Treatment of adynamic bone disease in a haemodialysis patient with teriparatide.

Prevalence of adynamic bone disease (ABD), characterized by low bone turnover and absence or a reduced number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, is increasing steadily over the last years. We present a dialysis patient, with recurrent bone fractures and biopsy-proven ABD, who was treated with teriparatide. Nine months after initiation of treatment, iPTH plasma levels increased to 520 pg/mL and a second bone biopsy revealed high bone turnover, normal mineralization and normal bone volume. Two years later, iPTH was 250-350 pg/dL and bone metabolism parameters within normal range. The probable utility of teriparatide in the treatment of ABD in dialysis patients is discussed.

Impact of long-term cinacalcet, ibandronate or teriparatide therapy on bone mineral density of hemodialysis patients: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient evidenced-based information is available for the treatment of osteoporosis in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: In 102 HD patients, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured twice 16 ± 3 months apart. In the second BMD measurement 66 of them had a femoral neck (FN) T-score <-2.5. Of these 66 patients, 38 consented to a bone biopsy. Depending on both the bone biopsy findings and parathyroid hormone levels, patients were assigned to treatment groups. Eleven patients with osteitis fibrosa and iPTH >300 pg/ml received cinacalcet, 11 with osteitis fibrosa and iPTH <300 pg/ml received ibandronate, 9 with adynamic bone disease received teriparatide, and 7 with mild abnormalities received no treatment. A third BMD measurement was done after an average treatment period of 13-16 months. We compared the annual percent change of FN and lumbar spine (LS) BMD before and during treatment. RESULTS: FN and LS BMD decreased significantly in the cinacalcet group, with an annual change of 3.6 and 3.4% before treatment to -4.2% (p = 0.04) and -7.7% (p = 0.02) during treatment, respectively. In the teriparatide group, FN and LS BMD increased, although not significantly, with an annual change of -5.4 and -2.6% before treatment to 2.7 and 4.9% during treatment, respectively. In both the ibandronate and the no treatment groups, BMD change rate remained negative during the whole study. CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide administration improved BMD in HD patients with adynamic bone disease, although these results did not reach statistical significance. In HD patients with osteitis fibrosa, ibandronate did not improve BMD while cinacalcet reduced BMD.

Acute kidney injury due to osmotic nephrosis following intraoperative placement of an intraperitoneal antiadhesive barrier.

In recent years, a common strategy for the prevention of postsurgical intra-abdominal adhesions has been intrasurgical placement of adhesion barriers into the peritoneal cavity. Osmotic agents, such as various polysaccharides, frequently are used as antiadhesive materials. The effects of these materials on kidney function have not yet been studied. We report a case of an individual with pre-existing chronic kidney disease who developed acute kidney injury after surgical placement of an antiadhesive barrier of macromolecular polysaccharides. A kidney biopsy, performed because of persistent kidney failure, showed tubular cell lesions compatible with osmotic nephrosis lesions. This case suggests that use of polysaccharide-containing antiadhesive barriers can induce severe kidney damage. Such barriers should be used with caution in patients with abnormal kidney function to prevent irreversible damage.

Osmotic nephrosis due to the use of anti-adhesive membrane intraperitoneally.

BACKGROUND: A common strategy for the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions post-operatively has been the application of adhesion barriers into the peritoneal cavity. Side effects of these barriers are infection, abscesses and inadequate wound healing. There is no information about such a side effect of these materials on renal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two different, commercially available polysaccharide-based anti-adhesive materials on renal function. METHODS: In 24 adult Wistar rats, an abdominal midline incision was performed, and an anti-adhesion membrane was placed in the peritoneal cavity so as to cover its whole surface. Four rats were used as the control group. In 12 rats, a membrane of macromolecular polysaccharides, weighing 40 mg/cm2, was placed intra-abdominally and in 8 rats, a hyaluronic acid-hydroacidmethylcellulose membrane weighing 0.4 mg/cm2 was placed. At 24 or 70 h, the rats were sacrificed, and we evaluated changes in serum creatinine, urea, uric acid, K and Na, and histologic examination of the kidney was performed. RESULTS: The use of the thicker macromolecular membrane was associated with a rise in serum creatinine and urea levels, vacuolization of all the tubular epithelial cells and mild interstitial infiltration. Rats in which the hyaluronic acid-hydroacidmethylcellulose membrane was used did not show any creatinine elevation, and they presented milder histologic lesions. CONCLUSION: Polysaccharide and cellulose anti-adhesive membrane cause renal damage with tubular cell vacuolization. The severity of kidney damage is relative to the quantity of the membrane material used.

MPGN secondary to Lyme disease.

Lyme disease is a multisystem disorder with protean clinical manifestations that is caused by the tick-transmitted spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Infection caused by B burgdorferi is known to induce glomerulonephritis in animals. We report a patient with acute postinfection membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis after the clinical multisystem manifestation of Lyme disease, which was confirmed serologically. Although the patient was dialysis dependent for a protracted period of 5 months, the final outcome was excellent.