Total hip arthroplasty in acute acetabulum fractures: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of acetabular fractures has increased significantly in recent years due to demographic change. It can be divided into high-energy acetabular fractures primarily seen in adult patients versus geriatric patients mostly suffering from low-energy trauma. Historically, acetabular fractures have been treated either non-operatively or surgically following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), whereas nowadays total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides a true alternative. Aim of this study was to perform a systematic review on the outcome following THA in acute acetabulum fractures. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane and Google databases were systematically searched on December 9, 2021. The key terms were [acetabular fracture] AND [[arthroplasty] OR [fixation]]. All retrospective and prospective original studies in English and German were analyzed the outcome following THA in acute acetabulum fractures were included. RESULTS: A total of 2459 studies were screened, which includes 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 590 patients at a mean age of 61.3 years (SD 11.48). Most studies described good to excellent results. Especially, THA allows elderly patients quicker mobilization and rehabilitation as well as symptomatic relief, as compared to ORIF or non-operative treatment. Patients who underwent non-operative treatment showed better results compared to those who underwent ORIF initially. CONCLUSION: In acetabulum fractures, THA provides a good alternative with very good results when patients are carefully selected. Good to excellent outcomes are reported for both acute and delayed use of THA in elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, systematic review.

Modular uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty in young versus elderly patients: a good alternative?

For revision hip arthroplasty, both cemented and cementless techniques have been described for implantation of modular and non-modular implants. Although many articles have been published on non-modular prosthesis, there is a dearth of data on cementless, modular revision arthroplasty in young patients. This study aims to analyze the complication rate of modular tapered stems in young patients below 65 years of age as compared to elderly patients older than 85 years old, in order to predict the complication rate. A retrospective study was performed using a major revision hip arthroplasty center database. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing modular, cementless revision total hip arthroplasties. Data on demographics, functional outcome, intraoperative, early and medium term complications were assessed. In total, 42 patients met inclusion criteria (<65 years old: 25 patients; >85 years old: 17 patients). For the <65 years old cohort, the mean age and follow-up time was 55.4 ± 9.3 years old and 13.3 ± 13.2 months, respectively. For the >85 years old cohort, the mean age and follow-up time was 87.6 ± 2.1 years old and 4.3±8.8 years, respectively. For intraoperative and short-term complications, no significant differences were observed. Medium term complication is noted in 23.8% (n=10/42) overall, preferentially affecting the elderly group at 41.2% (only 12.0% in the younger cohort; p=0.029). To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the complication rate and implant survival for modular revision hip arthroplasty based on age group. It shows that the complication rate is significantly lower in young patients and age should be a consideration in surgical decision making.