Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
2.
J Clin Neurophysiol ; 41(1): 1, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181381
3.
J Clin Neurophysiol ; 41(1): 36-49, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38181386

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Presurgical evaluations to plan intracranial EEG implantations or surgical therapies at most epilepsy centers in the United States currently depend on the visual inspection of EEG traces. Such analysis is inadequate and does not exploit all the localizing information contained in scalp EEG. Various types of EEG source modeling or imaging can provide sublobar localization of spike and seizure sources in the brain, and the software to do this with typical long-term monitoring EEG data are available to all epilepsy centers. This article reviews the fundamentals of EEG voltage fields that are used in EEG source imaging, the strengths and weakness of dipole and current density source models, the clinical situations where EEG source imaging is most useful, and the particular strengths of EEG source imaging for various cortical areas where spike/seizure sources are likely.


Subject(s)
Brain , Epilepsy , Humans , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/surgery , Electrocorticography , Electroencephalography , Seizures/diagnostic imaging , Seizures/surgery , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/surgery
4.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 24(2): 35-46, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148387

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a functional neuroimaging technique that records neurophysiology data with millisecond temporal resolution and localizes it with subcentimeter accuracy. Its capability to provide high resolution in both of these domains makes it a powerful tool both in basic neuroscience as well as clinical applications. In neurology, it has proven useful in its ability to record and localize epileptiform activity. Epilepsy workup typically begins with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), but in many situations, EEG-based localization of the epileptogenic zone is inadequate. The complementary sensitivity of MEG can be crucial in such cases, and MEG has been adopted at many centers as an important resource in building a surgical hypothesis. In this paper, we review recent work evaluating the extent of MEG influence of presurgical evaluations, novel analyses of MEG data employed in surgical workup, and new MEG instrumentation that will likely affect the field of clinical MEG. RECENT FINDINGS: MEG consistently contributes to presurgical evaluation and these contributions often change the plan for epilepsy surgery. Extensive work has been done to develop new analytic methods for localizing the source of epileptiform activity with MEG. Systems using optically pumped magnetometry (OPM) have been successfully deployed to record and localize epileptiform activity. MEG remains an important noninvasive tool for epilepsy presurgical evaluation. Continued improvements in analytic methodology will likely increase the diagnostic yield of the test. Novel instrumentation with OPM may contribute to this as well, and may increase accessibility of MEG by decreasing cost.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Magnetoencephalography , Humans , Magnetoencephalography/methods , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/surgery , Electroencephalography/methods , Neuroimaging , Functional Neuroimaging
5.
Epilepsia ; 63(10): 2476-2490, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35811476

ABSTRACT

With continued advancement in computational technologies, the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) has shifted from pure visual analysis to a noninvasive computational technique called EEG source imaging (ESI), which involves mathematical modeling of dipolar and distributed sources of a given scalp EEG pattern. ESI is a noninvasive phase I test for presurgical localization of the seizure onset zone in focal epilepsy. It is a relatively inexpensive modality, as it leverages scalp EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data already collected typically during presurgical evaluation. With an adequate number of electrodes and combined with patient-specific MRI-based head models, ESI has proven to be a valuable and accurate clinical diagnostic tool for localizing the epileptogenic zone. Despite its advantages, however, ESI is routinely used at only a minority of epilepsy centers. This paper reviews the current evidence and practical fundamentals for using ESI of interictal and ictal epileptic activity during the presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant patients. We identify common errors in processing and interpreting ESI studies, describe the differences in approach needed for localizing interictal and ictal EEG discharges through practical examples, and describe best practices for optimizing the diagnostic information available from these studies.


Subject(s)
Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy , Electroencephalography/methods , Epilepsies, Partial/diagnostic imaging , Epilepsy/diagnostic imaging , Epilepsy/surgery , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Seizures/diagnosis
6.
Front Neurol ; 12: 722986, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34721261

ABSTRACT

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiologic test that offers a functional localization of epileptic sources in patients considered for epilepsy surgery. The understanding of clinical MEG concepts, and the interpretation of these clinical studies, are very involving processes that demand both clinical and procedural expertise. One of the major obstacles in acquiring necessary proficiency is the scarcity of fundamental clinical literature. To fill this knowledge gap, this review aims to explain the basic practical concepts of clinical MEG relevant to epilepsy with an emphasis on single equivalent dipole (sECD), which is one the most clinically validated and ubiquitously used source localization method, and illustrate and explain the regional topology and source dynamics relevant for clinical interpretation of MEG-EEG.

