Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Med ; 176: 107662, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37573952

ABSTRACT

In two randomized controlled trials, culturally adapted contingency management (i.e., incentives provided for substance-negative urine samples) was associated with reduced alcohol and drug use among geographically diverse American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults. In response to interest in contingency management from other Tribal and AI/AN communities, our research team in collaboration with AI/AN behavioral health experts, translated the research into practice with new AI/AN community partners. Tenets of community-based participatory research were applied to develop, pilot, and refine contingency management training and implementation tools, and identify implementation challenges. In partnership with the AI/AN communities, four members of the university team developed tools and identified implementation and policy strategies to increase the successful uptake of contingency management in each location. Through our collaborative work, we identified policy barriers including inadequate federal funding of contingency management incentives and a need for further clarity regarding federal anti-kickback regulations. Adoption of contingency management is feasible and can strengthen Tribal communities' capacity to deliver evidence-based substance use disorder treatments to AI/AN people. Unfortunately, non-evidence-based limits to the use of federal funding for contingency management incentives discriminate against AI/AN communities. We recommend specific federal policy reforms, as well as other practical solutions for Tribal communities interested in contingency management.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , American Indian or Alaska Native , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Humans , Behavior Therapy , Policy , United States , Culturally Competent Care , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control
2.
J Psychoactive Drugs ; 43(4): 269-75, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22400456

ABSTRACT

Indigenous populations in the U.S. and Pacific Islands are underrepresented in mental health and substance abuse research, are underserved, and have limited access to mainstream providers. Often, they receive care that is low quality and culturally inappropriate, resulting in compromised service outcomes. The First Nations Behavioral Health Association (U.S.) and the Pacific Substance Abuse and Mental Health Collaborating Council (Pacific Jurisdictions), have developed a Compendium of Best Practices for American Indian/Alaska Native and Pacific Island Populations. The private and public sector's increasing reliance on evidence-based practices (EBP) leaves many Indigenous communities at a disadvantage. For example, funding sources may require the use of EBP without awareness of its cultural usefulness to the local Indigenous population. Indigenous communities are then faced with having to select an EBP that is rooted in non-native social and cultural contexts with no known effectiveness in an Indigenous community. The field of cultural competence has tried to influence mainstream research, and the escalating requirement of EBP use. These efforts have given rise to the practice-based evidence (PBE) and the community-defined evidence (CDE) fields. All of these efforts, ranging from evidence-based practice to community-defined evidence, have a shared goal: practice improvement.


Subject(s)
Community Networks , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Health Services, Indigenous/organization & administration , Community Mental Health Services , Health Services, Indigenous/economics , Health Services, Indigenous/supply & distribution , Humans , Mental Health , Pacific Islands/ethnology , Substance-Related Disorders , United States/ethnology
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17602391

ABSTRACT

This article describes the collective experience of a multidisciplinary network of researchers, practitioners, and program evaluators who support appropriate research and evaluation methods in working with Native peoples. Our experience underlines the critical importance of culture in understanding and conducting research with the diverse populations of American Indians and Alaska Natives, and documents the need for community-based, collaborative, participatory action research. We discuss the major findings of the first American Indian Research and Program Evaluation Methodology national symposium, and articulate a set of 20 guiding principles for conducting research and program evaluation.


Subject(s)
American Indian or Alaska Native , Cultural Diversity , Program Evaluation/methods , Research Design , American Indian or Alaska Native/ethnology , American Indian or Alaska Native/statistics & numerical data , Community Participation , Ethics, Research , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , North America , Research/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...