Core trainee boot camp, a method for improving technical and non-technical skills of novice surgical trainees. A before and after study.

INTRODUCTION: The transition to surgical training can be a stressful time for trainees and is most evident during national handover periods where new graduates start and senior trainees rotate to new programmes. During this time, patient mortality can increase and Hospital efficiency reduces. This influence is compounded by the impact of working time directives. Intensive, simulation rich training programmes or "Boot Camps" have been postulated as a solution. This article highlights the development of a surgical boot camp for novice surgical trainees and the impact this can have on training. METHOD: A novel surgical boot camp was developed for all trainees within a surgical training region including nine acute NHS trusts. Participating cohort of trainees completed pre and post course questionnaires to assess technical and non-technical skills. RESULTS: 25 trainees attended and completed the pre and post boot camp questionnaire. Significant improvements were seen with technical skills (p = 0.0429), overall non-technical skills (p < 0.001) including leadership (p = 0.022), communication (p = 0.010), situational awareness (p = 0.022), patient handover (p = 0.003), ward round skills (p = 0.005) and outpatient skill (p = 0.002). Trainees reported significantly increased ability to assess and manage a critically unwell patient (p = 0.001) and a trauma patient (p = 0.001). 96% of trainees have utilised the skills they learnt on Boot Camp and all trainees would recommend it as an induction programme. CONCLUSION: Surgical Boot Camps offer a timely chance to develop technical and non-technical skills whilst enhancing a trainee's confidence and knowledge and reduce the patient safety impact of the handover period.

A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.

We compared the medium-term clinical and radiological results of hybrid total hip replacement (THR) with metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) in two groups of 54 young patients matched for age, gender, body mass index and pre-operative levels of activity. The clinical outcome was assessed by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EuroQol scores. Radiologically, all hips were assessed for migration and osteolysis, the hybrid THRs for polyethylene wear and the BHRs for a pedestal sign. The mean follow-up of the patients with a hybrid THR was ten years and for those with a BHR, nine years. Four patients with a hybrid THR and one with a BHR had died. In each group five were lost to follow-up. The revision rate of the hybrid THRs was 16.7% (9 of 54) and of the BHRs 9.3% (5 of 54) (p = 0.195). Radiographs of a further eight hybrid THRs demonstrated wear and osteolysis, and they await revision (p = 0.008). Of the unrevised BHRs 90% had radiological changes, of which approximately 50% had progressed over the previous four years. All hybrid THRs demonstrated linear polyethylene wear with a mean of 1.24 mm (0.06 to 3.03). The BHRs recorded superior OHS (p = 0.013), UCLA (p = 0.008), and EuroQol visual analogue scores (p = 0.009). After nine years, patients with BHRs remained more active and had a lower rate of revision than those with hybrid THRs. Both groups demonstrated progressive radiological changes at medium-term follow-up.

Quantification of fracture healing from radiographs using the maximum callus index.

UNLABELLED: Callus formation and growth are an essential part of secondary fracture healing. Callus growth can be observed radiographically and measured using the "Callus Index," which is defined as the maximum diameter of the callus divided by the diameter of the bone. We compared three groups of patients with tibial fractures treated by external fixation, intramedullary nailing, and casting to assess the validity of using serial measurements of callus index as a measure of fracture healing. When callus index was plotted against time for each patient, the point at which the fracture began to remodel, indicated by the highest point of the curve, was observed as a consistent feature regardless of fixation method. This occurred on average at 2(1/2) weeks after plaster cast removal (14 weeks post injury), 5 weeks after external fixator removal (22 weeks post injury), and 27 weeks post injury for the intramedullary nailed fractures. Because remodeling only occurs once the fracture is stable, a peak in callus index is a reliable sign that the fracture has united. Serial measurements of callus index would therefore appear to offer a simple method of quantifying secondary fracture healing regardless of the treatment method used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The use of LISS femoral locking plates and cabling in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around stable proximal femoral implants in elderly patients.

A retrospective review was performed of Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures treated using the Less Invasive Stabilisation System (LISS) femoral locking plate system. Five patients with stable hip prostheses (only one of which was an uncomplicated primary arthroplasty) were treated with the LISS plating system in combination with bone grafting and cables. The average age at the time of fixation was 87 years (range 83-93). All fractures united and all but one of the patients was able to mobilise independently. One case was complicated by superficial wound infection, but there were no other significant complications. One patient is still alive 50 months after surgery; the remaining four died a mean of 27 months postoperatively. Our results indicate that the LISS system is effective in the management of Type C periprosthetic fractures around well-fixed proximal femoral implants in the elderly, even in complex cases.

