Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 12(5): 359-65, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14512799

ABSTRACT

Reliable information about comparative cancer incidence in the Middle East has been lacking. The Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC) has formed a network of population-based registries with standardized basic data. Here the age-adjusted cancer incidences are compared for four populations: Israeli Jews, Israeli non-Jews, Jordanians and the US Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) population, for the years 1996-1997 (Israel) and 1996-1998 (other populations). The all-sites rate of cancer is approximately twice as high in Israeli Jews and SEER, compared with Israeli non-Jews and Jordanians. Rates of lung cancer are similar among Israeli Jews and non-Jews and about twice as high as in Jordanians. Childhood leukaemia rates in Jordan are higher than in Israeli Jews, but lower than SEER. Hodgkin lymphoma rates in Israeli non-Jews and Jordanians are similar to SEER, but non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates are lower than SEER. The previous suspicion of higher overall leukaemia and lymphoma rates in Jordan is thus not confirmed.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Registries/standards , SEER Program , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Israel/epidemiology , Jews , Jordan/epidemiology , Leukemia/epidemiology , Lymphoma/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 93(11): 824-42, 2001 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11390532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), collaborate to provide an annual update on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States. This year's report contains a special feature that focuses on cancers with recent increasing trends. METHODS: From 1992 through 1998, age-adjusted rates and annual percent changes are calculated for cancer incidence and underlying cause of death with the use of NCI incidence and NCHS mortality data. Joinpoint analysis, a model of joined line segments, is used to examine long-term trends for the four most common cancers and for those cancers with recent increasing trends in incidence or mortality. Statistically significant findings are based on a P value of.05 by use of a two-sided test. State-specific incidence and death rates for 1994 through 1998 are reported for major cancers. RESULTS: From 1992 through 1998, total cancer death rates declined in males and females, while cancer incidence rates declined only in males. Incidence rates in females increased slightly, largely because of breast cancer increases that occurred in some older age groups, possibly as a result of increased early detection. Female lung cancer mortality, a major cause of death in women, continued to increase but more slowly than in earlier years. In addition, the incidence or mortality rate increased in 10 other sites, accounting for about 13% of total cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Overall cancer incidence and death rates continued to decline in the United States. Future progress will require sustained improvements in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Black or African American , American Cancer Society , Black People , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasms/mortality , Registries , United States/epidemiology , White People
3.
JAMA ; 285(7): 885-92, 2001 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11180731

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Postmenopausal women aged 55 years and older have 66% of incident breast tumors and experience 77% of breast cancer mortality, but other age-related health problems may affect tumor prognosis and treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE: To document the comorbidity burden of postmenopausal breast cancer patients and evaluate its relationship with age on disease stage, treatment, and early mortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were collected on breast cancer patients' comorbidities by retrospective hospital medical records review and merged with information on patients' tumor characteristics collected from 6 regional National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries. Patients were followed up until death or for 30 months from breast cancer diagnosis. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based random sample of 1800 postmenopausal breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1992 stratified by 3 age groups: 55 to 64 years, 65 to 74 years, and 75 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Extent of disease, therapy received, comorbidity, cause of death, and survival. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent (1312 of 1800) of the sample was diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer, 10% (n = 188) with stage III and IV breast cancer, and 17% (n = 300) did not have a stage assignment. Of the 1017 patients with stage I and stage II node-negative breast cancer, 95% received therapy in agreement with the National Institutes of Health consensus statement recommendation for early-stage breast cancer. Patients in older age groups were less likely to receive therapy consistent with the consensus statement (P<.001), and women aged 70 years and older were significantly less likely to receive axillary lymph node dissection as determined by logistic regression analysis (P<.01). Diabetes, renal failure, stroke, liver disease, a previous malignant tumor, and smoking were significant in predicting early mortality in a statistical model that included age and disease stage. Breast cancer was the underlying cause of death for 135 decedents (51.3%). Heart disease (n = 45, 17.1%) and previous cancers (n = 22, 8.4%) were the next major underlying causes. In the 30-month follow-up period, 263 patients (15%) died. CONCLUSION: Patient care decisions occur in the context of breast cancer and other age-related conditions. Comorbidity in older patients may limit the ability to obtain prognostic information (ie, axillary lymph node dissection), tends to minimize treatment options (eg, breast-conserving therapy), and increases the risk of death from causes other than breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Cause of Death , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Postmenopause , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , SEER Program , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
4.
Cancer ; 89(6): 1349-58, 2000 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11002231

