Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurophysiol ; 86(2): 676-91, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11495942

ABSTRACT

Neurons in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus respond to visual targets and/or discharge immediately before and during saccades. These visual and motor responses have generally been considered independent, with the visual response dependent on the nature of the stimulus, and the saccade-related activity related to the attributes of the saccade, but not to how the saccade was elicited. In these experiments we asked whether saccade-related discharge in the superior colliculus depended on whether the saccade was directed to a visual target. We recorded extracellular activity of neurons in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus of three rhesus monkeys during saccades in tasks in which we varied the presence or absence of a visual target and the temporal delays between the appearance and disappearance of a target and saccade initiation. Across our sample of neurons (n = 64), discharge was highest when a saccade was made to a still-present visual target, regardless of whether the target had recently appeared or had been present for several hundred milliseconds. Discharge was intermediate when the target had recently disappeared and lowest when the target had never appeared during that trial. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that saccade-related discharge decreases as the time between the target disappearance and saccade initiation increases. Saccade velocity was also higher for saccades to visual targets, and correlated on a trial-by-trial basis with perisaccadic discharge for many neurons. However, discharge of many neurons was dependent on task but independent of saccade velocity, and across our sample of neurons, saccade velocity was higher for saccades made immediately after target appearance than would be predicted by discharge level. A tighter relationship was found between saccade precision and perisaccadic discharge. These findings suggest that just as the purpose of the saccadic system in primates is to drive the fovea to a visual target, presaccadic motor activity in the superior colliculus is most intense when such a target is actually present. This enhanced activity may, itself, contribute to the enhanced performance of the saccade system when the saccade is made to a real visual target.


Subject(s)
Saccades/physiology , Superior Colliculi/physiology , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Electrophysiology , Macaca mulatta , Memory/physiology , Photic Stimulation , Reaction Time/physiology
2.
J Neurophysiol ; 80(3): 1407-26, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9744949

ABSTRACT

To help understand how complex visual stimuli are processed into short-latency saccade motor programs, the activity of visuomotor neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus was recorded while two monkeys made express saccades to one target and to two targets. It has been shown previously that the visual response and perimotor discharge characteristic of visuomotor neurons temporally coalesce into a single burst of discharge for express saccades. Here we seek to determine whether the distributed visual response to two targets spatially coalesces into a command appropriate for the resulting saccade. Two targets were presented at identical radial eccentricities separated in direction by 45 degrees. A gap paradigm was used to elicit express saccades. Express saccades were more likely to land in between the two targets than were saccades of longer latency. The speeds of express saccades to two targets were similar to those of one target of similar vector, as were the trajectories of saccades to one and two targets. The movement fields for express saccades to two targets were more broad than those for saccades to one target for all neurons studied. For most neurons, the spatial pattern of discharge for saccades to two targets was better explained as a scaled version of the visual response to two spatially separate targets than as a scaled version of the perimotor response accompanying a saccade to a single target. Only the discharge of neurons with large movement fields could be equally well explained as a visual response to two targets or as a perimotor response for a one-target saccade. For most neurons, the spatial properties of discharge depended on the number of targets throughout the entire saccade-related burst. These results suggest that for express saccades to two targets the computation of saccade vector is not complete at the level of the superior colliculus for most neurons and an explicit process of target selection is not necessary at this level for the programming of an express saccade.


Subject(s)
Models, Neurological , Ocular Physiological Phenomena , Saccades/physiology , Superior Colliculi/physiology , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Hand Strength/physiology , Macaca fascicularis , Motor Neurons/physiology , Neurons, Afferent/physiology , Normal Distribution , Photic Stimulation , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Superior Colliculi/cytology , Visual Fields/physiology
3.
J Neurophysiol ; 76(2): 908-26, 1996 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8871208

