Triple-negative breast cancer on contrast-enhanced MRI and synthetic MRI: A comparison with non-triple-negative breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with non-TNBC on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and synthetic MRI. METHOD: This retrospective study included 79 patients with histopathologically proven breast cancer (TNBC: 16, non-TNBC: 63) who underwent synthetic MRI. Using synthetic MR images, we obtained T1 and T2 relaxation times in breast lesions before (Pre-T1, Pre-T2, Pre-PD) and after (Gd-T1, Gd-T2, Gd-PD) contrast agent injection. Subsequently, we calculated the ΔT1 (Pre-T1 - Gd-T1), ΔT2 (Pre-T2 - Gd-T2), Pre-T1/T2, and Gd-T1/T2. We compared the aforementioned quantitative values, as well as several morphologic features between TNBCs and non-TNBCs that were identified on DCE-MRI. RESULTS: The multivariate analyses revealed that the Pre-T2 (P = 0.037) and the presence of rim enhancement (P-RIM) (P = 0.034) were significant and independent predictors of TNBC. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for all breast cancers was greater when a combination of Pre-T2 and P-RIM (Pre-T2＋P-RIM; Method 3, AUC (area under the curve) = 0.858) was used to distinguish between TNBCs and non-TNBCs versus the use of either Pre-T2 alone (Method 1, AUC = 0.786) or P-RIM alone (Method 2, AUC = 0.747). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-T2 obtained using synthetic MRI and P-RIM identified on DCE-MRI allowed the differentiation between TNBCs and non-TNBCs. However, these results are preliminary and need to be verified by further studies.

Enhanced Masses on Contrast-Enhanced Breast: Differentiation Using a Combination of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Quantitative Evaluation with Synthetic MRI.

BACKGROUND: The addition of synthetic MRI might improve the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in patients with breast cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of a combination of DCE-MRI and quantitative evaluation using synthetic MRI for differentiation between benign and malignant breast masses. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, observational. POPULATION: In all, 121 patients with 131 breast masses who underwent DCE-MRI with additional synthetic MRI were enrolled. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0 Tesla, T1 -weighted DCE-MRI and synthetic MRI acquired by a multiple-dynamic, multiple-echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: All lesions were differentiated as benign or malignant using the following three diagnostic methods: DCE-MRI type based on the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System; synthetic MRI type using quantitative evaluation values calculated by synthetic MRI; and a combination of the DCE-MRI + Synthetic MRI types. The diagnostic performance of the three methods were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate (Mann-Whitney U-test) and multivariate (binomial logistic regression) analyses were performed, followed by receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the mean T1 relaxation time in a breast mass obtained by synthetic MRI prior to injection of contrast agent (pre-T1 ) was the only significant quantitative value acquired by synthetic MRI that could independently differentiate between malignant and benign breast masses. The AUC for all enrolled breast masses assessed by DCE-MRI + Synthetic MRI type (0.83) was significantly greater than that for the DCE-MRI type (0.70, P < 0.05) or synthetic MRI type (0.73, P < 0.05). The AUC for category 4 masses assessed by the DCE-MRI + Synthetic MRI type was significantly greater than that for those assessed by the DCE-MRI type (0.74 vs. 0.50, P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: A combination of synthetic MRI and DCE-MRI improves the accuracy of diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses, especially category 4 masses. Level of Evidence 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2021;53:381-391.