Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.

Waveform parameters may affect the efficacy of ventricular defibrillation. Certain biphasic pulse waveforms are more effective for ventricular defibrillation than monophasic waveforms, but the optimal biphasic waveform parameters have not been identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of total pulse duration and the duration of the second (negative) phase on voltage and energy defibrillation requirements using biphasic waveforms. Defibrillation efficacy was evaluated in an isolated rabbit heart model using the Langendorff technique. The biphasic waveform was a truncated exponential with the initial voltage of the second phase equal to 50% of the final voltage of the first phase. An up/down protocol was used to determine the 50% probability-of-success levels (E50) for delivered energy and initial voltage. First, using pulse waveforms with equal positive and negative phase durations, test waveforms with total durations of 4 ms (2 ms positive + 2 ms negative), 6 ms (3 + 3 ms), and 16 ms (8 + 8 ms) were compared to the control waveform of 8 ms (4 + 4 ms) in 30 experiments. Defibrillation voltage requirements with 4 ms (174 +/- 56 V) were higher (P = 0.001) compared to 8 ms (127 +/- 49 V). Defibrillation voltage requirements for the 6-ms and 16-ms waveforms were similar to the 8-ms control waveform. Delivered energies tended to be higher with the 4-ms waveform. A second series of 40 experiments were performed to compare monophasic (4 + 0 ms) and three asymmetric biphasic waveforms (4 + 2 ms, 4 + 8 ms, and 4 + 16 ms) to the symmetric control waveform (4 + 4 ms). The monophasic (2.15 +/- 1.21 J) and the 4 + 16 ms waveform (1.86 +/- 1.09 J) required higher energies (P < or = 0.05) than the control waveform (1.24 +/- 0.41 J and 0.87 +/- 0.7 J, respectively). The monophasic waveform also resulted in greater voltage requirements (223 +/- 64 V) compared to the control waveform (160 +/- 26 V) (P = 0.02). Energy and voltage requirements were similar for the 4 + 2 ms and 4 + 8 ms waveforms compared to the control. Defibrillation requirements with biphasic waveforms were affected by total and second phase duration. For waveforms with equal phase durations, total durations between 6-16 ms resulted in the lowest values for defibrillation. For waveforms with variable second (negative) phase durations, durations ranging from 50%-200% of the first phase did not affect defibrillation efficacy.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in coronary artery disease: relation to inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. MUSTT Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Many physicians believe that electrocardiographic characteristics of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia correlate with the risk for sudden death in survivors of myocardial infarction. Sustained ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation has also been shown to predict sudden death. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia can predict the inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease having abnormal ventricular function. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: 70 clinical electrophysiology laboratories in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: 1480 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less, and asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. INTERVENTION: Electrophysiologic study attempting to induce sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. MEASUREMENTS: Daily frequency, duration, and cycle length of spontaneous episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, measured by standard electrocardiographic recordings. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the frequency or duration of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was seen between patients with and those without inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Rates of spontaneous tachycardia were slightly slower in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia than in patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia (P = 0.047), but the difference was not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia do not predict which patients with coronary artery disease will have inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia.