7.
J Clin Neurophysiol ; 35(6): 443-453, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30234690

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Most clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) centers record both MEG and EEG, but model only MEG sources. This may be related to the belief that MEG spikes are more prevalent, MEG is more sensitive, or to proprietary software limitations. Biophysics would contend, however, that EEG, being sensitive to radial and tangential source orientations, would provide complementary data for analysis. METHODS: We recorded 306 channels of MEG and 25 channels of EEG simultaneously in 297 consecutive patients over 3 years. We inspected the MEG and EEG recordings separately, identified spikes in both, determined whether their voltage and/or magnetometer magnetic fields were dipolar and thus model-worthy, and segregated them into types based on similar and distinct field topography. We placed for each patient their spike types into categories, including those with both a recognizable MEG and EEG signal and those with only an MEG and only an EEG signal. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of patients had spikes recorded, and these patients had an average of 2.7 spike types each. Fifty-six percent of spike types were present in both MEG and EEG. However, 36% of spike types were only evident in EEG, whereas 8% were noted in MEG alone. In 49% of patients with spikes, MEG review missed at least one spike type, whereas in 17% of patients, EEG review missed at least one spike type. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain an optimal yield of diagnostic information, EEG should also be subjected to source analysis in any clinical MEG study. EEG and MEG data are indeed complementary.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Magnetoencephalography , Adult , Biophysics , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Software , Young Adult
9.
Neurology ; 85(13): 1185-6, 2015 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26688873
11.
Neurology ; 84(7): 703-9, 2015 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25609764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between prone position and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis based on a literature search from databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, using keywords "SUDEP" or "sudden unexpected death in epilepsy" or "sudden unexplained death syndromes in epilepsy." Twenty-five publications met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Body positions were documented in 253 cases of SUDEP. Of these patients, 73.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.7%, 80.9%) died in the prone position, whereas 26.7% (95% CI = 16.3%, 37.1%) died in nonprone positions. Binary random-effects analysis showed that prone position is significantly associated with SUDEP, as compared with nonprone position (p < 0.001). In addition, the prone position was reported in all 11 cases of video-EEG-monitored SUDEP. Moreover, in a subgroup of 88 cases of SUDEP in which demographics and circumstances of death were documented, the prone position was observed in 85.7% (95% CI = 74.6%, 93.3%) of patients aged 40 years or younger, but in only 60% (95% CI = 38.7%, 78.9%) of patients older than 40 years. Statistical analysis confirmed that the prone position was significantly more prevalent in the younger patient group, as compared with the older patient group (odds ratio 3.9; 95% CI = 1.4%, 11.4%; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between prone position and SUDEP, which suggests that prone position is a major risk factor for SUDEP, particularly in patients aged 40 years and younger. As such, SUDEP may share mechanisms similar to sudden infant death syndrome.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden , Epilepsy/mortality , Prone Position , Humans , Risk Factors
13.
Epilepsia ; 54(5): 858-65, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23360300

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence, duration, risk factors for, and clinical correlates of postictal generalized electroencephalography (EEG) suppression (PGES), and to further delineate the significance of PGES in the pathogenesis of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the video-EEG studies of 109 consecutive patients with 151 generalized convulsive seizures (GCS) during video-EEG monitoring. We determined the incidence, duration, and clinical correlates of PGES. We also investigated whether factors such as age, sex, seizure type, total seizure duration, and duration of tonic and clonic phases influenced PGES. KEY FINDINGS: PGES was observed in 64 (58.7%) of 109 patients and in 98 (64.9%) of 151 GCS. Average duration of PGES was 42.4 ± 19.1 s. Statistical analysis showed that patients with PGES had no difference in age, gender, total seizure duration, total convulsive duration, clonic phase, seizure type, and seizure termination, as compared to those without PGES. However, tonic phase was significantly prolonged in patients with PGES than in those without PGES (p = 0.00086). A 1 s increase in tonic phase duration was associated with a 0.06 increase in log odds of PGES (odds ratio = 1.1, p = 0.00055). Clinically, 95.3% patients were unresponsive or immobile during PGES, whereas only 26.7% patients without PGES were unresponsive or immobile immediately after seizure termination. SIGNIFICANCE: PGES is a common EEG pattern of GCS. Tonic phase of GCS is an independent predictor of PGES, which is well correlated with postictal unresponsiveness or immobile, and may play a significant role in the mechanism of SUDEP.


