Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
S Afr J Surg ; 59(2): 57-61, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212572

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cleft lips and/or palates should be identified early and be operated on at specific ages according to international recommendations. In African countries, however, cleft lip and palate surgeries are often delayed. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was done to determine the distribution, specific time delays, demographics and loss to follow-up of patients with cleft lip and/or palates treated at Universitas Academic Hospital over a 10-year period. Data was obtained from outpatient files from the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department at Universitas Academic Hospital. Two hundred and three of 318 records (63.8%) had the defined variables documented. RESULTS: The median time from first presentation to specialist consultation was 1.9 months. The median ages for first presentation was 2.2 months and for specialist consultation 5.2 months. Patients mainly had isolated cleft palates (42.4%), followed by both cleft lip and palate (31%) and isolated cleft lips (24.6%). A quarter of patients (25.6%) were lost to follow-up. More than a third (36.5%) of patients were referred from the local Motheo district and 12.8% were referred from Lesotho. CONCLUSION: In our setting, patients with cleft lip and/or palate are generally diagnosed and referred late. These patients also have delayed access to specialist consultation. Often patients are only evaluated by specialists at ages whereby they should have already undergone their first surgeries. Too many patients are lost to follow-up.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cleft Lip/diagnosis , Cleft Lip/epidemiology , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/diagnosis , Cleft Palate/epidemiology , Cleft Palate/surgery , Hospitals , Humans , Infant , Retrospective Studies , South Africa/epidemiology
2.
S Afr Med J ; 103(10): 763-6, 2013 Sep 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24079631

ABSTRACT

Current South African Road Accident Fund (RAF) legislation requires a medical determination of the seriousness of injuries sustained in motor vehicle accidents to determine whether the claimant is entitled to a claim for general damages. Such medical assessments are submitted in the form of RAF 4 Serious Injury Assessment Reports. Contested claims for serious injury are referred to the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) Appeal Tribunals for final determination. The legislation prescribes 2 instruments, namely the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides (6th edition) and the Narrative Test for this purpose. Whereas the AMA Guides are published in a comprehensive book, and training courses are provided in their use, existing legislation does not provide any indication of the required structure, content or criteria of a Narrative Test report. This document is published by the HPCSA Appeal Tribunals as a guideline to the performance of the Narrative Test; what it is, reasons for applying it and who should compile it, as well as the required structure, content and criteria thereof. A Narrative Test Report should include relevant and meaningful comment in relation to each of the 6 sections described in the article. 


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Guidelines as Topic , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , South Africa/epidemiology , Trauma Severity Indices , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...