Interaction of ischaemia and encainide/flecainide treatment: a proposed mechanism for the increased mortality in CAST I.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an interaction between encainide or flecainide and intercurrent ischaemia could account for the observed increase in cardiac and sudden deaths in the study group in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) I. DESIGN: CAST I was a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study in which patients received the drug which suppressed at least 6 premature ventricular contractions per minute by 80% or episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia by 90%. Arrhythmic sudden death or aborted sudden death were the study end points. Measured secondary end points included recurrent myocardial infarction, new or increasing angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, and syncope. The CAST I database was analysed to determine which of three end points occurred first--cardiac death or cardiac arrest, angina pectoris, or non-fatal recurrent infarction. They were regarded as mutually exclusive end points. The triad of cardiac or sudden arrhythmic death plus congestive heart failure and syncope was similarly analysed. RESULTS: It was assumed that recurrent non-fatal infarction and new or increasing angina pectoris were ischaemic in origin. The sum of these non-fatal ischaemic end points and sudden death were nearly identical in the placebo group (N = 129) and the treatment group (N = 131). The one year event rate in each group was 21%. However, the treatment group had a much greater fatality rate (55 v 17; P < 0.0001) than the placebo group. The same relation was found when the data were examined on the basis of drug exposure rather than intention to treat. The temporal and circadian events were similar in each group and were consistent with an ischaemic pattern. No such patterns emerged from analysis of the presumed non-ischaemic end points of congestive heart failure and syncope. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the interaction between active ischaemia and treatment with encainide or flecainide may have been responsible for the increased mortality seen in the treatment group in CAST I. This conversion of a non-fatal to a fatal event emphasises the need for future antiarrhythmic drugs to be screened in ischaemic models.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of dofetilide in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: Dofetilide is a new antiarrhythmic agent with potent IK blocking properties in vitro. We developed a dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study design to define the range of effective doses and to evaluate the clinical electrophysiology of intravenous dofetilide in patients in whom sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was reproducibly inducible at baseline electrophysiologic testing. METHODS AND RESULTS: The initial four patients received low doses that were increased in subsequent groups of four if adverse effects were absent. In each group of four patients, one patient was randomly assigned to placebo (double blind). Twenty-four patients were studied at six incremental loading and maintenance infusion regimens. Dofetilide (0.1 to 8.0 ng/mL) produced concentration-related increases in the % delta of QT (r = 0.79, P < 0.001), QTc (r = 0.60, P = 0.02), RR (r = 0.62, P < 0.02), and right ventricular effective refractory period (cycle length 600 msec; r = 0.68, P = 0.04). Placebo produced no changes in any of these measurements. Sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was no longer inducible in 1 of 6 patients receiving placebo and 8 of 18 receiving dofetilide (4 to 13 sec nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was induced in 4 of these 8). One patient developed torsades de pointes at a high concentration (5.3 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that: (1) dofetilide produces concentration-related IK blocking effects in patients; (2) an incremental dose-ranging study design aids in identifying the range of doses demonstrating electrophysiologic effects and efficacy; (3) a concomitant placebo group provides important data to assess reproducibility of results over time; and (4) further studies of dofetilide's efficacy and toxicity should be conducted.

Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators.

All transthoracic defibrillators on the US market use nominally monophasic shock waveforms. However, biphasic waveforms have a lower defibrillation threshold than monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation of animals and for defibrillation of humans by implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The relative efficacies of Edmark monophasic and Gurvich biphasic transthoracic cardioversion waveforms (200 J into 50 omega) were compared for transthoracic cardioversion in 171 patients undergoing electrophysiologic study for evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were randomized in a blinded fashion to receive either a monophasic or a biphasic waveform for the initial shock for conversion of induced ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation [VF] = 53, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia [VT] = 80, polymorphic VT = 30, ventricular flutter = 8). Delivered energies for the Edmark and Gurvich waveforms were 215 +/- 11 and 171 +/- 11 J, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, use of antiarrhythmic agents, arrhythmia cycle length, or duration of arrhythmia prior to shock for monophasic and biphasic waveform groups. The first shock for all arrhythmias was successful in 75 of 88 patients (85.2%) for the monophasic waveform compared with 81 of 83 patients (97.6%) for the biphasic waveform, p = 0.0054. The first shock for VF was successful in 22 of 28 patients (78.6%) for the monophasic waveform compared with 25 of 25 (100%) for the biphasic waveform, p = 0.0241. The Gurvich biphasic waveforms delivering a mean of 171 J were superior to Edmark monophasic waveforms delivering a mean of 215 J for transthoracic cardioversion of arrhythmias of short duration. This finding may have important implications for the development of future transthoracic defibrillators.

Effects of procainamide and lidocaine on defibrillation energy requirements in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator devices.