Weight bearing after tibial fracture as a guide to healing.

BACKGROUND: Judging when it is safe to remove an external fixator or plaster cast requires clinical and radiological assessment, both of which are subjective. Weight bearing has been shown to increase with time post-fracture and we hypothesised that it could be used as an objective measure of fracture healing. METHODS: Ground reaction force (and hence weight bearing) and fracture stiffness were measured serially in a group of 12 patients with tibial fractures treated by external fixation. Ground reaction force was measured for both fractured and non-fractured limbs using a force plate and the fracture stiffness was measured using the Orthometer, a commercially produced device for measuring the stiffness of fractures treated by external fixation. FINDINGS: In 10 patients who made good recoveries, prior to fixator removal, weight bearing though the injured leg was seen to approach 90% of that through the uninjured leg and the fracture stiffness exceeded 15 Nm/deg. Two patients with delayed union achieved weight bearing of 40% of normal and a fracture stiffness of less than 5 Nm/deg at 20 weeks. INTERPRETATION: Weight bearing correlates reasonably well with fracture stiffness. It is quicker and easier to measure than fracture stiffness and potentially has relevance to other fracture fixation methods.

Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.

We compared the five- to seven-year clinical and radiological results of the metal-on-metal Birmingham hip resurfacing with a hybrid total hip arthroplasty in two groups of 54 hips, matched for gender, age, body mass index and activity level. Function was excellent in both groups, as measured by the Oxford hip score, but the Birmingham hip resurfacings had higher University of California at Los Angeles activity scores and better EuroQol quality of life scores. The total hip arthroplasties had a revision or intention-to-revise rate of 8%, and the Birmingham hip resurfacings of 6%. Both groups demonstrated impending failure on surrogate end-points. Of the total hip arthroplasties, 12% had polyethylene wear and osteolysis under observation, and 8% of Birmingham hip resurfacings showed migration of the femoral component. Polyethylene wear was present in 48% of the hybrid hips without osteolysis. Of the femoral components in the Birmingham hip resurfacing group which had not migrated, 66% had radiological changes of unknown significance.

The practical limitations of resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

Resurfacing hip arthroplasty has recently experienced a resurgence in popularity, associated with an unprecedented amount of coverage in the media. This article assesses what proportion of a consecutive series of young adults presenting for total hip arthroplasty would have been suitable for resurfacing arthroplasty. Retrospective review of the preoperative radiographs was performed, with templating for the resurfacing prostheses. The hips were divided into those appropriate and those inappropriate for the procedure, and those in whom the procedure would be technically challenging. Sixty-one hips in 57 patients were reviewed, with ages ranging from 17 to 49 years. Twenty-eight hips were assessed as suitable, 26 as unsuitable, and 7 as technically challenging. Reasons for unsuitability included collapse and/or cystic degeneration of the femoral head.

Fracture stiffness measurement using the orthometer: reproducibility and sources of error.

OBJECTIVES: To elicit the reproducibility and the common sources of error in the use of the Orthometer, a commercially available goniometer based system, designed to measure the stiffness of healing fractures. DESIGN: A laboratory based study. BACKGROUND: The Orthometer is widely used to measure the progress of fracture healing in a quantitative manner. It has been shown previously that the bending stiffness of a fracture increases with healing and that a stiffness of 15 Nm/degree equates with the functional union of a tibial fracture. METHODS: The Orthometer was attached in a standard manner to nylon bars of known stiffness to determine the accuracy of the device. The Orthometer was then set up with changes in a single positional variable to assess the effect of this variable on the measurement accuracy. A number of different clinicians were asked to use the Orthometer before and after a simple training session and any improvements in the measurement accuracy were observed. RESULTS: Stiffness could be measured to within 10% or less of the true stiffness. Markedly different degrees of error were introduced with the various set-up variables. A simple training session improved clinician accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Orthometer does allow some degree of safety margin, it is essential that set-up is performed carefully, and that the clinician has been trained in the use of the device. RELEVANCE: Quantitative measurements of fracture healing have enormous potential benefits over manual and radiological methods of assessments. Provided these are carefully performed, the accuracy of these measurements is good.