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blacks are less likely than whites to develop bladder cancer; although once diagnosed, blacks experience poorer survival. This study sought to examine multiple biological and behavioral factors and their influence on extent of disease. METHODS: A population-based cohort of black bladder cancer patients and a random sample of frequency-matched white bladder cancer patients, stratified by age, gender, and race were identified through cancer registry systems in metropolitan Atlanta, New Orleans, and the San Francisco/Oakland area. Patients were ages 20-79 years at bladder cancer diagnosis from 1985-1987, and had no previous cancer history. Medical records were reviewed at initial diagnosis. Of the patients selected for study, a total of 77% of patients was interviewed. Grade, stage, and other variables (including age, socioeconomic status, symptom duration, and smoking history) were recorded. Extent of disease was modeled in 497 patients with urothelial carcinoma using logistic regression. RESULTS: Extent of disease at diagnosis was significantly greater in Blacks than in Whites. Older age group, higher tumor grade, larger tumors, and presence of carcinoma in situ were related to greater extent of disease in blacks and in whites. Large disparities between blacks and whites were found for socioeconomic status and source of care. Blacks had greater symptom duration and higher grade. Black women were more likely to have invasive disease than white women; this difference was not seen among men. Blacks in unskilled occupational categories, perhaps reflecting socioeconomic factors, were at much higher risk for muscle invasion than whites. CONCLUSIONS: While specific relationships between variables were noted, an overall pattern defining black and white differences in stage did not emerge. Future studies should examine the basis upon which occupation and life style factors operate by using biochemical and molecular methods to study the genetic factors involved.


