A new objective method for determining exercise gas exchange thresholds by respiratory frequency in middle-aged men.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between the two Gas Exchange Thresholds (GETs = GET1 and GET2), identified by the conventional V-Slope method, and two Respiratory Frequency Thresholds (fRTs = fRT1 and fRT2) obtained from a novel, low-cost, and simple method of breakpoint determination. METHODS: Fifty middle-aged males (age: 50-58 years; V ˙ o2peak: 37.5 ± 8.6 mL·Kg-1·min-1), either healthy or with chronic illnesses, underwent an incremental cycle exercise test to determine maximal oxygen uptake ( V ˙ o2max/ V ˙ o2peak), GETs and fRTs. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences [P > 0.05; ES: 0.17 to 0.32, small] between absolute and relative (56-60% V ˙ o2peak) oxygen uptake ( V ˙ o2) values at GET1 with those obtained at fRT1, nor between V ˙ o2 values at GET2 with those at fRT2 (76-78% V ˙ o2peak). Heart rate (HR) at fRT1, and V ˙ o2 and HR at fRT2 showed very large correlations (r = 0.75-0.82; P < 0.001) and acceptable precision (SEE < 7-9%) in determination of their corresponding values at GET1 and GET2. The precision in the estimation of V ˙ o2 at GET1 from fRT1 was moderate (SEE = 15%), while those of power output at GET1 (SEE = 23%) and GET2 (SEE = 12%) from their corresponding fRTs values were very poor to moderate. CONCLUSION: HR at fRT1 and V ˙ o2 and HR at fRT2, determined using a new objective and portable approach, may potentially serve as viable predictors of their respective GETs. This method may offer a simplified, cost-effective, and field-based approach for determining exercise threshold intensities during graded exercise.

Gas analyzer's drift leads to systematic error in maximal oxygen uptake and maximal respiratory exchange ratio determination.

The aim was to examine the drift in the measurements of fractional concentration of oxygen (FO2) and carbon dioxide (FCO2) of a Nafion-using metabolic cart during incremental maximal exercise in 18 young and 12 elderly males, and to propose a way in which the drift can be corrected. The drift was verified by comparing the pre-test calibration values with the immediate post-test verification values of the calibration gases. The system demonstrated an average downscale drift (P < 0.001) in FO2 and FCO2 of -0.18% and -0.05%, respectively. Compared with measured values, corrected average maximal oxygen uptakevalues were 5-6% lower (P < 0.001) whereas corrected maximal respiratory exchange ratio values were 8-9% higher (P < 0.001). The drift was not due to an electronic instability in the analyzers because it was reverted after 20 min of recovery from the end of the exercise. The drift may be related to an incomplete removal of water vapor from the expired gas during transit through the Nafion conducting tube. These data demonstrate the importance of checking FO2 and FCO2 values by regular pre-test calibrations and post-test verifications, and also the importance of correcting a possible shift immediately after exercise.