Compartment Syndrome of the Gluteal Region: A Rare Condition Requiring a High Index of Suspicion.

Introduction: Compartment syndrome, an exceptionally rare condition, is a surgical emergency that can quickly escalate to limb ischemia and necrosis without treatment. Most cases occur post-trauma, typically affecting the anterior compartment of the leg. Patients present with pain out of proportion to their physical examination findings and often have an early hallmark discovery of pain with passive extension. Compartment syndrome of the buttock requires an even higher index of suspicion, as the condition is even more uncommon, and the diagnosis is complicated by it being difficult to palpate the affected area and passively extend the leg when the patient is supine. Case Report: This case report presents an 83-year-old female with compartment syndrome of the left gluteal region, status post-fall 1 day earlier. She was admitted to the medical team for observation and failed to respond to narcotic pain medication. The physical examination revealed firm, tense, left gluteal compartments with buttock hematoma and surrounding muscle induration, significant pain, and extremity weakness in the sciatic nerve distribution. An emergent fasciotomy was performed to decompress the affected compartments. Conclusion: All physicians must be mindful of gluteal compartment syndrome in patients complaining of buttock pain, especially after pelvic trauma, who present with buttock swelling, tense gluteal compartments, and severe gluteal pain. A delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to severe consequences, including disability, irreversible gluteal muscle damage, sciatic nerve dysfunction, kidney failure, or death.

Injections for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A narrative review of the literature.

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is an extremely common condition in the general population. Nonoperative treatment is a mainstay of management prior to surgical carpal tunnel release. Injections are frequently used as treatment, especially corticosteroid injections, but there is little consensus in the literature regarding injection number, volume, corticosteroid dose, and technique. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed of PubMed to identify papers relating to corticosteroid injections as well as other injections performed in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Results: A total of 45 articles were selected for inclusion in this review. Corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome are discussed in detail, including injection number, volume, and technique as well as corticosteroid dose. Alternative injections for management of carpal tunnel syndrome are also discussed. Conclusions: Corticosteroid injections have been identified as a safe, effective short term management option for carpal tunnel syndrome. However, there is no standardized recommendation for specifics of their use in relation to corticosteroid dose, number of injections, injectate volume, and use of ultrasound guidance. Further research is required to better establish the optimal role for corticosteroid injections in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Platelet rich plasma, lidocaine, and hyaluronic acid, among others, are additional injections that warrant further exploration for use in management of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Management of Syndesmosis Injury: A Narrative Review.

The syndesmosis is an important fibrous joint that plays a crucial role in normal ankle weight-bearing and movements. Syndesmosis injuries include disruption of one or more of the ligaments comprising the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and are commonly associated with ankle fractures. The treatment of grade 1 syndesmosis injury should be conservative, such as immobilization for one to three weeks followed by gradual return to activity. For the treatment of grade 2 syndesmosis injury, if it was stable enough, the patients still could be managed with conservative therapies. But majority of them strongly favor surgical treatment. For the treatment of grade 3 syndesmosis injury, it should treat with surgical reconstruction. If syndesmosis injury is associated with ankle fractures, surgical reduction, fixation, and reconstruction are usually required. Common surgical treatment methods include syndesmosis screws, composed of either metallic or bioabsorbable material; fibula intramedullary nails; and dynamic button-suture fixation, TightRope or ZipTight. Each method has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered while determining which treatment will provide the best outcomes depending on the patient's needs. Continued exploration of new materials, devices, and methods for surgical fixation is necessary for advancement in this field.

Surgical outcomes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty classified by Su et al. system.