Subject(s)
Black People , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , White People , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Smoking , Socioeconomic Factors , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology
5.
Cancer ; 88(10): 2398-424, 2000 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10820364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This annual report to the nation addresses progress in cancer prevention and control in the U.S. with a special section on colorectal cancer. This report is the joint effort of the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). METHODS: Age-adjusted rates were based on cancer incidence data from the NCI and NAACCR and underlying cause of death as compiled by NCHS. Joinpoint analysis was based on NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program incidence rates and NCHS death rates for 1973-1997. The prevalence of screening examinations for colorectal cancer was obtained from the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and the NCHS's National Health Interview Survey. RESULTS: Between 1990-1997, overall cancer incidence and death rates declined. Joinpoint analyses of cancer incidence and death rates confirmed the declines described in earlier reports. The incidence trends for colorectal cancer have shown recent steep declines for whites in contrast to a leveling off of the rates for blacks. State-to-state variations occurred in colorectal cancer screening prevalence as well as incidence and death rates. CONCLUSIONS: The continuing declines in overall cancer incidence and death rates are encouraging. However, a few of the top ten incidence or mortality cancer sites continued to increase or remained level. For many cancer sites, whites had lower incidence and mortality rates than blacks but higher rates than Hispanics, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and American Indians/Alaska Natives. The variations in colorectal cancer incidence and death rates by race/ethnicity, gender, age, and geographic area may be related to differences in risk factors, demographic characteristics, screening, and medical practice. New efforts currently are underway to increase awareness of screening benefits and treatment for colorectal cancer.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Bronchial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/epidemiology , Humans , Leukemia/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/epidemiology , Male , Melanoma/epidemiology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Racial Groups , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology
6.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(3): 197-205, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10782653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some epidemiological investigations suggest that higher intake or biochemical status of vitamin E and beta-carotene might be associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We tested the effects of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene supplementation on the incidence of colorectal cancer in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 29,133 50-69-year-old male cigarette smokers. Participants were randomly assigned to receive alpha-tocopherol (50 mg), beta-carotene (20 mg), both agents, or a placebo daily for 5-8 years. Incident colorectal cancers (n = 135) were identified through the nationwide cancer registry, and 99% were histologically confirmed. Intervention effects were evaluated using survival analysis and proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer incidence was somewhat lower in the alpha-tocopherol arm compared to the no alpha-tocopherol arm, but this finding was not statistically significant (relative risk (RR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.09; log-rank test p = 0.15). Beta-carotene had no effect on colorectal cancer incidence (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.75-1.47; log-rank test p = 0.78). There was no interaction between the two substances. CONCLUSION: Our study found no evidence of a beneficial or harmful effect for beta-carotene in colorectal cancer in older male smokers, but does provide suggestive evidence that vitamin E supplementation may have had a modest preventive effect. The latter finding is in accord with previous research linking higher vitamin E status to reduced colorectal cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Dietary Supplements , Vitamin E/administration & dosage , beta Carotene/administration & dosage , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Double-Blind Method , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Smoking
7.
J Gen Intern Med ; 15(3): 155-62, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10718895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) developed a manual to guide primary care practices in structuring their office environment and routine visits so as to enhance nutrition screening, advice/referral, and follow-up for cancer prevention. The adoption of the manual's recommendations by primary care practices was evaluated by examining two strategies: physician training on how to implement the manual's recommendations versus simple mailing of the manual. This article reports on the results of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of these two strategies. DESIGN: A three-arm, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Free-standing primary care physician practices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. INTERVENTION: Each study practice was randomly assigned to one of three groups. The training group practices were invited to send one member from their practice of their choosing to a 3-hour "train-a-trainer" workshop, the manual-only-group practices were mailed the nutrition manual, and the control group practices received no intervention. For training group practices, training was provided in the four major components of the nutrition manual: how to organize the office environment to support cancer prevention nutrition-related activities; how to screen patient adherence to the NCI dietary guidelines; how to provide dietary advice/referral; and how to implement a patient follow-up system to support patients in making changes in their nutrition-related behaviors. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes of the study were derived from two evaluation instruments. The observation instrument documented the tools and procedures recommended by the nutrition manual and adopted in patient charts and the office environment. The in-person structured interview evaluated the physician and staff's self-reported nutrition-related activities reflecting the nutrition manual's recommendations. Data from these two instruments were used to construct four adherence scores corresponding to the areas: office organization, nutrition screening, nutrition advice/referral, and patient follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: The adoption of the manual's recommendations was highest among the practices in the training group as reflected by their higher adherence scores. They organized their office ( P =.005) and screened their patients regarding their eating habits ( P =.046) significantly more closely to the recommendations of the nutrition manual than practices in the manual-only group. However, despite being the highest in compliance, the training group practices were only 54.9% adherent to the manual's recommendations regarding nutrition advice/referral, and 28.5% adherent to its recommendations on office organization, 23.5% adherent to its recommendations on nutrition screening, and 14.6% adherent to its patient follow-up recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices exposed to the nutrition manual in a training session adopted more of the manual's recommendations. Specifically, practices invited to training were more likely to perform nutrition screening and to structure their office environment to be conducive to providing nutrition-related services for cancer prevention. The impact of the training was moderate and not statistically significant for nutrition advice/referral or patient follow-up, which are important in achieving long-term dietary changes in patients. The overall low adherence scores to nutrition-related activities demonstrates that there is plenty of room for improvement among the practices in the training group.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Nutrition Policy , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , New Jersey , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pennsylvania
8.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(1): 31-5, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10680727