INTRODUCTION: In acute canine studies, lidocaine, but not procainamide, increases defibrillation energy requirements. We evaluated the effects of lidocaine or procainamide on defibrillation energy requirements in 27 patients undergoing intraoperative testing for implantable cardioverter defibrillator device placement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were tested off antiarrhythmic drugs and again following either lidocaine (200 to 250 mg loading and 3 mg/min maintenance infusions) or procainamide (1 gm loading and 3 to 4 mg/min maintenance infusions). The defibrillation testing protocol consisted of initial testing at 15 J, followed by higher or lower energies to determine the lowest energy producing three consecutive successful defibrillations. Overall, the mean defibrillation energy increased from 14 +/- 5 J to 18 +/- 7 J during lidocaine (plasma concentration 5.1 +/- 1.6 micrograms/mL; P < 0.02) but were similar at baseline (12 +/- 5 J) and during procainamide infusion (13 +/- 6 J) (plasma concentration: procainamide 10.7 +/- 7.2 micrograms/mL; N-acetyl procainamide 1.0 +/- 0.4 micrograms/mL). A positive linear correlation was found between lidocaine plasma concentration and percent change in defibrillation energy (lidocaine: r = 0.61; P = 0.01). Procainamide raised the defibrillation energy in three patients, two with supratherapeutic plasma concentrations. The increase in defibrillation energy equaled or exceeded 25 J in four patients after lidocaine and in one patient after procainamide. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that at high plasma concentrations, lidocaine and procainamide adversely affect defibrillation energy requirements consistent with an adverse, concentration-dependent effect of sodium channel blockade on defibrillation energy requirements in patients.

Circadian pattern of arrhythmic death in patients receiving encainide, flecainide or moricizine in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on the timing of arrhythmic death. BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death remains a problem of epidemic proportions. Delineating its pathophysiology is an important step in devising preventive measures. Previous studies have shown a circadian pattern of onset of sudden cardiac death. The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on this pattern has not been systematically studied. METHODS: The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) was a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to determine whether suppression of ventricular ectopic activity by means of antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide or moricizine) after acute myocardial infarction would reduce the incidence of arrhythmic death. RESULTS: The trial was terminated prematurely because of an unexpectedly high mortality rate in the active treatment group. The onset of arrhythmic death in this group (in patients not receiving beta-adrenergic blocking agents) displayed a bimodal variation, with significant peaks in midmorning and late afternoon/early evening. More than half of the symptomatic events were accompanied by anginalike symptoms. Approximately 30% of all events occurred within 2 h of awakening. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the possibility of a complex interaction among antiarrhythmic drugs, sympathetic nervous system activation and acute myocardial ischemia. Planning of future antiarrhythmic drug trials will need to take this information into account.

Prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease: the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT).

This trial will significantly advance our understanding of the prognostic and therapeutic usefulness of electrophysiologic studies in patients with coronary artery disease. Several features of this trial are worth emphasizing. First, the protocol for performing programmed stimulation and serial drug testing is designed to mirror those currently in use by many practicing electrophysiologists. While practice patterns vary, the procedures used in the trial reflect what is considered "usual and standard" practice. Second, because half of the patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia will be given no antiarrhythmic therapy, we will be able to ascertain the true risk of sudden death in this patient population without the influence of these agents. Third, this trial will assess the usefulness of a method of guiding antiarrhythmic therapy (electrophysiologic testing) to reduce mortality in this high-risk population. It will not evaluate the efficacy of a specific type of antiarrhythmic therapy.

Ventricular defibrillation in canines with chronic infarction, and effects of lidocaine and procainamide.

Prior studies in dogs with normal hearts have demonstrated that lidocaine increases but procainamide does not change the energy required for successful defibrillation. Because many postinfarct patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator devices require adjunctive antiarrhythmic therapy, we have studied the effects of lidocaine and procainamide on the relationship between delivered voltage and defibrillation success in mongrel dogs 21 +/- 3 days following ligation of the left anterior descending and first diagonal coronary arteries. Internal defibrillation testing using a patch-patch electrode configuration was performed before and during the administration of saline controls (n = 10), lidocaine (n = 10) and procainamide (n = 10). The mean infarct size as determined by staining with tetrazolium was 13.4% +/- 8.3% of right and left ventricles, and did not differ significantly between groups. The 50% effective defibrillation (ED50) voltage increased with infusions of saline (16% +/- 15%), lidocaine (40% +/- 22%), and procainamide (13% +/- 15%) and the ED50 energy increased 41% +/- 44%, 104% +/- 62%, and 35% +/- 36%, respectively. However, the increase in ED50 voltages and energies were significantly greater in animals receiving lidocaine compared to those receiving either saline control or procainamide (P < 0.01). There were trends toward change of hemodynamic parameters in all animals following baseline defibrillation testing; stroke volume declined 21% +/- 16%; and mean pulmonary artery and aortic pressure increased by 22% +/- 25% and 11% +/- 15%, respectively. In conclusion, unlike our previous studies in dogs with normal hearts, in this model hemodynamic deterioration occurred with repeated fibrillation and defibrillation, and defibrillation voltage requirements increased in the control series. Taking into consideration the increase in defibrillation voltage requirements over the duration of the experiments, lidocaine increases and procainamide does not change ED50; thus, their effects are similar in normal and infarcted canine hearts.

