/mL and 639±22ng/mL, respectively). Capromorelin administration was not associated with appreciable changes in hematologic and biochemical values in treated macaques. These findings suggest that capromorelin may be useful for treating inappetence and weight loss in NHP, and based on blood analysis, a 7-d course of treatment does not appear to cause acute toxicity.
Subject(s)
Macaca mulatta , Animals , Male , Female , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis , Appetite Stimulants/therapeutic use , Appetite Stimulants/administration & dosage , Appetite Stimulants/pharmacology , Body Weight/drug effects , Weight Gain/drug effects , Weight Loss/drug effects , Receptors, Ghrelin/agonists , Piperidines , PyrazolesABSTRACT
Various types of cellular injection have become a popular and costly treatment option for patients with knee osteoarthritis despite a paucity of literature establishing relative efficacy to each other or corticosteroid injections. Here we aimed to identify the safety and efficacy of cell injections from autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate, autologous adipose stromal vascular fraction and allogeneic human umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, in comparison to corticosteroid injection (CSI). The study was a phase 2/3, four-arm parallel, multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial with 480 patients with a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence II-IV). Participants were randomized to the three different arms with a 3:1 distribution. Arm 1: autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (n = 120), CSI (n = 40); arm 2: umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (n = 120), CSI (n = 40); arm 3: stromal vascular fraction (n = 120), CSI (n = 40). The co-primary endpoints were the visual analog scale pain score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain score at 12 months versus baseline. Analyses of our primary endpoints, with 440 patients, revealed that at 1 year post injection, none of the three orthobiologic injections was superior to another, or to the CSI control. In addition, none of the four groups showed a significant change in magnetic resonance imaging osteoarthritis score compared to baseline. No procedure-related serious adverse events were reported during the study period. In summary, this study shows that at 1 year post injection, there was no superior orthobiologic as compared to CSI for knee osteoarthritis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03818737.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Single-Blind Method , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PROBLEM: In pregnancy, lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with adverse outcomes, which is partly attributed to chronic inflammation. Our study compared the maternal serum cytokine profiles in patients with low and high SES. METHOD OF STUDY: This retrospective cohort study compared maternal serum cytokine profiles between Medicaid-insured patients who delivered at an urban safety-net hospital (low SES) and privately-insured patients who delivered at a community-based academic hospital (high SES) in Atlanta, GA (n = 32-33/group). Serum samples were obtained during prenatal venipuncture from 13 to 38 weeks' gestation and the cohorts were matched by gestational age. Interferon (IFN)-γ, Interleukin (IL)-10, IL-1ß, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α were assayed from maternal serum samples using a standard ELISA assay. RESULTS: Median concentrations of IL-6, a promotor of chronic inflammation, were higher in the low SES group (0.85 vs. 0.49 pg/mL, p < .001), while median levels of IL-1ß, a potent monocyte activator, and TNF-α, a master regulator of acute inflammation, were lower in the low SES group (0.09 vs. 0.46 pg/mL, p < .001, and 1.23 vs. 1.58 pg/mL, p = .002, respectively) as compared to the high SES group. After adjusting for maternal age, obesity, hypertensive disorders, and gestational age at delivery, the differences in IL-6 and IL-1ß by SES persisted (p = .0002 and p < .0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort study, there were significant differences in levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines during pregnancy for groups defined by SES, even after adjustment for confounding variables. Our data are foundational for further research to investigate SES-associated inflammation that may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cytokines , Interleukin-6 , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Inflammation , Social ClassABSTRACT
Objective: Poor diet quality contributes to metabolic dysfunction. This study aimed to gain a greater understanding of the relationship between dietary macronutrient quality and glucose homeostasis in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Design: This was a cross-sectional study of N = 27 adults with CF with glucose tolerance ranging from normal (n = 9) to prediabetes (n = 6) to being classified as having cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD, n = 12). Fasted blood was collected for analysis of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. Insulin resistance was assessed by Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR). Subjects without known CFRD also underwent a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. Three-day food records were used to assess macronutrient sources. Dietary variables were adjusted for energy intake. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Spearman correlations, and multiple linear regression. Results: Individuals with CFRD consumed less total fat and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) compared to those with normal glucose tolerance (p < 0.05). In Spearman correlation analyses, dietary glycemic load was inversely associated with C-peptide (rho = -0.28, p = 0.05). Total dietary fat, MUFA, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were positively associated with C-peptide (rho = 0.39-0.41, all p < 0.05). Plant protein intake was inversely related to HOMA2-IR (rho = -0.28, p = 0.048). Associations remained significant after adjustment for age and sex. Discussion: Improvements in diet quality are needed in people with CF. This study suggests that higher unsaturated dietary fat, higher plant protein, and higher carbohydrate quality were associated with better glucose tolerance indicators in adults with CF. Larger, prospective studies in individuals with CF are needed to determine the impact of diet quality on the development of CFRD.