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Surveillance of chronic diseases includes monitoring trends in age-adjusted rates in the general population. Statistics that are calculated to describe and compare trends include the annual percent change and the percent change for a specified time period. However, it is also of interest to determine the contribution specific diseases make to an overall trend in order to better understand the impact of interventions and changes in the prevalence of risk factors. The objective here is to provide a method for partitioning a linear trend in age-adjusted rates into disease-specific components. METHODS: The method presented is based on linear regression. The decreasing trend in age-adjusted cancer mortality rates for the total United States during the period 1991-96 is analyzed to illustrate the method. RESULTS: Trends in mortality for cancers of the colon/rectum, breast, lung/bronchus, and prostate are found to be responsible for 75% of the decreasing trend in cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to partition an overall trend in age-adjusted rates under the assumption that it and the trends for all mutually exclusive and exhaustive subgroups of interest are linear.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Studies , Mortality/trends , Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology
9.
Cancer Causes Control ; 11(10): 933-9, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11142528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies have suggested a protective effect of vegetables and fruits on urinary tract cancer but the possible protective nutrients are unknown. We studied the effect of alpha-tocopherol (a form of vitamin E) and beta-carotene supplementation on urinary tract cancer in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study. METHODS: A total of 29,133 male smokers aged 50-69 years from southwestern Finland were randomly assigned to receive alpha-tocopherol (50 mg), beta-carotene (20 mg), both agents, or a placebo daily for 5-8 years (median 6.1 years). Incident urothelial cancers (bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis; n = 169) and renal cell cancers (n = 102) were identified through the nationwide cancer registry. The diagnoses were centrally confirmed by review of medical records and pathology specimens. The supplementation effects were estimated using a proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Neither alpha-tocopherol nor beta-carotene affected the incidence of urothelial cancer, relative risk 1.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8-1.5) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.7-1.3), respectively, or the incidence of renal cell cancer, relative risk 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.6) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.6-1.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: Long-term supplementation with alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene has no preventive effect on urinary tract cancers in middle-aged male smokers.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Urologic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vitamin E/pharmacology , beta Carotene/pharmacology , Aged , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Smoking/adverse effects , Urologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Urologic Neoplasms/mortality , Vitamin E/administration & dosage , beta Carotene/administration & dosage
11.
Cancer ; 86(1): 37-42, 1999 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10391561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dietary components may be both causal and protective in cases of pancreatic carcinoma, but the preventive potential of single constituents has not been evaluated. The authors report the effects of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene supplementations on the rates of incidence of and mortality from pancreatic carcinoma in a randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: The 29,133 participants in the Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study were male smokers who were ages 50-69 years at the time they were randomized into 1 of the following 4 intervention groups: dl-alpha-tocopherol (AT; 50 mg/day), beta-carotene (BC; 20 mg/day), both AT and BC, and placebo. The daily supplementation lasted for 5-8 years. Incident cancers were identified through the national Finnish Cancer Registry and death certificates of the Statistics Finland. Results were analyzed by supplementation with Cox regression models. RESULTS: Effects of both supplementations were statistically nonsignificant. The rate of incidence of pancreatic carcinoma was 25% lower for the men who received beta-carotene supplements (n = 38) compared with the rate for those who did not receive beta-carotene (n = 51) (95% CI, -51% to 14%). Supplementation with alpha-tocopherol (n = 51) increased the rate of incidence by 34% (95% CI, -12% to 105%) compared with the rate for those who did not receive alpha-tocopherol. Mortality from pancreatic carcinoma during the follow-up, adjusted for stage and anatomic location of the tumor, was 19% (95% CI, -47% to 26%) lower among those who received beta-carotene and 11% (95% CI, -28% to 72%) higher among those who received alpha-tocopherol as compared with those who did not receive supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with beta-carotene or alpha-tocopherol does not have a statistically significant effect on the rate of incidence of pancreatic carcinoma or the rate of mortality caused by this disease.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/prevention & control , Pancreatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Registries , Vitamin E/therapeutic use , beta Carotene/therapeutic use , Aged , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Carcinoma/mortality , Chemoprevention , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Smoking , Vitamin E/administration & dosage , beta Carotene/administration & dosage
12.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 91(8): 675-90, 1999 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10218505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), provide the second annual report to the nation on progress in cancer prevention and control, with a special section on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. METHODS: Age-adjusted rates (using the 1970 U.S. standard population) were based on cancer incidence data from NCI and underlying cause of death data compiled by NCHS. The prevalence of tobacco use was derived from CDC surveys. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: From 1990 through 1996, cancer incidence (-0.9% per year; P = .16) and cancer death (-0.6% per year; P = .001) rates for all sites combined decreased. Among the 10 leading cancer incidence sites, statistically significant decreases in incidence rates were seen in males for leukemia and cancers of the lung, colon/rectum, urinary bladder, and oral cavity and pharynx. Except for lung cancer, incidence rates for these cancers also declined in females. Among the 10 leading cancer mortality sites, statistically significant decreases in cancer death rates were seen for cancers of the male lung, female breast, the prostate, male pancreas, and male brain and, for both sexes, cancers of the colon/rectum and stomach. Age-specific analyses of lung cancer revealed that rates in males first declined at younger ages and then for each older age group successively over time; rates in females appeared to be in the early stages of following the same pattern, with rates decreasing for women aged 40-59 years. CONCLUSIONS: The declines in cancer incidence and death rates, particularly for lung cancer, are encouraging. However, unless recent upward trends in smoking among adolescents can be reversed, the lung cancer rates that are currently declining in the United States may rise again.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , American Cancer Society , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Small Cell/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , Humans , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/ethnology , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , Sex Distribution , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/ethnology , Smoking/mortality , Smoking Prevention , United States/epidemiology
13.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 7(10): 951-61, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9796642

