Corrosion Generation and Cleaning Effect on Surgical Instruments with Attached Radiofrequency Identification Tags in Long-Term Usage.

Background: Faulty cleaning of surgical instruments may lead to corrosion damage and a higher risk of surgical site infection. We have developed a method in which each instrument has an attached radiofrequency identification (RFID) tag for individual management. However, because of the structure of the instruments, a risk of corrosion from poor cleaning exists; therefore, observation during long-term usage is necessary. Methods: The cleaning effect at the jig of the RFID tag was verified by the amount of residual protein left by various cleaning methods. In our investigation of long-term usage, we examined 94 surgical instruments with RFID tags used in the operating room for 50 months employing a microscope to identify any corrosion at the jig. Results: The method using a washer disinfector (WD) was found to be highly effective. From observation after long-term usage, friction by the RFID tag occurred in about 70% of the jigs. However, no pitting or general corrosion was seen. Conclusions: When WD is used properly, there is only a minor risk of residual protein, and corrosion does not occur even with long-term use. By using surgical instruments with RFID tags, it is possible to determine the number of uses and the history at the individual level. This facilitates operation of safe surgical instruments by limiting the number of times a particular instrument is used.

Evaluation of Surgical Instruments With Radiofrequency Identification Tags in the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: Surgical instrument retention and instrument breakage compromise surgery quality and lead to medical malpractice. We developed an instrument tracking system that could alert surgeons to instrument retention during surgery and monitor instrument use to reduce the risk of breakage. METHODS: This prospective, experimental clinical trial included 15 patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery or lumpectomy under general anesthesia at Saiseikai Kurihashi Hospital. Radiofrequency identification (RFID)-tagged surgical instruments were used, and a detection antenna was placed on a mayo stand during the operation. We analyzed the 1-loop detection ratio (OLDR)-that is, the capability of the antenna to detect devices in a single reading-and the total detection rate (TDR)-that is, the data accumulated for the duration of the operation-of the RFID-tagged instruments. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed that the OLDR was 95% accurate, whereas the TDR was 100% accurate. The antenna could not detect the RFID tag when there was interference from electrocautery noise radiation, and 6% of instrument movement was undetected by the antenna; however, the TDR and instrument use were detected at all times. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical instruments can be tracked during surgery, and this tracking can clarify the usage rate of each instrument and serve as a backup method of instrument counting. However, this study was conducted on a small scale, and RFID tags cannot be attached to small surgical instruments used in complex operations such as neurosurgery. Further efforts to develop a tracking system for these instruments are warranted.