ABSTRACT
Retention in HIV care and viral suppression rates remain suboptimal, especially among people with HIV (PWH) facing complex barriers to care such as mental health conditions, substance use disorders, and housing insecurity. The Center for Adherence, Retention, and Engagement Support (CARES) program utilizes an interdisciplinary team that delivers integrated services in a drop-in setting to provide individualized care to PWH with complex psychosocial needs. We describe the CARES program and evaluate its effectiveness in retaining patients in care to achieve virological suppression. We characterized 119 referrals of PWH experiencing homelessness, mental health conditions, and substance use disorders to CARES between 2011 and 2017, and collected data for a 24-month observation period through 2019. Outcomes of patients who participated in CARES were compared with those who were referred but did not participate. The primary outcome was viral suppression (<200 copies/mL) at least once during 2-year follow-up. Retention in care (≥2 completed medical visits ≥90 days apart in each year post-referral) was a secondary outcome. Of 119 PWH referred to CARES, 59 participated with ≥2 visits. Those who participated in CARES were more likely to achieve viral suppression [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-10.32] and to be retained in care (aOR 3.73, 95% CI 1.52-9.14) compared with those who were referred but did not participate. This analysis found that the CARES program improved retention in care and viral suppression among PWH with complex psychosocial needs and suggests that it may represent a useful model for future programming.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Retention in Care , Humans , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/psychology , Viral LoadABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Pregnant patients face greater morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 related illness than their non-pregnant peers. Previous research in non-pregnant patients established that poor clinical outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted to the ICU were correlated with a significant increase in the proinflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10. Importantly, high levels of these inflammatory markers have also been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including spontaneous preterm birth, preeclampsia, and severe respiratory disease. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study that compared the serum inflammatory cytokine profiles of pregnant patients with acute/post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection to those with previous exposure. All subjects in both cohorts tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies; however, those in the acute/post-acute infection cohort had a documented positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) result within 30 days of serum sample collection. Serum samples were obtained during prenatal venipuncture from 13 to 39 weeks' gestation and the cohorts were matched by gestational age. The inflammatory cytokines interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-10, IL-1ß, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were assayed from maternal serum using a standard ELISA assay and median cytokine concentrations were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We enrolled 50 non-Hispanic Black patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection who received prenatal care at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. Those with acute/post-acute infection (n = 22) had significantly higher concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody, IL-10, IL-1ß, and IL-8, while patients with previous exposure (n = 28) had significantly higher concentrations of IL-4. There were no significant inter-group differences in medical comorbidities. Pregnant patients with acute/post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection had significantly higher serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines as compared to those with previous exposure, suggesting that, like in the non-pregnant population, SARS-CoV-2 infection alters the levels of circulating proinflammatory markers during pregnancy. The increased levels of cytokines may contribute to the adverse obstetric outcomes observed with COVID-19 illness.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interleukin-10 , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Interleukin-4 , Interleukin-6 , Interleukin-8 , Pregnancy Outcome , CytokinesABSTRACT