Background: Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur remain a challenge to treat due to variations in both patient- and fracture-specific factors. This study was designed to analyze the outcomes of different subtypes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures based on the Su et al. classification system. Methods: Thirty-six patients were classified with Su et al. system. All Type I and II fractures were managed with a locking plate. Most Type III fractures were managed with locking plate, while two were managed with long-stem revision arthroplasty due to evidence of implant loosening. Outcomes were measured and analyzed based on healing time, revision rate, and complication rate. Results: Of the 36 patients, 30 (83.3%) achieved acceptable fracture union, while the remaining 6 (16.7%) experienced either delayed union or non-union. Type I fractures showed a significantly lower healing time than Type II and III fractures managed by locking plate. Delayed union was present in the Type II group, while non-union was recorded for two Type III fractures. Need for revision was more prevalent in fracture Types II and III. Conclusion: The Su et al. system of classification for periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur matches the clinical outcomes of this study and would seem to be useful in the approach to the treatment of these fractures. The majority of these fractures can be managed with locking plate with reasonable results. However, if the implant is loosened in Type III fractures, revision arthroplasty is suggested.

A systematic review of the surgical outcomes of interprosthetic femur fractures.

Background: Interprosthetic femur fractures (IFFs) are rare, but the treatment is challenging. Currently, there are many treatment methods used in practice, but an updated systematic review of comparison of common different surgical outcomes has not been thoroughly inspected. Methods: A systematic review of retrospective studies was conducted. The resource databases of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched using a combination of the keywords involving IFFs and surgical outcomes from inception through June 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes. Outcomes were measured based on healing time, revision rate, complication rate, and functional scores. Results: Forty studies were included for review with a total of 508 patients. Average reported age of patients was 78.7 years old and 403 (79.3%) were females. Overall union rate was 74.0% with 376 of 508 patients achieving fracture union after primary treatment of IFF. Only 271 patients had reported healing times of fractures with a mean of 5.15 months. The plate, prosthetic revision, nail/rod, and external fixator groups had mean healing times of 4.69, 8.73, 6.5, and 5.1 months, respectively. Revision rates were highest in the femur replacement treatment group with 9 (32.1%) patients needing at least one reoperation surgery for any reason. Overall, hardware failure and non-unions were the most reported complications in treatment of IFFs. Postoperative functional outcome scores were available for 242 patients. Harris Hip Scores for the plate, revision, replacement, nail/rod, and plate + revision groups were 76.84, 77.14, 69.9, 77, and 78.4, respectively. Conclusion: Each treatment method should be carefully considered by the surgeon depending on the patient. Locking plate was the most common method for the treatment of the patients with IFFs. Half of them combined with cerclage wires/cables. Around two thirds' patients could achieve union with the fastest mean healing time around 4.69 months. Other less common methods included prosthetic revision, femur replacement, nail/rod, external fixator, etc. A small number of patients treated with Ilizarov external fixator, and it has proven to be a viable option with few complications and high union rates.

Managements of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A narrative review.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are the most common fragility fracture and significantly influence the quality of life in the elderly. Currently, the literature lacks a comprehensive narrative review of the management of OVCFs. The purpose of this study is to review background information, diagnosis, and surgical and non-surgical management of the OVCFs. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Google Scholar for articles in the English language between 1980 and 2021 was performed. Combinations of the following terms were used: compression fractures, vertebral compression fractures, osteoporosis, osteoporotic compression fractures, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and osteoporosis treatments. Additional articles were also included by examining the reference list of articles found in the search. OVCFs, especially those that occur over long periods, can be asymptomatic. Symptoms of acute OVCFs include pain localized to the mid-line spine, a loss in height, and decreased mobility. The primary treatment regimens are pain control, medication management, vertebral augmentation, and anterior or posterior decompression and reconstructions. Pain control can be achieved with acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for mild pain or opioids and/or calcitonin for moderate to severe pain. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are the first-line treatments for osteoporosis. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients who have not found symptomatic relief through conservative methods and are effective in achieving pain relief. Vertebroplasty is less technical and cheaper than kyphoplasty but could have more complications. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation can have a protective and therapeutic effect. Management of OVCFs must be combined with multiple approaches. Appropriate exercises and activity modification are important in fracture prevention. Medication with different mechanisms of action is a critical long-term causal treatment strategy. The minimally invasive surgical interventions such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are reserved for patients not responsive to conservative therapy and are recognized as efficient stopgap treatment methods. Posterior decompression and fixation or Anterior decompression and reconstruction may be required if neurological deficits are present. The detailed pathogenesis and related targeted treatment options still need to be developed for better clinical outcomes.