ABSTRACT

An extensive body of intervention research to promote breast and cervical cancer screening has accumulated over the last three decades, but its coverage and comprehensiveness have not been assessed. We evaluated published reports of these interventions and propose a framework of critical elements for authors and researchers to use when contributing to this literature. We identified all articles describing breast and cervical cancer screening interventions published between January 1960 and May 1997 in the United States and abstracted specified critical elements in the broad areas of: (a) needs assessment; (b) intervention study design; and (c) analysis methods and study outcomes from each article using a template developed for that purpose. Fifty-eight studies met our criteria for inclusion. Thirty-eight focused exclusively on breast cancer screening, 7 promoted cervical cancer screening, and 13 were designed to promote screening for both cancers. The amount of detail reported varied among the 58 studies. All studies reported the outcome measures used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, yet only 40% of the studies reported the investigators' original hypotheses or research questions. Needs assessment data were reported in 84% of the studies. Data sources ranged from national surveys to local intervention baseline surveys. Population characteristics reported also varied, with most studies reporting age and race of the study population (78 and 71%, respectively), and fewer studies reporting income and education (53 and 38%, respectively). As the field of behavioral intervention research progressed, we found that more recent studies included and reported many of the parameters we had identified as critical. If this trend continues, it will enhance the reproducibility of studies, enable comparisons between interventions, and provide a reference point for measuring progress in this area. To facilitate this trend toward uniform reporting, we propose an evaluative framework of critical elements for authors to use when developing and reporting their research. The comprehensive assessment of literature that this article provides should be useful background to investigators planning and reporting cancer control interventions, to funding agencies choosing and guiding quality research, and to publishers to help them enhance the quality and utility of their publications.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Needs Assessment , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , United States
14.
Cancer ; 83(7): 1282-91, 1998 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9762927