Maintenance immunosuppression with belatacept following kidney transplantation results in improved long-term graft function as compared with calcineurin inhibitors. However, broad application of belatacept has been limited, in part related to logistical barriers surrounding a monthly (q1m) infusion requirement. Methods: To determine whether every 2-mo (q2m) belatacept is noninferior to standard q1m maintenance, we conducted a prospective, single-center randomized trial in low-immunologic-risk, stable renal transplant recipients. Here, post hoc analysis of 3-y outcomes, including renal function and adverse events, are reported. Results: One hundred sixty-three patients received treatment in the q1m control group (n = 82) or q2m study group (n = 81). Renal allograft function as measured by baseline-adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate was not significantly different between groups (time-averaged mean difference of 0.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval: -2.5, 2.9). There were no statistically significant differences in time to death or graft loss, freedom from rejection, or freedom from donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). During the extended 12- to 36-mo follow-up, 3 deaths, 1 graft loss occurred in the q1m group, compared with 2 deaths, and 2 graft losses in the q2m group. In the q1m group, 1 patient developed DSAs and acute rejection. In the q2m group, 3 patients developed DSAs and 2 associated with acute rejection. Conclusions: Based on the similar renal function and survival at 36 mo compared with q1m, q2m belatacept is a potentially viable maintenance immunosuppressive strategy in low immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients that may facilitate increased clinical utilization of costimulation blockade-based immunosuppression.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: After stroke, increases in contralesional primary motor cortex (M1CL) activity and excitability have been reported. In pre-clinical studies, M1CL reorganization is related to the extent of ipsilesional M1 (M1IL) injury, but this has yet to be tested clinically. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that the extent of damage to the ipsilesional M1 and/or its corticospinal tract (CST) determines the magnitude of M1CL reorganization and its relationship to affected hand function in humans recovering from stroke. METHODS: Thirty-five participants with a single subacute ischemic stroke affecting M1 or CST and hand paresis underwent MRI scans of the brain to measure lesion volume and CST lesion load. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1IL was used to determine the presence of an electromyographic response (motor evoked potential (MEP+ and MEP-)). M1CL reorganization was determined by TMS applied to M1CL at increasing intensities. Hand function was quantified with the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test. RESULTS: The extent of M1CL reorganization was related to greater lesion volume in the MEP- group, but not in the MEP+ group. Greater M1CL reorganization was associated with more impaired hand function in MEP- but not MEP+ participants. Absence of an MEP (MEP-), larger lesion volumes and higher lesion loads in CST, particularly in CST fibers originating in M1 were associated with greater impairment of hand function. CONCLUSIONS: In the subacute post-stroke period, stroke volume and M1IL output determine the extent of M1CL reorganization and its relationship to affected hand function, consistent with pre-clinical evidence.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02544503.
Subject(s)
Motor Cortex , Stroke , Humans , Stroke Volume , Brain , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To improve our understanding of the immune response, including the neutralization antibody response, following COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study comprising patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and patients who received both doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273, BNT162b2) in pregnancy recruited from two hospitals in Atlanta, GA, USA. Maternal blood and cord blood at delivery were assayed for anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, IgA and IgM, and neutralizing antibody. The detection of antibodies, titers, and maternal to fetal transfer ratios were compared. RESULTS: Nearly all patients had detectable RBD-binding IgG in maternal and cord samples. The vaccinated versus infected cohort had a significantly greater proportion of cord samples with detectable neutralizing antibody (94% vs. 28%, P < 0.001) and significantly higher transfer ratios for RBD-specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies with a transfer efficiency of 105% (vs. 80%, P < 0.001) and 110% (vs. 90%, P < 0.001), respectively. There was a significant linear decline in maternal and cord blood RBD-specific IgG and neutralizing antibody titers as time from vaccination to delivery increased. CONCLUSIONS: Those who receive the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine mount an immune response that is equivalent to-if not greater than-those naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy.
