Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 34(5): 723-32, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24792479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing popularity of the combined augmentation mastopexy procedure among patients, the safety and efficacy of this surgery have been questioned by many surgeons. OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the safety and efficacy of the combined augmentation mastopexy procedure. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 615 consecutive patients who underwent combined augmentation mastopexy procedures at a single outpatient surgery center from 1992 through 2011. Patient demographics, operative and implant details, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Rates of complications and revisions were calculated. RESULTS: The most common complications were poor scarring (5.7%), wound-healing problems (2.9%), and deflation of saline implants (2.4%). Of the 615 patients evaluated, 104 (16.9%) elected to undergo revision surgery: 54 revision procedures were secondary to implant-related complications, and 50 were secondary to tissue-related complications. Our data compare favorably with previously reported revision rates for breast augmentation alone and mastopexy alone. CONCLUSIONS: With a skilled surgeon and proper patient selection, the combined augmentation mastopexy procedure can be safe and effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Breast Implantation/instrumentation , Breast Implants , California , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Photography , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...