An investigation of neurological and/or biomechanical factors underpinning the effect of a thrust manipulation on chronic ankle symptoms: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a commonly occurring musculoskeletal injury potentially resulting in persistent pain and/or altered motion. Thrust manipulation may serve as an interventional strategy but limited evidence exists on the mechanism(s) by which a change to symptoms might occur. OBJECTIVE: The study sought to quantify the immediate effect of a thrust manipulation to the ankle to determine a mechanism by which change to symptoms occurred. METHODS: Eleven participants (6 m/5f, 26.09 ± 4.25 yrs) with a history of ankle sprain that occurred greater than three months ago with recurring pain and/or altered motion were recruited. Participants underwent neurophysiological testing to assess any pain alterations and instrumented gait analysis (IGA) for biomechanical assessment pre-post thrust manipulation to the ankle. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in ankle dorsiflexion (DF) (p = 0.62), plantarflexion (PF) (p = 0.23), ground reaction force (GRF), or velocity (p = 0.63) following thrust manipulation compared to baseline; however, pre- and post-data did show differences in pain pressure threshold (p = 0.046). There were no significant differences in dynamic pain measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle sprains that result in persistent pain and/or altered motion can be impacted by a thrust manipulation which appears to act through neurophysiological mechanisms.

Modulation of Motor Evoked Potentials via the Cutaneous Silent Period within Proximal-Distal Muscles in the Upper-Limb.

A single pulse of high intensity electrical current delivered to the digits of the hand during voluntary contractions produces a period of decreased electromyographic (EMG) activity, known as a cutaneous silent period (CSP) (Caccia and Violini, 1973; Inghilleri et al., 1997; Uncini et al., 1991). Pairing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with digit stimulation results in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with reduced amplitudes in a thenar muscle (Kofler, 2008). It is not known if similar behavior can be observed in more proximal upper-limb muscles. The current study investigated the CSP on several muscles throughout the upper-limb. Fourteen subjects performed isometric contractions with the following muscles: abductor pollicis brevis (APB), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), extensor carpi radialis (ECR), biceps brachii (BIC), triceps brachii (TRI), anterior deltoid (AD), and posterior deltoid (PD). During the isometric contractions, subjects experienced three different stimulation conditions: electrical stimulation (10x perceptual threshold) of digit II only (CSP), transcranial magnetic stimulation only (TMS), and a pairing of digit II stimulation and TMS (TMS+). The TMS evoked MEP was significantly greater than the TMS+ MEP for APB (p < 0.001), FCR (p = 0.006), and BIC (p < 0.049) muscles. The opposite relationship was seen within the PD (p < 0.047) muscle. An ANOVA test of normalized MEP values (TMS+/TMS) showed significant differences in APB vs TRI (p = 0.004) and PD (p = 0.003), and in FCR vs TRI (p = 0.046) and PD (p = 0.037) muscles. The results suggest that the CSP modulates descending drive differentially across upper-limb muscles.

Differential processing of nociceptive input within upper limb muscles.

The cutaneous silent period is an inhibitory evoked response that demonstrates a wide variety of responses in muscles of the human upper limb. Classically, the cutaneous silent period results in a characteristic muscle pattern of extensor inhibition and flexor facilitation within the upper limb, in the presence of nociceptive input. The aims of the current study were: 1) to primarily investigate the presence and characteristics of the cutaneous silent period response across multiple extensor and flexor muscles of the upper limb, and 2) to secondarily investigate the influence of stimulation site on this nociceptive reflex response. It was hypothesized that the cutaneous silent period would be present in all muscles, regardless of role (flexion/extension) or the stimulation site. Twenty-two healthy, university-age adults (14 males; 8 females; 23 ± 5 yrs) participated in the study. Testing consisted of three different stimulation sites (Digit II, V, and II+III nociceptive stimulation) during a low intensity, sustained muscle contraction, in which, 7 upper limb muscles were monitored via surface EMG recording electrodes. Distal muscles of the upper limb presented with the earliest reflex onset times, longest reflex duration, and lowest level of EMG suppression when compared to the more proximal muscles, regardless of extensor/flexor role. Additionally, the greatest overall inhibitory influence was expressed within the distal muscles. In conclusion, the present study provides a new level of refinement within the current understanding of the spinal organization associated with nociceptive input processing and the associated motor control of the upper limb. Subsequently, these results have further implications on the impact of nociception on supraspinal processing.

