ABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate whether or not intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using spermatozoa extracted from testis (TESE-ICSI) is a more effective treatment than ICSI with ejaculated spermatozoa (EJ-ICSI) for primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Methods: We reported a case of PCD in which we performed TESE-ICSI after repeated failure of EJ-ICSI. Together with data from previous case reports, we compared the fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome of TESE-ICSI and EJ-ICSI. Results: In our case, TESE-ICSI improved the morphology of spermatozoa and fertilization rate. However, the outcome was only a biochemical pregnancy. According to the analysis combined with previous reports, there was no difference in the fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome parameters between TESE-ICSI and EJ-ICSI. Conclusions: TESE-ICSI for PCD may improve the fertilization rate compared to EJ-ICSI. However, it does not necessarily improve the pregnancy outcome for a patient with primary ciliary dyskinesia.
