Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/microbiology , Ehrlichia/isolation & purification , Ehrlichiosis/veterinary , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dogs , Ehrlichia/genetics , Ehrlichiosis/drug therapy , Ehrlichiosis/microbiology , Male , Minnesota , Phylogeny , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/chemistry , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/geneticsABSTRACT
Pain management is intimately linked to decision making. Nurses play a key role in making decisions regarding pain and its management. This paper presents data from a preliminary study (N = 53) extending the investigators' pain research into the areas of clinical decision making and ethical dilemmas related to pain management. Nurses completed surveys focused on actual experiences of caring for patients in pain. The results identify common clinical decisions related to pain, barriers to providing optimum pain relief, and ethical/professional conflicts in pain management. Decisions related to the amount of pain intensity, when to give medications, and choice of analgesics. Nurses identified verbal and nonverbal cues central to their decisions regarding pain assessment. Barriers to effective pain management included physician knowledge and cooperation, patient/family knowledge and cooperation, as well as nursing knowledge and time. Respondents identified ethical dilemmas about overmedication or undermedication, conflicts with physicians or patients, and concern over opioid side effects. A tentative model of decision making related to pain is presented.