Subject(s)
Brain Waves/physiology , Epilepsy, Generalized/diagnosis , Adult , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy, Generalized/epidemiology , Epilepsy, Generalized/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Video Recording , Young Adult
17.
Epilepsia ; 52(3): 467-76, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21204828

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several studies have suggested that interictal regional delta slowing (IRDS) carries a lateralizing and localizing value similar to interictal spikes and is associated with favorable surgical outcomes in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). However, whether IRDS reflects structural dysfunction or underlying epileptic activity remains controversial. The objective of this study is to determine the cortical electroencephalography (EEG) correlates of scalp-recorded IRDS, in so doing, to further understand its clinical and biologic significances. METHODS: We examined the cortical EEG substrates of IRDS with electrocorticography (ECoG-IRDS) and delineated the spatiotemporal relationship between ECoG-IRDS and both interictal and ictal discharges by recording simultaneously scalp and intracranial EEG in 18 presurgical candidates with TLE. KEY FINDINGS: Our results demonstrated that ECoG-IRDS is typically a mixture of delta/theta slowing and spike-wave potentials. ECoG-IRDS was predominantly recorded from basal and anterolateral temporal cortex, occasionally in mesial, posterior temporal, and extratemporal regions. Abundant IRDS was most commonly observed in patients with neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy (NTLE), whereas infrequent to moderate IRDS was usually observed in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). The anatomic distribution of ECoG-IRDS was highly correlated with the irritative and seizure-onset zones in 10 patients with NTLE. However, it was poorly correlated with the irritative and seizure-onset zones in the 8 patients with MTLE. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate that IRDS is an EEG marker of epileptic network in patients with TLE. Although IRDS and interictal/ictal discharges likely arise from the same neocortical generator in patients with NTLE, IRDS in patients with MTLE may reflect a network disease that involves temporal neocortex.


Subject(s)
Delta Rhythm , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/physiopathology , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Mapping , Dominance, Cerebral/physiology , Electrodes, Implanted , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/surgery , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic , Neocortex/physiopathology , Neocortex/surgery , Nerve Net/surgery , Preoperative Care , Temporal Lobe/physiopathology , Temporal Lobe/surgery , Young Adult
18.
Epilepsia ; 51(11): 2344-7, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21175606

ABSTRACT

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of mortality in patients with chronic uncontrolled epilepsy. Despite intense interest in SUDEP from the medical and scientific communities in recent years, its etiologies are still largely unresolved. A 35-year-old woman had SUDEP after having a generalized seizure in the prone position. The cause of her death was likely asphyxia from the convergence of postictal coma and suspected positional airway obstruction and hypoventilation, rather than the commonly suspected periictal cardiac arrhythmia or central apnea. SUDEP may share a similar etiology with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and is likely preventable, at least in a proportion of cases.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/diagnosis , Airway Obstruction/mortality , Coma/diagnosis , Coma/mortality , Death, Sudden/epidemiology , Death, Sudden/etiology , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic/mortality , Hypoventilation/diagnosis , Hypoventilation/mortality , Prone Position , Adult , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Asphyxia/etiology , Asphyxia/mortality , Cause of Death , Coma/etiology , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Hypoventilation/etiology , Risk Factors , Video Recording
19.
J Clin Neurophysiol ; 27(6): 360-71, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21076318

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the relative strengths and weaknesses of MEG and EEG source modeling for localization of epileptogenic foci. Proper interpretation of these dipole models requires an appreciation for the limitations of each technique and an understanding of the character of the cortical sources that can generate epileptiform transients identifiable in recordings of spontaneous cerebral activity. MEG is sensitive to smaller sources, is not altered by the skull and scalp, requires a simpler head model, and provides more accurate localization, but it is insensitive to radial sources. EEG requires larger sources, is attenuated and smeared by the skull/scalp, requires a more complicated head model, and provides less accurate localization; however, and most importantly, it is sensitive to all source orientations. In conclusion, the case is made that maximal clinical information is obtained when simultaneous MEG and EEG are both subjected to source modeling, either individually or in a combined fashion.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Magnetoencephalography , Animals , Brain/physiopathology , Brain Mapping , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Humans
20.
Clin EEG Neurosci ; 40(4): 281-7, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19780349

ABSTRACT

EEG interpretation by visual inspection of waveforms, using the assumption that activity at a given electrode is a representation of only the activity of the cortex immediately beneath it, has been the traditional form of EEG analysis since its inception. The relatively recent advent of digital EEG has allowed more advanced analysis of EEG data and has shown that the simple visual inspection described above is a simplistic form of analysis. This is especially true when one is attempting to localize an epileptogenic focus using EEG spikes or seizure onset data. Spatiotemporal analysis of scalp voltage fields has allowed for improved localization of likely cerebral origins of such waveforms. Equivalent dipole source modeling is one such technique and, although not perfect, provides improved characterization of spike and seizure sources as compared to previous methods when properly interpreted. The use of other modern techniques, such as 3D MRI reconstructions and realistic head models, can further improve accuracy of dipole localization and allow for the synthesis of EEG and imaging data, which may be invaluable, especially in cases of pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Brain/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/methods , Electroencephalography/methods , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Models, Neurological , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Animals , Computer Simulation , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...