ABSTRACT

Cancer-related services are consuming ever-increasing health resources; along with this trend, health care costs are rising. As health care planners, researchers, and policymakers formulate strategies to meet this challenge, they are looking to cancer registries and the health information system built around them as collectors of the most extensive information regarding cancer treatment in the U.S. Currently, there are multiple programs collecting and reporting data regarding cancer incidence, morbidity, mortality, and survival. This report profiles cancer surveillance efforts in the U.S. and describes the National Coordinating Council for Cancer Surveillance, which was organized in 1995 to facilitate a collaborative approach among the organizations involved.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , American Cancer Society , Databases, Factual , Forecasting , Humans , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , North America , Registries , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , United States
15.
Cancer ; 82(11): 2123-34, 1998 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9610691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Colon carcinoma primarily affects persons 65 years and older. Seventy-five percent of the incident tumors affect persons in this age group. Because of their advanced age, older patients already may be coping with other concomitant major physical illnesses. This article documents preexisting diseases in older colon carcinoma patients at diagnosis and evaluates the effects of their comorbidity burden on early mortality. METHODS: Prevalence of comorbid conditions was assessed by a retrospective medical records review of an age-stratified random sample of male and female patients aged 55-64 years, 65-74 years, and 75+ years (males, n=799; females, n=811). Data were collected on comorbidity by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) and merged with NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry data. RESULTS: Hypertension, high impact heart conditions, gastrointestinal problems, arthritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease emerged as the most prominent comorbid conditions in the NIA/NCI SEER Study sample. The prevalence of comorbidity in the number and type of conditions was similar for both men and women (e.g., 40% of each gender had > or = 5 comorbidities). Within 2 years of diagnosis, 28% (n=454) of the patients had died. The number of comorbid conditions was significant in predicting early mortality in a model including age, gender, and disease stage (P=0.0007). Certain comorbidities, classified as "current problem," added significantly to a basic model (e.g., heart problems, alcohol abuse, liver disease, and deep vein thrombosis). CONCLUSIONS: Although disease stage at time of diagnosis of colon carcinoma is a crucial determinant of patient outcome, comorbidity increases the complexity of cancer management and affects survival duration. Cancer control and treatment research questions should address comorbidity issues pertinent to the age group primarily afflicted with colon carcinoma (i.e., the elderly).


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate
16.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 90(6): 440-6, 1998 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9521168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have suggested that vitamin E and beta-carotene may each influence the development of prostate cancer. In the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, a controlled trial, we studied the effect of alpha-tocopherol (a form of vitamin E) and beta-carotene supplementation, separately or together, on prostate cancer in male smokers. METHODS: A total of 29133 male smokers aged 50-69 years from southwestern Finland were randomly assigned to receive alpha-tocopherol (50 mg), beta-carotene (20 mg), both agents, or placebo daily for 5-8 years (median, 6.1 years). The supplementation effects were estimated by a proportional hazards model, and two-sided P values were calculated. RESULTS: We found 246 new cases of and 62 deaths from prostate cancer during the follow-up period. A 32% decrease (95% confidence interval [CI] = -47% to -12%) in the incidence of prostate cancer was observed among the subjects receiving alpha-tocopherol (n = 14564) compared with those not receiving it (n = 14569). The reduction was evident in clinical prostate cancer but not in latent cancer. Mortality from prostate cancer was 41% lower (95% CI = -65% to -1%) among men receiving alpha-tocopherol. Among subjects receiving beta-carotene (n = 14560), prostate cancer incidence was 23% higher (95% CI = -4%-59%) and mortality was 15% higher (95% CI = -30%-89%) compared with those not receiving it (n = 14573). Neither agent had any effect on the time interval between diagnosis and death. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term supplementation with alpha-tocopherol substantially reduced prostate cancer incidence and mortality in male smokers. Other controlled trials are required to confirm the findings.