Effects of verapamil and Bay K 8644 on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs.

Antiarrhythmic drugs are often required in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices. Prior evidence suggests that drugs modulate defibrillation energy requirements by altering ion channel activity. To evaluate the effects of calcium ion channel activity on internal defibrillation energy requirements, the calcium antagonist verapamil and Bay K 8644, a calcium channel activator, were investigated in 30 open-chest, pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Defibrillation energies were applied across two epicardial patch electrodes. The likelihood of successful defibrillation was determined at various shock energy levels, and the 50 and 90% effective energy doses were calculated using nonlinear regression. In saline control experiments (n = 10), the stability of the preparation throughout the 6-h duration of the experiments could be demonstrated. Verapamil administration (n = 10) infused to a mean plasma concentration of 69 ng/ml increased the 50 and 90% effective defibrillation energies by 41 and 43% (p less than 0.05), respectively, and to a mean plasma verapamil concentration of 170 ng/ml by 95 and 75% (p less than 0.01), respectively. The mean cycle length during ventricular fibrillation decreased with verapamil and was inversely related to the change in defibrillation energy requirement. Administration of Bay K 8644 (n = 10) produced a slight increase in the 50% effective defibrillation energy (25%; p less than 0.05) and 90% effective defibrillation energy (17%; n.s.). The electrophysiologic effects of verapamil were neither prevented nor reversed by Bay K 8644. In conclusion, intravenous verapamil administration caused an increase in defibrillation energy requirements, but the mechanism by which verapamil exerted this effect remains unclear. These experimental data suggest that verapamil should be used in patients with automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices only after individual testing.

Intravenous 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl-encainide in reentrant supraventricular tachycardia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing EP study.

Encainide is an agent effective in atrioventricular and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The metabolites O-desmethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (MODE) are responsible for the clinical effects of encainide in most patients. In this study, intravenous MODE was evaluated in eight patients with reentrant supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiological testing. After tachycardia was induced at least twice to ensure reproducibility, MODE (30 micrograms/kg/min x 15 min, then 7.5 micrograms/kg/min) or placebo was administered in a double-blind fashion. If tachycardia remained inducible, the infusion was unblinded; in nonresponding subjects who received placebo, MODE was then administered. Placebo was ineffective in 3/3 patients. MODE prevented tachycardia induction in 5/8 patients and increased the tachycardia cycle length from 302 +/- 38 to 413 +/- 67 msec in the other three. At a mean concentration of 774 +/- 229 ng/ml, MODE prolonged PR, AH, HV, QRS, and QT intervals, right ventricular and accessory pathway effective refractory periods, and slowed or blocked antegrade accessory pathway conduction. Changes in intracardiac conduction were rate independent between cycle lengths 400 to 600 msec, while changes in ventricular effective refractory periods were most pronounced at rapid pacing rates. No adverse effects, hemodynamic changes, or conduction disturbances occurred. Thus, MODE can modify or suppress induction of reentrant atrioventricular or atrioventricular nodal tachycardia. The study design used here is well suited for the evaluation of newer antiarrhythmic agents by electrophysiological testing.

Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular ectopy after a myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of sudden death, patients in whom ventricular ectopy could be suppressed with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine were randomly assigned to receive either active drug or placebo. The use of encainide and flecainide was discontinued because of excess mortality. We examined the mortality and morbidity after randomization to encainide or flecainide or their respective placebo. RESULTS: Of 1498 patients, 857 were assigned to receive encainide or its placebo (432 to active drug and 425 to placebo) and 641 were assigned to receive flecainide or its placebo (323 to active drug and 318 to placebo). After a mean follow-up of 10 months, 89 patients had died: 59 of arrhythmia (43 receiving drug vs. 16 receiving placebo; P = 0.0004), 22 of nonarrhythmic cardiac causes (17 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo; P = 0.01), and 8 of noncardiac causes (3 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo). Almost all cardiac deaths not due to arrhythmia were attributed to acute myocardial infarction with shock (11 patients receiving drug and 3 receiving placebo) or to chronic congestive heart failure (4 receiving drug and 2 receiving placebo). There were no differences between the patients receiving active drug and those receiving placebo in the incidence of nonlethal disqualifying ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, syncope, need for a permanent pacemaker, congestive heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, angina, or need for coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: There was an excess of deaths due to arrhythmia and deaths due to shock after acute recurrent myocardial infarction in patients treated with encainide or flecainide. Nonlethal events, however, were equally distributed between the active-drug and placebo groups. The mechanisms underlying the excess mortality during treatment with encainide or flecainide remain unknown.

Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.

We have developed a two-dimensional finite element model of the canine heart and thorax to examine different aspects of the distribution of current through cardiac tissue during defibrillation. This model allows us to compare various electrode configurations for the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. Since we do not yet know the electrical criteria to apply for predicting defibrillation thresholds, such as the minimum current density required for defibrillation or the critical mass if indeed such quantities are applicable, we measured defibrillation energy in dogs to determine the voltages to apply to the model for calculating current distributions. By analyzing isopotential contours, current lines, power distributions, current density histograms, and cumulative current distributions, we estimated the critical fraction and threshold current density for defibrillation, compared various electrode configurations, and assessed the sensitivity of the defibrillation threshold to electrode position, patch size, and tissue conductivity. We found that blood can shunt defibrillation current away from the myocardium, particularly in configurations using a two-electrode catheter, that myocardial tissue conductivity strongly affects the current distributions, and that epicardial patch size is more important that subcutaneous patch size. Our results are consistent with successful defibrillation requiring that 80 +/- 5% of the heart must be rendered inexcitable by a current density of 35 +/- 5 mA/cm2 or greater. This two-dimensional, isotropic model has allowed us to analyze some of the determinants of defibrillation, but more detailed interpretation of experimental data may require the extension of the model to three dimensions.

Antiarrhythmic efficacy, clinical electrophysiology, and pharmacokinetics of 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (MODE) in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation.

In most patients, the clinical effects of therapy with encainide are mediated by the generation of the active metabolites O-desmethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-desmethyl encainide (MODE). Data from in vitro and animal studies have indicated that MODE has electrophysiologic and pharmacokinetic features that make its further evaluation desirable; in earlier studies, we found that MODE suppressed chronic high-frequency nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias at plasma concentrations of 50-160 ng/ml. We now report the clinical electrophysiology, antiarrhythmic activity, and pharmacokinetics of MODE in 17 patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) in whom programmed electrical stimulation was performed before drug administration and after one or two sequences of loading and maintenance infusions of MODE. Because the relation between plasma concentration and effect had been incompletely defined, a dose-titration approach was adopted: available pharmacokinetic data were used to construct loading and maintenance infusion regimens that were predicted to attain low plasma concentrations in initial patients while higher infusion rates were evaluated in subsequent patients. MODE prevented VT induction in three of 17 patients and VT cycle length was increased by greater than or equal to 100 msec in a further seven of 17; most responses to MODE occurred at plasma concentrations greater than 556 ng/ml (greater than 1 SD above mean plasma MODE during encainide therapy). Response to MODE did not predict subsequent response to oral therapy with encainide. MODE increased intracardiac conduction times, QT intervals during atrial and ventricular pacing, and right ventricular effective refractory periods (RVERP); changes in RVERP were most prominent at rapid pacing rates, while changes in intracardiac conduction were rate-independent at cycle lengths between 400 and 600 msec. Plasma MODE concentrations measured during electrophysiology study correlated well with those predicted by the pharmacokinetic simulations (r = 0.91, p less than 0.001). Serial plasma sampling after programmed electrical stimulation indicated a minimum MODE elimination half-life of 8.2 +/- 5.4 hours. Side effects were confined to three instances of asymptomatic conduction system depression in subjects with latent conduction system disturbances. We conclude that MODE slows intracardiac conduction, delays repolarization, and can suppress or substantially modify inducible VT. Moreover, it was only with the adoption of the dose-titration strategy that we were able to safely demonstrate that plasma MODE concentrations higher than those routinely observed during encainide therapy were required to substantially alter cardiac electrophysiology.

pH-dependent effects of lidocaine on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs.