Methodological Considerations for the Temporal Summation of Second Pain.

Temporal summation of second pain (TSSP) is a psychophysical indication of a central pain encoding mechanism, potentially enhanced in pathological pain conditions. Low-frequency repetitive stimulation of unmyelinated (C) nociceptors results in a progressive increase of pain intensity when thermal stimulation intensity remains constant. However, when using different methods of nociceptive delivery to the skin, regularity as well as rate of pain enhancement with repetition varies between experiments. Specifically, repetitive ramping up and down from a neutral to a painful temperature has produced weak and inconsistent pain summation. In contrast, repetitive contact of the skin with a preheated probe has generated substantial pain summation. In the present study, TSSP by the intermittent contact with a preheated thermode and constant contact, ramp and hold methods were compared during 10 iterations of stimulation of glabrous skin of the hand or hairy forearm skin, with an onset to onset interval of 3.3 seconds and stimulus interval of .8 seconds. Significantly greater TSSP was observed for intermittent contact stimulation at both sites (P < .001). Differential activation of myelinated and unmyelinated nociceptors by ramping and tapping may account for different rates of temporal summation of heat pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents direct evidence suggesting the constant contact, ramp and hold stimulus may underestimate the level of TSSP. This evidence suggests the re-evaluation of stimulation techniques used for temporal summation tests, especially within clinical models.

Testing Assumptions in Human Pain Models: Psychophysical Differences Between First and Second Pain.

Acute pain arises from activation of myelinated (A delta) and unmyelinated (C) nociceptive afferents, leading to first (A-fiber) or second (C-fiber) pain sensations. The current study sought to investigate first and second pain within glabrous and hairy skin sites in human upper limbs. Fifty healthy adults (25 male/25 female, 18-30 years old, mean = 20.5 ± 1.4 years) participated in a psychophysical study investigating electronically rated, thermal first and second pain sensations within the glabrous skin at the palm and hairy skin of the forearm. Repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that the threshold for first pain was lower (more sensitive) than for second pain (P = .004), for glabrous as well as hairy skin, and thresholds at glabrous skin were higher than for hairy skin (P = .001). Hairy skin presented a steeper slope for testing, whereas there were no differences in slope between first and second pain. The study findings support assumptions associated with mechanistic differences between first and second pain sensations, while offering a novel method for producing first and second pain with the same thermal stimulus. Efforts to understand abnormalities among people with clinical pain and development of new therapeutic agents will benefit from specific psychophysical methods. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a novel method for directly comparing first and second pain within the same thermal stimulus. The ability to directly compare first and second pain sensations can aid in understanding pain abnormalities in clinical pain and development of therapeutic aids.

Modulation of the Cutaneous Silent Period in the Upper-Limb with Whole-Body Instability.

The silent period induced by cutaneous electrical stimulation of the digits has been shown to be task-dependent, at least in the grasping muscles of the hand. However, it is unknown if the cutaneous silent period is adaptable throughout muscles of the entire upper limb, in particular when the task requirements are substantially altered. The purpose of the present study was to examine the characteristics of the cutaneous silent period in several upper limb muscles when introducing increased whole-body instability. The cutaneous silent period was evoked in 10 healthy individuals with electrical stimulation of digit II of the right hand when the subjects were seated, standing, or standing on a wobble board while maintaining a background elbow extension contraction with the triceps brachii of ~5% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) strength. The first excitatory response (E1), first inhibitory response (CSP), and second excitatory response (E2) were quantified as the percent change from baseline and by their individual durations. The results showed that the level of CSP suppression was lessened (47.7 ± 7.7% to 33.8 ± 13.2% of baseline, p = 0.019) and the duration of the CSP inhibition decreased (p = 0.021) in the triceps brachii when comparing the seated and wobble board tasks. For the wobble board task the amount of cutaneous afferent inhibition of EMG activity in the triceps brachii decreased; which is proposed to be due to differential weighting of cutaneous feedback relative to the corticospinal drive, most likely due to presynaptic inhibition, to meet the demands of the unstable task.