Syndesmosis screw breakage: An analysis of multiple breakage locations.

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Concerns have been raised about screw breakage within the tibia or fibula, referred to as intraosseous breakage. The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the technical aspects of syndesmotic screw placement in multiple anatomic breakage locations. MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of over 1056 patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation was completed. Demographics, screw length, width, number, height above the tibial plafond, angle, breakage location, and breakage location on the screw were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Intraosseous (IO) screw breakage (91 screws, 68 patients) was more common than clear space (CS) breakage (28 screws, 18 patients) (P = < 0.001). Within the IO group, screw breakage within the tibia (60 screws, 52 patients) was more common compared to fibula breakage (29 screws, 24 patients) (P = < 0.001).Increased BMI and the use of multiple screws were associated with IO breakage (P = .007) and CS breakage (P = .012), respectively. Increased screw angle and age were associated with fibular IO breakage (P = .021, P = .036) when compared to other IO breakage locations. Screw angle and placement showed no significant differences between compared groups (P = .629, P = .570). CONCLUSION: Syndesmosis screw breakage, overall, occurred more commonly in an IO location. When compared to IO breakage, the use of multiple syndesmosis screws is most associated with CS breakage. Increased BMI is associated with increased IO breakage when compared to CS breakage. Patients with IO screw breakage within the fibula had increased age and placed at a higher angle when compared to other IO breakage locations. No other factors related to screw placement, including the height of placement, were found to be significantly associated with location of screw breakage.

Surgical outcomes of subtypes of periprosthetic tibia fractures after total knee arthroplasty.

Surgical outcomes of subtypes of periprosthetic tibia fractures after total knee arthroplasty were evaluated by using the Felix et al. classification system. Type 3 fractures were the most common classification of periprosthetic tibial fractures. Type 2 fractures had the highest rates of revision and nonunion. Type 3 fractures exhibited longer healing times than types 2 and 4. Far type 3 fractures showed the longest healing time of all fracture types but had very minimal complications. Type 4 fracture managed by K-wire/cerclage wire may require hardware removal or debridement but exhibited the shortest healing time compared to types 2 and 3.

Arthrodesis or Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study is to determine if arthrodesis, compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), produces favorable American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and to determine if differences in complication, revision surgery, and secondary arthrodesis rates exist for patients with Lisfranc fracture/dislocation injuries. Searches were performed in PubMed using the keywords "Lisfranc fracture," "metatarsal fracture," "ORIF," "open reduction internal fixation," "arthrodesis," and "fusion." These criteria left 183 articles for review. Exclusions left 21 articles and 2 translations of Chinese abstracts. Data analysis was performed using Student's 2-sample t test for samples of equal variance, and chi-square test for goodness of fit. The t test revealed a significant difference (P = .03) between the average AOFAS score for patients who underwent primary arthrodesis (84.7 ± 6.14) compared with those who were treated with ORIF (78.9 ± 5.09). There was no significant difference for the average VAS scores (P = .33) of the arthrodesis and ORIF groups. The complication rate of arthrodesis patients was significantly lower than ORIF patients (P = .04), and the rates of revision surgery (P = .22) and secondary arthrodesis (P = .53) were not significant between the groups. The results of this study indicate that arthrodesis may be a better surgical option than ORIF, due to the higher functional scores and the lower complication rate.Levels of Evidence: Level III: A meta-analysis.

