Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 17(8): 1043-8, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23827028

ABSTRACT

SETTING: Gauteng, South Africa. OBJECTIVE: To determine treatment uptake among newly diagnosed multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients and risk markers for non-initiation of treatment. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted including all newly diagnosed MDR-TB patients in Gauteng Province, South Africa, in 2011. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of those who attended Sizwe Hospital, the designated MDR-TB hospital, were extracted from their medical records. District health offices provided data on patients not seen at Sizwe Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to determine risk markers for non-initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 942 newly diagnosed MDR-TB patients in Gauteng, only 593 (63%) initiated treatment. Of these, 70 (11.8%) did not maintain treatment up to the fourth month. Among the 349 (37%) who did not initiate treatment, 31.2% died and 46.4% could not be accounted for. Referral for laboratory diagnosis from hospitals, health district of the laboratory diagnosis, human immunodeficiency virus infection and place of residence were independently associated with non-initiation of MDR-TB treatment. CONCLUSION: Untreated patients continue to transmit MDR-TB in the community. These study findings highlight the need to identify and target the causes of non-initiation of treatment in specific settings.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Medication Adherence , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , South Africa/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/transmission , Young Adult
2.
SADJ ; 67(7): 364, 366-9, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23951794

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial properties of a slow release noncorrosive chlorine dioxide with those of sodium dichloroisocyanurate to establish their possible use in the dental settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disinfectant solutions were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions and tested against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Streptococcus mutans NCTC 1044, Candida albicans ATCC 90028, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 15244 spores, Mycobacterium tuberculosis ATCC 25177, Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium ATCC 25291 and Hepatitis B virus using the Standard quantitative suspension test. The shelf-lives of the disinfectants were also determined. RESULTS: Both disinfectants killed all the test organisms within 30 seconds. B. subtilis spores were killed in 2 and 2.5 minutes by chlorine dioxide and sodium dichloroisocya nurate respectively. When diluted solutions of these disinfectants were stored in screw cap bottles, they retained their activity for at least 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorine dioxide and sodium dichloroisocyanurate containing disinfectants can be used in the denta settings for surfaces and heat sensitive instruments. However, chlorine dioxide is advantageous because it is non-corrosive and the effective concentration is lower than that recommended for sodium dichloroisocyanurate.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Chlorine Compounds/pharmacology , Chlorine/pharmacology , Dental Disinfectants/pharmacology , Oxides/pharmacology , Triazines/pharmacology , Bacillus subtilis/drug effects , Candida albicans/drug effects , Hepatitis B virus/drug effects , Humans , Materials Testing , Mycobacterium avium/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...