Desmoid tumors (fibromatoses) of the breast: a 25-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Breast desmoid tumors are rare and often clinically mistaken for carcinoma. We reviewed our 25-year institutional experience with breast desmoid tumors. METHODS: A search of pathology and sarcoma databases (1982-2006) identified 32 patients with pathologically confirmed breast desmoids. Records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Median presentation age was 45 years (range, 22-76). Eight patients (25%) had prior history of breast cancer and 14 (44%) of breast surgery, with desmoids diagnosed a median of 24 months postoperatively. All presented with physical findings. Mammography visualized the mass in 6/16, ultrasound in 9/9, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 8/8 patients in whom it was performed. In 15 patients with attempted needle biopsy, fine needle aspiration was inconclusive (9/9 patients), and core biopsy demonstrated a spindle cell lesion (6/7 patients). Treatment was surgical, with median tumor size of 2.5 cm (range, 0.3-15). Eight patients (29%) had recurring tumors at a median 15 months. Patients with recurring tumors were younger (median age: 28 vs. 46 years, p = 0.03). A trend toward more frequent recurrences in patients with positive (5/9 patients) versus negative (3/19 patients) margins (p = 0.07) and larger tumors (p = 0.12) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, breast desmoids presented as palpable masses suspicious for carcinoma clinically and radiographically. Therapy remains primarily surgical, and core biopsy aided in operative planning. Recurrences are common, with younger age and possibly positive margin status and larger tumor size associated with increased risk of recurrence. As 5/9 patients with positive and 3/19 patients with negative margins experienced recurrences, clinical judgment should be used prior to extensive and potentially deforming resections.

Adequacy of physician documentation of red blood cell transfusion and correlation with assessment of transfusion appropriateness.

CONTEXT: A major function of the hospital transfusion service is to assess the appropriateness of blood transfusion. Inadequate documentation of transfusions may hamper this assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the level of physician documentation of transfusion with the ability to justify transfusion. DESIGN: Retrospective review of red blood cell transfusions in adult patients in 2 hospital facilities during 1-week audit periods of each month from April 2001 to March 2003. Assessment forms were used to classify the level of physician documentation of transfusions into 3 groups: adequately, intermediately, and inadequately documented. Transfusions were deemed justified or not via comparison with hospital transfusion guidelines. RESULTS: There were 5062 audited red blood cells transfused to 2044 adult (> or = 18 years) patients. Medical records from 154 patients transfused with 257 units of red blood cells during 172 transfusion events were reviewed after initial screenings of hemoglobin/hematocrit values failed to justify the transfusions. Nine percent of adequately documented, 50% of intermediately documented, and 73% of inadequately documented transfusion events could not be justified. Transfusion events with suboptimal (intermediate and inadequate) documentation accounted for 49% of all medical record-reviewed transfusion events and 62% could not be justified. The correlation between inadequate documentation and failure to justify transfusion was significant (P < .001), as was the correlation between suboptimal documentation and failure to justify transfusion (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between suboptimal documentation and failure to justify transfusions. Educating clinicians to improve documentation along with appropriate indications for transfusions may enhance efficiency of blood utilization assessment and lead to reduced rates of unjustifiable transfusions.