Sacroiliitis: A Review on Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Introduction: Sacroiliitis is an inflammation of one or both of the sacroiliac (SI) joints, most often resulting pain in the lower back that can extend down the legs. Pain arising from the SI joint can be difficult to diagnose and treat due to the intricate surrounding ligamentous structure, nerve innervation, and its role in transferring weight from the upper body to the lower limbs. SI joint dysfunction accounts for up to 25% of cases of lower back pain and has a debilitating effect on patient functionality. This review aims to provide comprehensive coverage of all aspects of SI joint pain, with a specific focus on differential diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Current literature on SI joint pain and inflammation, other etiologies of lower back pain, and new treatment options were compiled using the databases PubMed and Cochrane and used to write this comprehensive review. There were no restrictions when conducting the literature search with regard to publication date, study language, or study type. Results: The diagnosis protocol of SI joint pain arising from sacroiliitis usually begins with the presentation of lower back pain and confirmatory diagnostic testing through fluoroscopy joint block. Reduction in pain following the anesthetic is considered the golden standard for diagnosis. The treatment begins with the conservative approach of physical therapy and analgesics for symptom relief. However, refractory cases often require interventional methods such as corticosteroid injections, prolotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, and even SI joint fusion surgery. Conclusion: SI joint pain is a complex problem that can present with varying patterns of pain due to uncertainty regarding its innervation and its prominent surrounding structure. It is therefore especially important to obtain a thorough history and physical on top of diagnostic tests such as a diagnostic block to properly identify the source of pain. Conservative treatment options with physical therapy and analgesics should be attempted first before interventional strategies such as ablation, injections, and prolotherapy can be considered. SI joint fusion surgery is a solution to cases in which previous methods do not provide significant relief.

Surgical outcomes of non-periprosthetic distal femur fragility fractures treated with a locking plate.

Background: Management of distal femur fractures can be challenging, particularly in the aged female population. This retrospective study aims to analyze the surgical outcomes of aged female patients with non-periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with a locking plate. Methods: This is an IRB approved retrospective review conducted at a level 1 trauma center. Fifty-five female patients (mean age of 71 years) with non-periprosthetic distal femur fractures underwent open reduction internal fixation using a locking plate from 2005 to 2019. The average follow-up time was 67 weeks from the date of injury. Criteria used for diagnosis of nonunion included one or more of the following: (I) three consecutive months without progression of healing on postoperative radiographs, (II) a total of nine months postoperative without complete healing, or (III) the physician diagnosed nonunion using clinical judgement. Outcome data was analyzed and compared amongst patients with and without obesity or diabetes. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Microsoft Excel 2022 Data Analysis ToolPak with a standard statistically significant P value of <0.05. Results: Thirty-two patients (58%) with distal femur fractures achieved union after initial treatment while 23 patients (42%) were diagnosed with nonunion. Fourteen patients (61%) underwent revision with 9 of these patients (64%) achieving union while 5 patients (36%) had persistent nonunion. Average healing time from initial treatment to union was 29 weeks, while average time from definitive treatment to union was 22 weeks. Obese patients [body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2] had a nonunion rate of 65%, while non-obese patients had a nonunion rate of 28%. Patients with diabetes had a nonunion rate of 65%, while patients without diabetes had a nonunion rate of 28%. Conclusions: Union can be successfully achieved in aged female patients with distal femur fractures treated with locking plates; however, the risks for nonunion and revision remain high. Patients with obesity and diabetes appear to be at an increased risk of nonunion (P=0.008 and 0.008, respectively). However, further research should be conducted with a prospective study or multivariate analysis and increased number of patients to reaffirm this data.

Interventions for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Comparison Studies.

