ABSTRACT
We conducted a large-scale study of human perceptual quality judgments of High Dynamic Range (HDR) and Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) videos subjected to scaling and compression levels and viewed on three different display devices. While conventional expectations are that HDR quality is better than SDR quality, we have found subject preference of HDR versus SDR depends heavily on the display device, as well as on resolution scaling and bitrate. To study this question, we collected more than 23,000 quality ratings from 67 volunteers who watched 356 videos on OLED, QLED, and LCD televisions, and among many other findings, observed that HDR videos were often rated as lower quality than SDR videos at lower bitrates, particularly when viewed on LCD and QLED displays. Since it is of interest to be able to measure the quality of videos under these scenarios, e.g. to inform decisions regarding scaling, compression, and SDR vs HDR, we tested several well-known full-reference and no-reference video quality models on the new database. Towards advancing progress on this problem, we also developed a novel no-reference model called HDRPatchMAX, that uses a contrast-based analysis of classical and bit-depth features to predict quality more accurately than existing metrics.
ABSTRACT
As compared to standard dynamic range (SDR) videos, high dynamic range (HDR) content is able to represent and display much wider and more accurate ranges of brightness and color, leading to more engaging and enjoyable visual experiences. HDR also implies increases in data volume, further challenging existing limits on bandwidth consumption and on the quality of delivered content. Perceptual quality models are used to monitor and control the compression of streamed SDR content. A similar strategy should be useful for HDR content, yet there has been limited work on building HDR video quality assessment (VQA) algorithms. One reason for this is a scarcity of high-quality HDR VQA databases representative of contemporary HDR standards. Towards filling this gap, we created the first publicly available HDR VQA database dedicated to HDR10 videos, called the Laboratory for Image and Video Engineering (LIVE) HDR Database. It comprises 310 videos from 31 distinct source sequences processed by ten different compression and resolution combinations, simulating bitrate ladders used by the streaming industry. We used this data to conduct a subjective quality study, gathering more than 20,000 human quality judgments under two different illumination conditions. To demonstrate the usefulness of this new psychometric data resource, we also designed a new framework for creating HDR quality sensitive features, using a nonlinear transform to emphasize distortions occurring in spatial portions of videos that are enhanced by HDR, e.g., having darker blacks and brighter whites. We apply this new method, which we call HDRMAX, to modify the widely-deployed Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF) model. We show that VMAF+HDRMAX provides significantly elevated performance on both HDR and SDR videos, exceeding prior state-of-the-art model performance. The database is now accessible at: https://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/LIVEHDR/LIVEHDR_index.html. The model will be made available at a later date at: https://live.ece.utexas.edu//research/Quality/index_algorithms.htm.
ABSTRACT
Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. Up to 50% of non-palpable breast cancers are detected solely through microcalcification clusters in mammograms. This article presents a novel and completely automated algorithm for the detection of microcalcification clusters in a mammogram. A multiscale 2D non-linear energy operator is proposed for enhancing the contrast between the microcalcifications and the background. Several texture, shape, intensity, and histogram of oriented gradients (HOG)-based features are used to distinguish microcalcifications from other brighter mammogram regions. A new majority class data reduction technique based on data distribution is proposed to counter data imbalance problem. The algorithm is able to achieve 100% sensitivity with 2.59, 1.78, and 0.68 average false positives per image on Digital Database for Screening Mammography (scanned film), INbreast (direct radiography) database, and PGIMER-IITKGP mammogram (direct radiography) database, respectively. Thus, it might be used as a second reader as well as a screening tool to reduce the burden on radiologists.