Subject(s)
2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , COVID-19 , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , Antibody Formation , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , RNA, Messenger , Immunoglobulin G , Antibodies, Viral , VaccinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Healthcare transition from pediatric to adult-oriented clinical settings is often viewed as a high-risk time for care disengagement. However, there is a paucity of prospective, longitudinal research documenting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care outcomes after healthcare transition. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of healthcare transition among youth enrolled at an HIV care center in Atlanta, Georgia. Pediatric clinic patients (average age, 24 years) were enrolled up to 3 months before the expected transition and were followed up to determine linkage, retention, and viral suppression in adult care through electronic medical record abstractions at the baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: The majority of our cohort (n = 70) was male (88.6%) and black (92.9%) and acquired HIV horizontally (80%). Most of our cohort was linked to adult care by 12 months (84%) after enrollment. Of those who linked to adult care by 12 months, retention rates were 86% (95% confidence interval, 78%-94%) at 6 months, 76% (66%-86%) at 12 months, and 66% (55%-78%) at 18 and 24 months. Once in adult care, the proportion with viral suppression was stable (73% at baseline and 74%, 77%, 67%, and 78% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although most youth successfully linked to adult care, retention rates decreased over the 24-month follow-up period. Rates of viral suppression were stable for those who remained in care. Strategies to support retention in adult care will be critical to optimizing this transition for youth with HIV.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Transition to Adult Care , Adult , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Child , Young Adult , Georgia/epidemiology , HIV , Prospective Studies , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Continuity of Patient Care , Viral LoadABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Overlapping surgery, in which one attending surgeon manages two overlapping operating rooms (ORs) and is present for all the critical portions of each procedure, is an important policy that improves healthcare access for patients and case volumes for surgeons and surgical trainees. Despite several studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy of overlapping neurosurgical operations, the practice of overlapping surgery remains controversial. To date, there are no studies that have investigated long-term complication rates of overlapping functional and stereotactic neurosurgical procedures. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the 1-year complication rates and OR times for nonoverlapping versus overlapping functional procedures. The secondary objective was to gain insight into what types of complications are the most prevalent and test for differences between groups. METHODS: Seven hundred eighty-three functional neurosurgical cases were divided into two cohorts, nonoverlapping (n = 342) and overlapping (n = 441). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scale score was used to compare the preoperative risk for both cohorts. A complication was defined as any surgically related reason that required readmission, reoperation, or an unplanned emergency department or clinic visit that required intervention. Complications were subdivided into infectious and noninfectious. Chi-square tests, independent-samples t-tests, and uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine significance. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean ASA scale score (2.7 ± 0.6 for both groups, p = 0.997) or overall complication rates (8.8% nonoverlapping vs 9.8% overlapping, p = 0.641) between the two cohorts. Infections accounted for the highest percentage of complications in both cohorts (46.6% vs 41.8%, p = 0.686). There were no statistically significant differences between mean in-room OR time (187.5 ± 141.7 minutes vs 197.1 ± 153.0 minutes, p = 0.373) or mean open-to-close time (112.2 ± 107.9 minutes vs 121.0 ± 123.1 minutes, p = 0.300) between nonoverlapping and overlapping cases. CONCLUSIONS: There was no increased risk of 1-year complications or increased OR time for overlapping functional and stereotactic neurosurgical procedures compared with nonoverlapping procedures.
Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Reoperation/adverse effects , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a predominantly Black population undergoing standard treatment for lupus nephritis (LN) to estimate the incidence of, and risk factors for, complete response (CR) according to modified Aspreva Lupus Management Study (mALMS) and modified Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (mBLISS) criteria by 12 months. METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven LN class III or IV ± V, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≥1gm/gm and estimated glomerular filtration rate of >50 ml/minute/1.73 m2 at the time of the incident LN flare were included. The clinical, treatment, and laboratory factors associated with CR were identified using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 173 patients, 86.1% were women, 77.5% were Black, and over half (59.5%) had non-commercial insurance. By 12 months, 20.6% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14.6-28.6%) achieved mALMS CR and 33.7% (95% CI 26.4-42.4%) achieved mBLISS CR. Factors associated with mBLISS CR were commercial insurance (adjusted CR ratio = 3.5 [95% CI 1.9-6.7]; P < 0.001), albumin (adjusted CR ratio = 1.8 per 1 gm/dl increase in albumin; P = 0.02), and low C4 (adjusted CR ratio = 2.6; P = 0.03). Cumulative incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) at 3 years was 23.1% (95% CI 15.7-31.3%) and 6.1% (95% CI 2.8-11.1%) for death. Patients with non-commercial insurance were more likely to develop ESRD, with cumulative incidence of 30.4% (95% CI 19.6-41.9%) compared to 12.7% (95% CI 5.0-24.2%) for patients with commercial insurance (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: In a primarily Black, uninsured LN population, despite achieving similar CR rates at 12 months, the incidence of ESRD and death exceeded those observed in controlled clinical trials with placebo arms.
Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Lupus Nephritis , Humans , Female , Male , Lupus Nephritis/complications , Retrospective Studies , Standard of Care , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Delivery of Health Care , Albumins/therapeutic use , KidneyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Belatacept improves long-term graft survival, but control of some primary viral infections may be impaired. We evaluated the impact of belatacept and tacrolimus on cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral control, remission and relapse in CMV high-risk and moderate-risk recipients. METHODS: Using a multistate Markov model, we evaluated viral load state transitions of 173 kidney transplant recipients with at least one episode of viremia within 1 year after transplant: state 1, undetectable/low viral load; state 2, moderate viremia; and state 3, severe viremia. RESULTS: Among high-risk recipients, belatacept-treated recipients exhibited a significantly higher probability of entering moderate viremia (.36; 95% CI = .31, .41) than tacrolimus-treated recipients (.20; 95% CI = .13, .29). The expected number of days in viremic states differed. High-risk belatacept-treated recipients persisted in moderate viremia for significantly longer (128 days, 95% CI = 110, 146) than did tacrolimus-treated recipients (70.0 days, 95% CI = 45.2, 100) and showed a trend of shorter duration in low/undetectable viral load state (172 days, 95% CI = 148, 195) than did tacrolimus-treated recipients (239 days, 95% CI = 195, 277). Moderate-risk recipients showed better viral load control and with no differences by immunosuppression. CONCLUSION: High-risk belatacept-treated recipients showed defects in sustaining viral control relative to tacrolimus-treated recipients. Avoidance of initial use belatacept in high-risk recipients or development of modified management protocols should be considered.
Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Cytomegalovirus , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Abatacept/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Viremia/drug therapy , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Viral Load , Chronic Disease , Recurrence , Transplant Recipients , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at increased risk for severe disease including hospitalization, intensive care admission, ventilatory support, and death. Although pregnant patients were excluded from investigational trials for pharmacologic treatments for COVID-19 illness, the National Institutes of Health treatment guidelines state that efficacious treatments should not be withheld from pregnant patients. An infusion of casirivimab and imdevimab (REGEN-COV), a monoclonal antibody therapy, was shown to reduce the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization or death from any cause and resolved symptoms and reduced SARS-CoV-2 viral load more rapidly than placebo. In July of 2021, the Food and Drug Administration released an Emergency Use Authorization for REGEN-COV. Although pregnant persons were not included in the original trials, given the higher risk of morbidity and mortality in the pregnant population, our institution offered REGEN-COV to our pregnant patients beginning in August of 2021. Side effects after REGEN-COV administration are rare and thought to be secondary to COVID-19 rather than REGEN-COV. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to track safety and clinical outcomes in unvaccinated pregnant patients who received REGEN-COV and to compare these outcomes with those of a contemporary cohort of patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were eligible but did not receive REGEN-COV. Our hypothesis was that REGEN-COV administration during pregnancy is safe, and that pregnant persons who received REGEN-COV would experience less severe COVID-19 respiratory illness, with decreased length of hospital stay, rates of intensive care unit admission, and need for oxygen and other COVID-19 therapeutics. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients who either tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had a known exposure to a COVID-19-positive person, and were therefore eligible for REGEN-COV at our institution. Within this cohort, we compared those who received REGEN-COV with those who did not between March and October of 2021 at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. The main outcomes studied were perinatal outcomes, safety data, and the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: From March to October of 2021, 86 pregnant people tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction or had a confirmed exposure. In this group, 36 received REGEN-COV and 50 did not. There were no instances of infusion rate adjustment or discontinuation, anaphylaxis, or death among individuals who received REGEN-COV. One individual experienced worsening shortness of breath >24 hours after administration, which was classified as an infusion-related reaction. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcomes, length of hospitalization, rates of intensive care unit admission, additional pharmacologic treatment for COVID-19, or oxygen requirement between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Administration of REGEN-COV is safe in pregnancy and did not increase adverse maternal, neonatal, or obstetrical outcomes. There was not a statistically significant difference in COVID-19-related outcomes in our high-risk population. Given the likely safety of this drug in pregnancy and its known benefits in the nonpregnant population, we advocate for the continued use of this therapy and encourage the development of future studies to enroll a larger and more diverse cohort to explore its efficacy further.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antibodies, Neutralizing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Oxygen , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Objectives: The purpose is to report preliminary data on clinical response to dehydrated cell and protein concentrate (dCPC) versus corticosteroid (CSI). Design: A single-site prospective, randomized controlled single-blinded trial of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Pain and function were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Emory Quality of Life (EQOL) measure at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Results: 51 patients were enrolled at the time of analysis (27 dCPC, 24 CSI). Both groups demonstrated improvement on the VAS, KOOS and EQOL. Largest differences were observed at 2 (p = 0.05), 3 (p = 0.012) and 6 months (p < 0.001) with a decrease of 1.66 in VAS at 6 months for dCPC (95% CI: -2.67 to -0.65) and 1.34 (95% CI: -2.37 to -0.3) for CSI. Time-averaged measures showed no difference between groups (p = 0.20). Limited data at 9 and 12 months trended toward improvement in the dCPC group. Conclusion: dCPC products may be used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Larger trials are warranted. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03710005 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
The purpose of this study was to discuss preliminary data from a clinical trial comparing a single injection of an amniotic-derived tissue product (dehydrated cell and protein concentrate [dCPC]) to corticosteroid for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The study took place at a single institution. 51 patients were enrolled at the time of analysis (27 dCPC, 24 corticosteroid). Both groups demonstrated improvement in pain and function 6 months after treatment. There was a larger improvement in the amniotic-derived tissue product group, but this did not reach a level of statistical significance. There were limited data beyond 6 months, but this trended toward a continued improvement in the amniotic-derived tissue product group. Findings suggest that these amniotic derived tissue products may be used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but larger studies are needed.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a traditional barbotage technique with percutaneous ultrasonic barbotage (PUB) for the treatment of rotator cuff (RC) calcific tendinopathy. DESIGN: Three-year retrospective review. SETTING: Participants aged 18 to 75 presenting at 2 highly specialized outpatient orthopedic referral centers with symptomatic RC calcific tendinopathy. PATIENTS: There were 75 patients included (23 patients in the traditional barbotage group; 52 patients in the PUB group) with an average age of 55.3(6.5) and 55.9(9.8), respectively. There was no significant difference in demographics between groups. INTERVENTIONS: Traditional barbotage or PUB. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was pain rated on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with secondary outcomes investigating patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The barbotage and PUB group demonstrated a significant improvement in pain (barbotage 2.4, P = 0.01; PUB = 2.6, P < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between the 2 treatment modalities (95% CI: -1.8 to 2.2; P = 0.83, P = 0.83). Median follow-up for NPRS recordings was 17-weeks in the barbotage group and 8-weeks in the PUB group ( P = 0.004). Both groups demonstrated similar patient-reported satisfaction, without major complications. CONCLUSION: The traditional barbotage and PUB procedures improved pain with a high patient satisfaction rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.