Lidocaine increases the energy required for ventricular defibrillation in dogs. Because sodium channel-blocking agents that are weak bases have pH-dependent electrophysiologic effects, we investigated the pH dependence of lidocaine (pKa, 7.9) on internal defibrillation energy requirements in 28 dogs with atrial spring and left ventricular patch electrodes. Results of defibrillation testing were used to derive 50% and 90% successful energy requirements (ED50 and ED90) using logistic regression and were compared with analysis of variance. Acidosis produced by hydrochloric acid infusion decreased the arterial pH from 7.40 +/- 0.05 (SD) to 7.18 +/- 0.03 (n = 8, p less than 0.01), but no significant change in ED90 was observed (14 +/- 4 to 16 +/- 6 J). Lidocaine infusion to therapeutic levels (4.2 +/- .07 micrograms/ml) at normal pH (7.42 +/- 0.02) increased ED90 from 13 +/- 3 to 17 +/- 3 J (n = 6, p less than 0.05), and subsequent acidosis (pH 7.19 +/- 0.02, p less than 0.01) exacerbated this effect of lidocaine on ED90 (22 +/- 5 J, p less than 0.05). Alkalosis produced by respirator hyperventilation increased the arterial pH from 7.41 +/- 0.03 to 7.60 +/- 0.03 (n = 8, p less than 0.01), with a fall in ED90 from 13 +/- 4 to 8 +/- 3 J (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Recainam dose titration and pharmacokinetics in patients with resistant arrhythmias.

Recainam, a new antiarrhythmic drug, was evaluated in 20 patients with drug-resistant stable ventricular arrhythmias. Dosage was increased stepwise every 48 to 72 hours until arrhythmia suppression, side effects, or a predetermined maximal dosage occurred. After a pharmacokinetic evaluation, efficacy was confirmed in a double-blind, crossover protocol. One patient had unusable ambulatory ECG data. There were 14 of 19 patients who responded during dose titration; efficacy was confirmed in 11 of 14. The mean effective dosage and trough plasma concentration were 427 mg every 8 hours and 1.83 micrograms/ml, respectively. One patient withdrew because of nausea. Slowing of intraventricular conduction necessitated dosage reduction in two patients. Plasma half-life was 9.4 +/- 4.1 hours, with renal elimination accounting for 62% of oral clearance. However, 66% of the variability in oral drug clearance was the result of nonrenal elimination. Oral recainam at dosages of 300 to 600 mg every 8 hours is effective in some drug-resistant ventricular arrhythmias and is well tolerated.

Long-term results of antitachycardia pacing in patients with supraventricular tachycardia.

Between 1979 and 1984 the Cybertach-60, (Intermedics, Inc. Model 262-01), a programmable, automatic antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 11 patients who had drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The patients have been followed for a total of 64-108 (mean 84 months). All patients were symptomatic and had failed two or more drugs and six patients had required prior DC cardioversion. The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia was atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry in six patients, AV reentry in four patients, and atrial tachycardia in one patient. Preoperatively all patients had reliable termination of the tachycardia without induction of atrial fibrillation by pacing methods available to Cybertach-60. Postimplant, Cybertach-60 reliably terminated all episodes of tachycardia without ancillary drug therapy. Nevertheless, at long-term follow-up antitachycardia pacing was effective and safe in the minority (36%), with only four patients out of eleven still using a pacemaker for supraventricular tachycardia. One of these four patients required additional drug therapy. In one of the patients, the Cybertach-60 was replaced after 78 months by a more advanced device, (Intertach, Intermedics, Inc.) because of a depleted Cybertach-60 battery. In seven patients who no longer use antitachycardia pacing for termination of tachycardia, one patient developed atrial fibrillation during tachycardia termination (at 58 months postimplant). Three patients experienced induction of tachycardia or atrial fibrillation by the pacemaker due to undersensing of sinus P waves (at 36, 48, and 51 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mexiletine and tocainide: a comparison of antiarrhythmic efficacy, adverse effects, and predictive value of lidocaine testing.

