Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Serelaxin in Japanese Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Serelaxin, a recombinant form of human relaxin-2, is in development for treating acute heart failure (AHF) and a Phase II study in Japanese AHF patients was conducted. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of serelaxin at 10 and 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)continuous intravenous infusion for up to 48 h, added to standard care for Japanese AHF patients. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) through Day 5, serious AEs (SAEs) through Day 14, and serelaxin pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints included changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiorenal biomarkers. A total of 46 patients received the study drug and were followed for 60 days. The observed AE profile was comparable between the groups, with no AEs of concern. Dose-dependent increase in the serum concentration of serelaxin was observed across the 2 dose rates of serelaxin. A greater reduction in SBP was observed with serelaxin 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)vs. placebo (-7.7 [-16.4, 1.0] mmHg). A greater reduction in NT-proBNP was noted with serelaxin (-50.8% and -54.9% for 10 and 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1), respectively at Day 2). CONCLUSIONS: Serelaxin was well tolerated in this study with Japanese AHF patients, with no AEs of concern and favorable beneficial trends on efficacy. These findings support further evaluation of serelaxin 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)in this patient population.

Differential pharmacological effects of antimuscarinic drugs on heart rate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study with tolterodine and darifenacin in healthy participants > or = 50 years.

Antimuscarinics, used commonly to treat overactive bladder, may differ in their potential to increase heart rate via effects on cardiac muscarinic M2 receptors. This prospective, 3-way crossover, randomized, double-blind study assessed the heart rate effects of 7 days' exposure to a nonselective M2/M3 receptor blocker (tolterodine; 4 mg/d), a highly selective M3 receptor blocker (darifenacin; 15 mg/d), and placebo in 162 healthy participants > or = 50 years. Heart rate was measured by 24-hour Holter monitoring. Tolterodine significantly increased heart rate versus darifenacin and heart rate versus placebo, while darifenacin did not affect heart rate versus placebo. The proportion of participants with an increase in mean heart rate per 24 hours of > or =5 beats per minute was higher with tolterodine than with darifenacin (P = .0004) or with placebo (P = .0114) but did not differ between darifenacin and placebo. The results show that antimuscarinics exert differential effects on heart rate depending on their muscarinic receptor profile. This should be considered when selecting a treatment.

Long-term benefits of darifenacin treatment for patient quality of life: results from a 2-year extension study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Overactive bladder (OAB), a chronic condition requiring long-term management, is associated with substantial impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The short-term benefits of antimuscarinic drug treatment are well known. Here we investigate the impact on HRQoL of long-term treatment with the M(3)-selective muscarinic receptor antagonist darifenacin over 2 years. METHODS: HRQoL was assessed using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) for patients with 'wet' OAB treated with darifenacin (7.5/15 mg once daily [o.d.]) in an open-label 2-year extension of two double-blind feeder studies. Data were also analyzed for the subset of patients who continued darifenacin 7.5/15 mg o.d. directly into the extension study from the feeder studies (the 'darifenacin continuation' group), and also older patients (>or=65 years) and men within this group. RESULTS: The total study population comprised 716 patients, of whom 303 patients formed the 'darifenacin continuation' group (including 85 patients >or=65 years and 41 men). Substantial impairment of HRQoL was noted in baseline KHQ assessments. KHQ scores improved significantly from feeder-study baseline to extension study end/last visit in eight of the nine domains, with more than 50% of patients reporting improvements in seven of the nine domains. Despite fewer patients, significant improvements in KHQ scores were also observed in the subsets of older patients (>or=65 years) and men. Almost two-thirds of the 'darifenacin continuation' group were either satisfied or extremely satisfied with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term darifenacin treatment was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL for patients with 'wet' OAB over 2 years.

Differential effects of the antimuscarinic agents darifenacin and oxybutynin ER on memory in older subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of darifenacin controlled-release (CR) and oxybutynin extended-release (ER) on cognitive function (particularly memory) in older subjects. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n=150) >/=60 years were randomised to darifenacin, oxybutynin ER or placebo in a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 3-week study. Doses were administered according to US labels: oxybutynin ER 10mg once daily (od), increasing to 15mg od then 20mg od by week 3; darifenacin 7.5mg od in weeks 1 and 2, then 15mg od in week 3. The primary end point was accuracy on the Name-Face Association Test (delayed recall) at week 3. RESULTS: Results of the Name-Face Association Test at week 3 showed no significant difference between darifenacin and placebo on delayed recall (mean difference, -0.06, p=0.908). In contrast, oxybutynin ER resulted in memory impairment, with significantly lower scores than placebo and darifenacin (mean differences, -1.30, p=0.011 and -1.24, p=0.022, respectively) for delayed recall on the Name-Face Association Test at week 3. Additional tests of delayed recall indicated significant memory impairment with oxybutynin ER versus placebo at certain time points, whereas darifenacin was similar to placebo. No between-treatment differences were detected in self-rated memory, demonstrating that subjects were unaware of memory deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: While darifenacin had no significant effects on memory versus placebo, oxybutynin ER caused significant memory deterioration (magnitude of effect comparable to brain aging of 10 years). The results also demonstrate that subjects may not recognise/report memory deterioration.