ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of utilizing the Sphinx Compact detector for quality assurance in a uniform scanning proton therapy system. METHOD: The Sphinx Compact detector was used to measure various dosimetric parameters of uniform scanning proton beam at the Oklahoma Proton Center: distal range, distal-fall-off, collinearity, field symmetry, flatness, and field size for four different beams. A specially designed brass aperture was used to perform the required measurements. The Sphinx Compact measurement results were validated against the measurement results from the well-established detectors in proton therapy: IBA Zebra, IBA MatriXX-PT, EBT3 films, and Logos XRV-124. The data collected using the Sphinx Compact was analyzed in myQA software. RESULTS: Based on the data analysis performed, the Sphinx Compact measurements were within acceptable accuracy to the results from the detectors mentioned in the Method section. Specifically, the lateral penumbra was within ±0.4 mm, collinearity was within ± 0.5 mm, flatness was within ±0.6 %, symmetry within ±1.6 %, distal range was within ±0.5 mm, distal-fall-off was <0.9 mm, and field size was within ±1 mm. The reproducibility of the Sphinx Compact was tested for range and collinearity, and the results were within ±0.1 mm. CONCLUSION: The sphinx Compact detector could potentially replace multiple detectors utilized for monthly QA in uniform scanning proton therapy. In a multi-room center, performing the QA with one detector compared to using multiple detectors dramatically reduces total QA time and the complexity of the QA process.
Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Proton Therapy/methods , Feasibility Studies , Protons , Reproducibility of Results , Radiometry , Radiotherapy DosageABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this work is to study the feasibility of using an XRV-124 scintillation detector in measuring the collinearity of the x-ray system and uniform scanning proton beam. Methods: A brass aperture for Snout 10 was manufactured. The center of the aperture had an opening of 1 cm in diameter (4 cm for the film measurements). The 2D kV x-ray images of the XRV-124 were acquired such that the marker inside the detector is aligned to the imaging isocenter. After obtaining the optimal camera settings, a uniform scanning proton beam was delivered for various ranges (12 g/cm2 to 28 g/cm2 in step size of 2 g/cm2). For each range, 10 monitor units (MU) of the first layer were delivered to the XRV-124 detector. Collinearity tests were repeated by using EDR2 and EBT3 films following our current quality assurance protocol in practice. The results from the XRV-124 measurements were compared against the collinearity results from EDR2 and EBT3 films. Results and Discussion: The collinearity results were evaluated in the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) directions. The average deviation in collinearity in the x-direction was -0.24 ± 0.30 mm, 0.57 ± 0.39 mm, and -0.27 ± 0.14 mm for EDR2, EBT3, and XRV-124, respectively. In the y-direction, the average deviation was 0.39 ± 0.07 mm, 0.29 ± 0.14 mm, and 0.39 ± 0.03 mm for EDR2, EBT3, and XRV-124, respectively. Conclusion: The measurement results from the XRV-124 and films are in good agreement. Compared to film, the use of the XRV-124 detector for collinearity measurements in uniform scanning protons is more efficient and provides results in real time.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) report the long-term monthly quality assurance (QA) dosimetry results of the uniform scanning beam delivery system, and (b) derive the machine-specific tolerances based on the statistic process control (SPC) methodology and compare them against the AAPM TG224 recommended tolerances. METHODS: The Oklahoma Proton Center has four treatment rooms (TR1, TR2, TR3, and TR4) with a cyclotron and a universal nozzle. Monthly QA dosimetry results of four treatment rooms over a period of 6 yr (Feb 2014-Jan 2020) were retrieved from the QA database. The dosimetry parameters included dose output, range, flatness, and symmetry. The monthly QA results were analyzed using the SPC method, which included individuals and moving range (I-MR) chart. The upper control limit (UCL) and lower control limit (LCL) were set at 3σ above and below the mean value, respectively. RESULTS: The mean difference in dose output was -0.3% (2σ = ±0.9% and 3σ = ±1.3%) in TR1, 0% (2σ = ±1.4% and 3σ = ±2.1%) in TR2, -0.2% (2σ = ±1.0% and 3σ = ±1.6%) in TR3, and -0.5% (2σ = ±0.9% and 3σ = ±1.3%) in TR4. The mean flatness and symmetry differences of all beams among the four treatment rooms were within ±1.0%. The 3σ for the flatness difference ranged from ±0.5% to ±1.2%. The 3σ for the symmetry difference ranged from ±0.4% to ±1.4%. The SPC analysis showed that the 3σ for range 10 cm (R10), R16, and R22 were within ±1 mm, whereas the 3σ for R28 exceeded ±1 mm in two rooms (3σ = ±1.9 mm in TR2 and 3σ = ±1.3 mm in TR3). CONCLUSION: The 3σ of the dose output, flatness, and symmetry differences in all four rooms were comparable to the TG224 tolerance (±2%). For the uniform scanning system, if the measured range is compared against the requested range, it may not always be possible to achieve the range difference within ±1 mm (TG224) for all the ranges.