Thirty patients received one of the lidocaine analogues--mexiletine or tocainide--orally for treatment of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Crossover to the other analogue was allowed if initial drug treatment was unsuccessful, and the controlled use of other marketed oral antiarrhythmic agents was permitted. After follow-up of 7 +/- 3 months (SD), mexiletine was successful in 5 of 13 patients initially and in 5 of 14 patients who failed to respond to tocainide. Tocainide was successful in 1 of 17 patients initially and in 2 of 7 who did not respond to mexiletine. Combination therapy was used in nearly half of all ultimately successful drug trials. A common cause of drug trial failure for both drugs was the occurrence of adverse effects that frequently appeared well after hospital discharge. Response to lidocaine was a sensitive but nonspecific predictor of clinical outcome with mexiletine or tocainide that helped to identify drug-resistant patients. Finally, although mexiletine provided effective antiarrhythmic therapy more often than tocainide, response to one lidocaine analogue did not predict response to the other.

Evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs on defibrillation energy requirements in dogs. Sodium channel block and action potential prolongation.

Antiarrhythmic drugs have been reported to produce variable effects on defibrillation energy requirements. However, the relation between the in vitro electrophysiologic effects of these agents and the changes in defibrillation energy requirements have not been systematically examined. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of the sodium channel blocking drugs lidocaine and procainamide, the action potential prolonging drugs N-acetyl procainamide and clofilium, and the potassium current blocker cesium in acute canine models with the same internal spring and epicardial patch electrodes used in humans for ventricular defibrillation testing. Ten series of experiments were performed in 78 dogs. Nonlinear regression was used to derive curves of energy dose versus percent successful defibrillation attempts and the 50% and 90% effective energy dose for each experimental condition. Saline control experiments indicated that the preparation was stable throughout the 6-hour duration of the experiments. Lidocaine doubled the defibrillation energy requirement (p less than 0.001) at a mean plasma concentration of 8.2 micrograms/ml. The effect of lidocaine on defibrillation energy was reversible, present at therapeutic plasma concentrations, linearly related to plasma concentration (r = 0.69, p less than 0.002), and present even after only 5-second episodes of ventricular fibrillation. In contrast, procainamide had no effect on defibrillation energy at mean plasma concentrations of 8.5 and 13 micrograms/ml, even after prolonged (30-second) episodes of ventricular fibrillation, whereas N-acetyl procainamide, clofilium, and cesium all decreased the energy requirement for defibrillation by 13-27%. Moreover, with the addition of N-acetyl procainamide, there was a trend toward diminishing the increase in defibrillation energy requirement caused by lidocaine. All agents prolonged the mean ventricular fibrillation cycle length. Lidocaine shortened the QT interval, whereas all other agents increased the QT (p less than 0.05). The major electrophysiologic effect of lidocaine is of sodium channel blockade, whereas, N-acetyl procainamide, clofilium, and cesium predominantly increase the action potential duration, and procainamide exerts both effects. Thus, these data indicate that sodium channel block and action potential prolongation exert significant and antagonistic modulating effects on defibrillation energy requirements.

Congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving antiarrhythmic agents for ventricular premature complexes (Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study).

The Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) was a randomized, double-blind trial of antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide, moricizine, imipramine and placebo) in 502 patients with an ejection fraction greater than 0.20 and at least 10 ventricular premature complexes/hour, 6 to 60 days after acute myocardial infarction. Patients were followed for 1 year and the incidence of new or worsened congestive heart failure (CHF) was evaluated. Heart failure in the 1-year follow-up was gauged by the development (in order of increasing severity) of new symptoms (grade 1), the need for a change in therapy, including addition of digitalis, addition or increase of dose of diuretics or afterload reduction agents or discontinuation of beta-blocking agents (grade 2), or by hospitalization (grade 3). Sixty-one of 502 patients (12%) required hospitalization for CHF in the 1-year follow-up. One hundred five of 403 patients (26%) in the active treatment group and 18 of 99 patients (18%) in the placebo group (difference not significant) developed CHF requiring hospitalization or a change in therapy or both. Although patients with severely impaired ejection fraction were excluded, new or worsened CHF was common in follow-up during CAPS.