Subject(s)
Anticarcinogenic Agents/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vitamin E/therapeutic use , beta Carotene/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Treatment Outcome
17.
Cancer ; 82(6): 1197-207, 1998 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9506368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) agreed to produce together an annual "Report Card" to the nation on progress related to cancer prevention and control in the U.S. METHODS: This report provides average annual percent changes in incidence and mortality during 1973-1990 and 1990-1995, plus age-adjusted cancer incidence and death rates for whites, blacks, Asians and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics. Information on newly diagnosed cancer cases is based on data collected by NCI, and information on cancer deaths is based on underlying causes of death as reported to NCHS. RESULTS: For all sites combined, cancer incidence rates decreased on average 0.7% per year during 1990-1995 (P > 0.05), in contrast to an increasing trend in earlier years. Among the ten leading cancer incidence sites, a similar reversal in trends was apparent for the cancers of the lung, prostate, colon/rectum, urinary bladder, and leukemia; female breast cancer incidence rates increased significantly during 1973-1990 but were level during 1990-1995. Cancer death rates for all sites combined decreased on average 0.5% per year during 1990-1995 (P < 0.05) after significantly increasing 0.4% per year during 1973-1990. Death rates for the four major cancers (lung, female breast, prostate, and colon/rectum) decreased significantly during 1990-1995. CONCLUSIONS: These apparent successes are encouraging and signal the need to maximize cancer control efforts in the future so that even greater in-roads in reducing the cancer burden in the population are achieved.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Studies , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Racial Groups , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
19.
Cancer ; 80(1): 80-90, 1997 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9210712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A disparity in breast carcinoma survival between African-American and white women has been noted over the past several decades. A major factor implicated in this disparity is stage of disease at diagnosis. In this study, survival and related endpoints were examined among African-American women and white women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma who participated in two randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). METHODS: Patients from two studies, one conducted among patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors and the other among patients with ER positive tumors, were included. Study goals were to determine whether African-Americans and whites had comparable outcomes, accounting for ER status and differences in patient characteristics at diagnosis, and to determine whether treatment response was similar for African-Americans and whites. RESULTS: Five-year survival rates were 83% for African-Americans and 85% for whites among ER negative patients, and 93% for African-Americans and 92% for whites among ER positive patients. Rates of disease free survival (DFS) (i.e., time to disease recurrence, second primary cancer, or death) were 71% for African-Americans and 74% for whites at 5 years among ER negative patients, and 81% for African-Americans and 80% for whites among ER positive patients. African-Americans tended to have less favorable baseline prognostic characteristics. Adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates indicated similar prognosis for African-Americans compared with whites for mortality (African-American/white RR = 1.02 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.56 among ER negative patients; RR = 1.14 with 95% CI, 0.84-1.54 among ER positive patients) and DFS (RR = 0.98 with 95% CI, 0.70-1.37 for ER negative patients; RR = 0.96 with 95% CI, 0.75-1.22 for ER positive patients). Estimated percent reductions in DFS events for patients receiving adjuvant therapy were 32% for ER negative African-Americans, 36% for ER negative whites, 20% for ER positive African-Americans, and 39% for ER positive whites. CONCLUSIONS: African-American and white patients with localized breast carcinoma had similar outcomes and benefited equally from systemic therapy. These results suggest that early detection and appropriate therapy among African-American patients could result in a reduction in the current disparity in breast carcinoma mortality between African-Americans and whites.


Subject(s)
Black People , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , White People , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen , Survival Rate
20.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 13(2): 133-8, 1997 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9084994

ABSTRACT

We validated diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death from coronary heart disease (CHD) found in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register and the Register of Causes of Death from a sample of the 29,133 men participating in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. The cases were traced to hospitals and institutes performing medico-legal death cause examinations and all relevant information was collected. The cardiac events were re-evaluated according to the diagnostic criteria of the Finnish contribution to the WHO MONICA project, i.e. the FINMONICA criteria. Altogether 408 cases of non-fatal AMI (n = 217) and death from CHD (n = 191) were reviewed. In the re-evaluation 94% of them (95% confidence interval 92-96%) were diagnosed as either definite (57%) or possible (37%) AMI. Non-fatal cases were more often classified definite AMI in the review, whereas fatal cases were more often classified possible AMI. Age or trial supplementation group did not affect classification, and no secular trend was observed. In conclusion, the diagnoses of AMI and death from CHD in the registers were highly predictive of a true major coronary event defined by strict criteria, thus their use in endpoint assessment in epidemiological studies and clinical trials is justified.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Registries/standards , Age Factors , Aged , Cause of Death/trends , Confidence Intervals , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/mortality , Finland/epidemiology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medical Records/standards , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sampling Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...