Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies.

A well-validated and holistic program that incorporates robust gowning, cleaning, environmental monitoring, and personnel monitoring measures is critical for minimizing the microbial bioburden in cellular therapy manufacturing suites and the corresponding testing laboratories to ensure that the facilities are operating in a state of control. Ensuring product safety via quality control measures, such as sterility testing, is a regulatory requirement for both minimally manipulated (section 361) and more than minimally manipulated (section 351) human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps). In this video, we provide a stepwise guide for how to develop and incorporate the best aseptic practices for operating in a cleanroom environment, including gowning, cleaning, staging of materials, environmental monitoring, process monitoring, and product sterility testing using direct inoculation, provided by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP<71>) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Alternative Sterility Testing Method. This protocol is intended as a reference guide for establishments expected to meet current good tissue practices (cGTP) and current good manufacturing practices (cGMP).

Comparison of Five Commercial Molecular Assays for Mycoplasma Testing of Cellular Therapy Products.

Testing of cellular therapy products for Mycoplasma is a regulatory requirement by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ensure the sterility and safety of the product prior to release for patient infusion. The risk of Mycoplasma contamination in cell culture is high. Gold standard testing follows USP 63 which requires a 28-day agar and broth cultivation method that is impractical for short shelf-life biologics. Several commercial molecular platforms have been marketed for faster raw material and product release testing; however, little performance data are available in the literature. In this study, we performed a proof-of-principle analysis to evaluate the performance of five commercial molecular assays, including the MycoSEQ Mycoplasma detection kit (Life Technologies), the MycoTOOL Mycoplasma real-time detection kit (Roche), the VenorGEM qOneStep kit (Minerva Biolabs), the ATCC universal Mycoplasma detection kit, and the Biofire Mycoplasma assay (bioMérieux Industry) using 10 cultured Mollicutes spp., with each at four log-fold dilutions (1,000 CFU/mL to 1 CFU/mL) in biological duplicates with three replicates per condition (n = 6) to assess limit of detection (LOD) and repeatability. Additional testing was performed in the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Based on LOD alone, the Biofire Mycoplasma assay was most sensitive followed by the MycoSEQ and MycoTOOL which were comparable. We showed that not all assays were capable of meeting the ≤10 CFU/mL LOD to replace culture-based methods according to European and Japanese pharmacopeia standards. No assay interference was observed when testing in the presence of TILs.