Background Distal radius fractures are one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries. There are many effective treatment methods, such as volar plate, dorsal plate, percutaneous pins, external fixation, and casting; however, comparison of the treatment outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated. Our purpose is to determine if volar plating is the superior treatment method for distal radius fractures. We will address this through the following questions: First, is volar plating superior to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting in terms of reported complications? Second, does volar plating produce superior functional outcomes to dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Third, are the radiographic outcomes superior for volar plating when compared with dorsal plating, percutaneous pins, external fixation, or casting? Methods MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, and JSTOR databases, as well as manual search, were used to identify papers comparing complications and functional results of volar plating to other treatment methods for distal radius fractures published after the year 2000. Complication data and function scores were recorded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and data was analyzed for meta-analysis using Cochrane ReviewManager software. Results Compared with dorsal plate, volar plate performed significantly better in Gartland and Werley score. Volar plating outperformed percutaneous pins for loss of reduction, infection, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and ulnar deviation. Loss of reduction, malunion, Patient Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, DASH score, grip strength, ulnar deviation, and supination were significantly better for volar plating when compared with casting. When compared with external fixation, volar plating had significantly less cases of infection, lower QuickDASH score, and higher range of motion for flexion, pronation, and supination. All other complication and functional outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions Distal radius fractures treated with volar plating showed relatively better measures of complications, function scores, and range of motion than other treatment methods; however, there was no significant difference in healing time when compared with percutaneous pins. More studies are needed to compare the rest of the treatment methods with each other.

Biomechanical comparison of suture-button, bioabsorbable screw, and metal screw for ankle syndesmotic repair: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To compare biomechanically metal screw fixation to suture-button or bioabsorbable screw fixation for ankle syndesmotic injuries. METHODS: A literature search of the comparison studies in Pubmed and Google Scholar was conducted. The biomechanical outcomes of interest were syndesmotic stability in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes as well as torque and rotation at failure. RESULTS: A total of 11 cadaveric studies were included. In the suture-button group, coronal displacement (MD 1.72mm, p = 0.02) and sagittal displacement (MD 2.65mm, p = 0.0003) were increased relative to the metal screw group. In contrast, no difference was found with axial rotation (MD 0.35 degrees, p = 0.57). Bioabsorbable screws exhibited equivalent failure torque (MD -3.04Nm, p = 0.53) and rotation at failure (MD 3.77 degrees, p = 0.48) in comparison to metal screws. CONCLUSIONS: Suture-button provide less rigidity when compared to metal screw fixation. They afford flexible syndesmotic micromotion which may more closely resemble a physiological state and be helpful for ligament healing. Bioabsorbable screws demonstrate similar mechanical strength properties to metal screws.

Revision of Syndesmosis Screw Fixation.

Background: Many syndesmosis screw fixations do not achieve success at the first attempt. Currently, there are no data available to evaluate revision of syndesmosis screw failure. Methods: A total of 160 consecutive patients who underwent syndesmosis screw fixation from 2014 to 2016 were reviewed. The current study focuses on 13 of 160 patients who underwent revision surgery and analyzes reasons, methods, and outcomes of syndesmotic screw revisions. Results: Thirteen out of 160 patients had revision surgeries. Incidence of recurrent diastasis was 92.3%. Seven out of 19 screws had broken. Two patients had screw loosening, 9 patients underwent early weightbearing, 1 patient developed osteomyelitis, 1 patient developed osteoarthritis, and 1 patient had fibular nonunion. Eleven patients underwent removal, 3 patients underwent clamp reduction, and 4 patients underwent fibular osteotomy. Six patients experienced good reduction with 0/10 pain, 3 patients experienced good reduction with some pain, 1 patient experienced poor reduction; 1 patient developed osteomyelitis and subsequent 7/10 pain; 1 patient underwent fusion with 5/10 pain, and 1 patient experienced medial malleolar mal-union with 3/10 pain. Conclusion: It was found that the main reason for syndesmosis revision was reoccurring diastasis. Most patients ultimately experienced good reduction and were able to ambulate, despite some residual pain. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve: A review.

The palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBm) supplies afferent innervation to the volar aspect of the hand. It consistently originates from the radial side of the median nerve, travels in relation to the tendons of the palmaris longus and flexor carpi radialis muscles, and courses superficially through fascial planes to reach the surface of the palm. Because it is at risk of injury in numerous operations, this review serves to provide a summary of anatomical findings regarding the PCBm across various studies to aid orthopedists and other clinicians in anticipating the location of the nerve during surgical procedures.