ABSTRACT

1. We recorded visuomotor burst neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus while two monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) made short-latency saccades known as express saccades to visual targets in order to determine whether the visual discharge normally seen for these cells served as the premotor burst during express saccades. We then compared saccade-related activity during express saccades with that recorded during regular latency saccades and delayed saccades. 2. Saccade latency histograms for two monkeys during trials with a temporal gap between fixation-point offset and target onset showed a distinct peak of saccades around 70-80 ms. One monkey also showed an additional peak around 125 ms. 3. Express saccades were found on the average to have the same relationship of saccade peak velocity to saccade amplitude as regular latency saccades and delayed saccades. Express saccades tended to be somewhat more hypometric than the other classes of saccades. However, express saccades were clearly visually guided and not anticipatory responses. 4. For most cells studied (33/40), express saccades were accompanied by a single, uninterrupted burst of activity beginning 40-50 ms after target onset and continuing until sometime around the end of the saccade. For a smaller group of cells (7/40), two peaks of burst activity were seen, although the second peak was smaller and tended to occur late, after saccade onset. Across all cells, the peak of visuomotor cell activity during express saccades correlated just as well with target onset as it did with saccade onset. 5. When considered as discharge temporally aligned to the onset of the saccade, bursts accompanying express saccades tended to begin at approximately the same time as that for regular and delayed saccades. However, this discharge generally peaked earlier for express than for regular and delayed saccades. Also, the magnitude of discharge for express saccades was higher than that for delayed saccades throughout the burst. 6. When considered as discharge temporally aligned to the appearance of the target, bursts began earlier for express and regular saccade trials than for delayed saccade trials. Peak discharge tended to be greater for express saccades than for the other classes of saccades. 7. The results of this investigation are consistent with the suggestion that the visual burst of visuomotor neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus plays a role in the initiation of express saccades similar to that played by the premotor burst for saccades of longer latency. The elevated discharge for express saccades supports the idea that the superior colliculus plays a more critical role in express saccade generation than in the generation of longer-latency saccades. The elevated discharge also suggests that visuomotor bursters do not code one-to-one for saccade velocity nor for saccade dynamic motor error.


Subject(s)
Neurons/physiology , Saccades/physiology , Superior Colliculi/physiology , Animals , Electrophysiology , Fixation, Ocular/physiology , Macaca fascicularis , Photic Stimulation , Reaction Time/physiology , Superior Colliculi/cytology
4.
J Neurophysiol ; 72(6): 2754-70, 1994 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7897487

ABSTRACT

1. We recorded the spatial and temporal dynamics of saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs) found in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) in the alert, behaving monkey. These burst cells are normally the first neurons recorded during radially directed microelectrode penetrations of the SC after the electrode has left the more dorsally situated visual layers. They have spatially delimited movement fields whose centers describe the well-studied motor map of the SC. They have a rather sharp, saccade-locked burst of activity that peaks just before saccade onset and then declines steeply during the saccade. Many of these cells, when recorded during saccade trials, also have an early, transient visual response and an irregular prelude of presaccadic activity. 2. Because saccadic eye movements normally have very stereotyped durations and velocity trajectories that vary systematically with saccade size, it has been difficult in the past to establish quantitatively whether the activity of SRBNs temporally codes dynamic saccadic control signals, e.g., dynamic motor error or eye velocity, where dynamic motor error is defined as a signal proportional to the instantaneous difference between desired final eye position and the actual eye position during a saccade. It has also not been unequivocally established whether SRBNs participate in an organized spatial shift of ensemble activity in the intermediate layers of the SC during saccadic eye movements. 3. To address these issues, we studied the activity of SRBNs using an interrupted saccade paradigm. Saccades were interrupted with pulsatile electrical stimulation through a microelectrode implanted in the omnipauser region of the brain stem while recordings were made simultaneously from single SRBNs in the SC. 4. Shortly after the beginning of the stimulation (which was electronically triggered at saccade onset), the eyes decelerated rapidly and stopped completely. When the high-frequency (typically 300-400 pulses per second) stimulation was terminated (average duration 12 ms), the eye movement was reinitiated and a resumed saccade was made accurately to the location of the target. 5. When we recorded from SRBNs in the more caudal colliculus, which were active for large saccades, cell discharge was powerfully and rapidly suppressed by the stimulation (average latency = 3.8 ms). Activity in the same cells started again just before the onset of the resumed saccade and continued during this saccade even though it has a much smaller amplitude than would normally be associated with significant discharge for caudal SC cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Neurons/physiology , Saccades/physiology , Superior Colliculi/physiology , Animals , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Electric Stimulation , Electrodes, Implanted , Macaca fascicularis , Microelectrodes , Stereotaxic Techniques , Superior Colliculi/cytology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...