Life cycle based risk assessment of recycled materials in roadway construction.

This paper uses a life-cycle assessment (LCA) framework to characterize comparative environmental impacts from the use of virgin aggregate and recycled materials in roadway construction. To evaluate site-specific human toxicity potential (HTP) in a more robust manner, metals release data from a demonstration site were combined with an unsaturated contaminant transport model to predict long-term impacts to groundwater. The LCA determined that there were reduced energy and water consumption, air emissions, Pb, Hg and hazardous waste generation and non-cancer HTP when bottom ash was used in lieu of virgin crushed rock. Conversely, using bottom ash instead of virgin crushed rock increased the cancer HTP risk due to potential leachate generation by the bottom ash. At this scale of analysis, the trade-offs are clearly between the cancer HTP (higher for bottom ash) and all of the other impacts listed above (lower for bottom ash). The site-specific analysis predicted that the contaminants (Cd, Cr, Se and Ag for this study) transported from the bottom ash to the groundwater resulted in very low unsaturated zone contaminant concentrations over a 200 year period due to retardation in the vadose zone. The level of contaminants predicted to reach the groundwater after 200 years was significantly less than groundwater maximum contaminant levels (MCL) set by the US Environmental Protection Agency for drinking water. Results of the site-specific contaminant release estimates vary depending on numerous site and material specific factors. However, the combination of the LCA and the site specific analysis can provide an appropriate context for decision making. Trade-offs are inherent in making decisions about recycled versus virgin material use, and regulatory frameworks should recognize and explicitly acknowledge these trade-offs in decision processes.

Liners for waste containment constructed with class F and C fly ashes.

Hydraulic conductivity of a Class F fly ash containing residual organic carbon was evaluated in this study using laboratory and field tests. Compacted specimens of the Class F fly ash mixed with various materials (sand, Class C fly ash, and bottom ash) were prepared in the laboratory at various water contents and different compactive efforts. Hydraulic conductivity of the compacted specimens was measured using flexible-wall permeameters. A test pad was constructed to determine whether a low hydraulic conductivity liner could be constructed with Class F fly ash mixtures. Sealed double-ring infiltrometers and two-stage borehole permeameters were used to measure the field hydraulic conductivity of the test pad. Specimens were also removed from the test pad for hydraulic conductivity testing in the laboratory. Results of the study showed that mixtures of Class F and Class C fly ashes along with coarse aggregate can be compacted to hydraulic conductivities needed for landfill liners provided compaction is wet of optimum water content. The field tests showed that constructing a fly ash liner with hydraulic conductivities similar to those found in the laboratory is challenging, and requires careful attention to factors that result in cracks and permeable interlift regions that result in high field hydraulic conductivity. Leachate collected from the base of the test pad also showed that metal leaching must be considered when designing a liner with fly ash.