Management of cancer of the opposite breast following breast preservation.

Breast preservation has been shown to be a good alternative to mastectomy in selected patients with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of cancer developing in the opposite breast to determine if breast preservation should be attempted in that breast as well. From 1979 to 1988, 172 women underwent tylectomy, axillary dissection and irradiation for carcinoma of the breast. All had follow-up mammogram. Mean age was 55 years. Mean follow-up time was 50 months. Thirteen patients (7.6%) developed cancer in the opposite breast. Three cancers were carcinoma in situ, nine were stage I, and one was stage IIa. Nine of 13 patients had breast preservation therapy, and four had mastectomies. Ten patients are alive with no evidence of disease, two are alive with disease and one died with disease. Breast preservation for bilateral breast cancer is a safe alternative if patients can be followed closely.

The significance of mammographic findings after breast-conserving therapy for carcinoma of the breast.

Mammographic changes after lumpectomy, axillary dissection and irradiation are common and unpredictable. To study the significance of these changes at the first follow-up mammogram, we retrospectively reviewed reports of 172 women treated in this manner between 1979 and 1988. The mean follow-up time was 50 months. Eight patients had recurrences in the same breast, while 13 patients had carcinoma develop in the opposite breast. The mean time of follow-up mammograms was 11 months (range of one to 48 months). Twenty-six patients had a normal mammogram, while 146 patients had some changes within the irradiated breast. Thirty-one patients had suspicious findings--a mass, speculation or new microcalcifications. None of these 31 patients had carcinoma confirmed by biopsy or follow-up examination. Of eight patients with recurrence in the same breast, six had a biopsy because of findings on physical examination, while two had changes from previous mammograms. The mean time to recurrence was 50 months (range of 24 to 81 months). We conclude that mammographic changes in the irradiated breast are common after lumpectomy and irradiation for carcinoma of the breast. A baseline mammogram should be done six months after irradiation is completed. Changes that occur at this time should be considered secondary to surgical treatment and irradiation and are not an indication for immediate biopsy. These findings should be reconfirmed by a mammogram performed one year after irradiation to prove that these changes are stable. Physical examination and yearly mammography of both breasts are imperative in the follow-up evaluation of patients treated in this manner.

Usefulness of performing colonoscopy one year after endoscopic polypectomy.

This retrospective study defines a population with neoplastic colonic polyps who have had colonoscopic polypectomy and, in follow-up within one year, a repeat colonoscopic evaluation. The population was broken down into two groups, one group that had polyps at the second examination and one group that did not. This study determined which factor(s) were significant among this population in distinguishing whether new polyps would be found at one year follow-up. The authors found that among the many variables studied, only polyp multiplicity was significant in predicting polyp recurrence. More than one polyp found at index colonoscopy led to a significant chance of having a new polyp after only one year. Also, it was demonstrated that these "new" polyps were unlikely to have been "missed" polyps from the initial colonoscopy. Because of the shifting location, smaller size, and fewer instances of histologic atypia in these polyps compared with those at index examination, the authors believe that polyps found after one year may be assumed to have arisen de novo. Finally, the authors show that a significant number of polyps occur beyond the reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope (approximately 60 cm). The authors recommend that patients who have polyps undergo a colonoscopic examination. When patients are re-evaluated after having colonoscopic neoplastic polypectomy, they should undergo repeat colonoscopy.