A systematic review of the causes of failure of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This study reviewed literature published in the last 10 years to investigate the reasons for revision failure. A total of 9952 revisions were identified and it was determined that the number one cause of failure was aseptic loosening (23.19%), followed by instability (22.43%) and infection (22.13%). Further analysis of applicable revisions investigated BMI and age at the failure rates. The rate of rerevision in obese patients was markedly higher (p < 0.01) compared to non-obese patients and individuals receiving a revision THA under the age of 55 are at a higher risk of rerevision (p < 0.01).

Linkage of microbiota and osteoporosis: A mini literature review.

The gut microbiota (GM) has become a recent topic of interest in the role of many disease states. Assessing patients with osteoporosis (OP), there is a strong correlation between gut microbe dysregulation and decreased bone density. Gut dysbiosis may lead to inflammation, dysregulation of nutrient and calcium transport across the intestine into circulation and systemic inflammation. Investigation of microbial profile relative to normal gut microbiomes, assessment of inflammatory markers such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Therapies to normalize GM in patients with OP or prevent occurrence of OP to be investigated include: High fiber prebiotic diets to promote growth of normal gut bacteria and short chain fatty acid production, Probiotics to encourage growth of normal gut microbes, and antibiotic treatment followed by fecal matter transplant.

Comprehensive Summary of Anastomoses between the Median and Ulnar Nerves in the Forearm and Hand.

Four main presentations of median-ulnar anastomosis exist. Those manifesting in the forearm include Martin-Gruber and Marinacci, while those found in the hand are referred to as Riche-Cannieu and Berrettini. Martin-Gruber anastomosis involves branching of the median nerve proximally to ulnar nerve distally. Marinacci anastomosis, the rarest of all the presentations, is often termed reverse Martin-Gruber, with the ulnar nerve stemming proximally to meet the median nerve distally in the forearm. Riche-Cannieu anastomosis occurs as an interconnection between the recurrent branch of the median nerve and the deep branch of the ulnar nerve in the hand. Berrettini anastomosis is the most frequently encountered of the anomalies and is described as a neural connection between common digital nerves of the ulnar and median nerves. Due to altered innervation patterns, musculoskeletal disorders of the forearm and hand may present with misleading symptoms. Additionally, existence of an anastomosis may require an alteration of surgical methods or be a source of iatrogenic injury. Consequently, knowledge of these anastomoses is crucial to clinical practice. Therefore, the objective of this review is to concisely present the most relevant information regarding median and ulnar anastomoses in the forearm and hand.

Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Dysfunction: A Systematic Literature Review of Dynamic Versus Static Fixation Over the Last 10 Years.

The goal of the present work was to perform a systematic review of the literature of the past 10 years regarding dynamic and static fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis to determine any clinical differences between the 2 procedures. A literature search of the PubMed MEDLINE database was conducted to identify relevant studies related to distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Studies before January 1, 2007, were excluded to limit the project to the recent literature. Clinical outcomes, device removal rates, time to weightbearing after the initial procedure, and the cost effectiveness of each device were explored. In these 26 studies, 350 patients were treated using a dynamic technique and 845 were treated using a static technique. The weighted American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score was 91.70 (standard error [SE] 1.87) for dynamic fixation patients and the weighted average was 86.48 (SE 2.17) for static fixation patients (p = .068). A secondary procedure to remove the fixation device was performed in 7.7% of dynamic fixation patients and in 39.4% of static fixation patients when studies with 100% device removal were excluded (p < .0001). The mean time to weightbearing was 5.96 (SE 0.72) weeks for patients who underwent dynamic fixation and 10.45 (SE 0.99) weeks for those who had static fixation (p = .0002). The cost for dynamic fixation was found to be less than that for static fixation when secondary procedures for device removal were considered. Based on similar clinical functional scores, lower secondary procedure rates, faster time to full weightbearing, and lower costs to patients, dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis may be a superior option compared with static fixation.