ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent interest in the return to sports, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, has focused on the influence of psychological factors. However, many factors contribute to this endpoint. This study aimed to investigate the ability of nonprofessional athletes to return alongside the reasons for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 101 postreconstruction patients with followup in excess of 12 months. All patients underwent hamstring autograft anterior cruciate reconstruction. The Cincinnati Sports Activity Scale was used to define activity level preinjury, postinjury, and postreconstruction. Structured questionnaires were used to identify factors in those who did not return to the same level. RESULTS: Seventy percent of patients returned to their preinjury activity score. Of the 30% of patients who failed, age, reconstruction type, and associated pathology were unrelated. However, reconstruction within 6 months of injury resulted in increased return to preinjury score (P < 0.05). Failure was associated with continued knee symptoms (57%), lifestyle changes (27%), anxiety (27%), fear (23%), and other musculoskeletal problems (10%). Considerable interplay was found between these factors. Failure to return was associated with increased further surgery, but this was successful in only one-third of patients. CONCLUSION: Psychological factors are important (and may require targeted input), but return-to-sport is multifactorial. Ongoing symptoms may prompt further surgery, but this is frequently unsuccessful in achieving return. Patient-specific goals should be sought and revisited throughout the rehabilitation program. Acknowledging psychological barriers, in those aiming to return to the same level, may help achieve this goal. In other patients, success may be return to a desired lower level. Understanding the patient's expectations is important in goal setting.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The educational alliance is argued to be at the heart of supervision in medical education. This review aims to map the research field and develop a conceptualisation of the nature of such educational alliances within postgraduate supervision for general practitioners. METHODS: An integrative review of the international literature on supervision from 2011 to 2018 was undertaken, and papers assessed for relevance and quality. Data analysis incorporated framework analysis techniques. Bordin's working alliance-based model of supervision was used as a springboard for synthesis, as well as allowing for the emergence of new ideas, theories and concepts from the literature. RESULTS: A total of 49 full texts were included for analysis. There was evidence of the importance of trust, agreement and bond in accordance with Bordin's model. The results also highlighted the importance of greater clarity on supervisory goals, and the tasks to support these goals, to effectively address competing priorities and roles within supervision. Non-hierarchical relationships were advocated, although supervisors must remain impartial in their assessment and monitoring roles. The influence of the wider practice community and situated learning through legitimate peripheral participation are documented. A model of General practice (GP) supervision is proposed that integrates the findings. CONCLUSIONS: GP supervision requires a greater emphasis than is suggested by the working alliance model, both on the clarity of expectations and the appreciation of the multiple roles and competing priorities of both trainee and supervisor. Furthermore, as GP supervision develops within the rising workload of contemporary general practice, the role of the wider community of practice may become more prominent. We have adapted the working alliance model for postgraduate General practice (GP) supervision, emphasising the explicit sharing of expectations relating to goals, tasks and roles to facilitate negotiation and agreement.
