Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 32(3): 395-403, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34050819

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Severe upper limb injuries can result in devastating consequences to functional and psychological well-being. Primary objectives of this review were to evaluate indications for amputation versus limb salvage in upper limb major trauma and whether any existing scoring systems can aid in decision-making. Secondary objectives were to assess the functional and psychological outcomes from amputation versus limb salvage. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was conducted on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 6113 patients. 141 underwent primary amputation and 5972 limb salvage. General indications for amputation included at least two of the following: uncontrollable haemodynamic instability; extensive and concurrent soft tissue, bone, vascular and/or nerve injuries; prolonged limb ischaemia; and blunt arterial trauma or crush injury. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score alone does not accurately predict need for amputation, however, the Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index may be a more precise tool. Comparable patient-reported functional and psychological outcomes are seen between the two treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Decision regarding amputation versus limb salvage of the upper limb is multifactorial. Current scoring systems are predominantly based on lower limb trauma, with lack of robust evidence to guide management of the upper extremity. Further high-quality studies are required to validate scoring systems which may aid in decision-making and provide further information on the outcomes from the two treatment options.


Subject(s)
Leg Injuries , Limb Salvage , Amputation, Surgical/methods , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Leg Injuries/surgery , Limb Salvage/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Upper Extremity/surgery
2.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 43(10): 1619-1622, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34121145

ABSTRACT

A 25-year-old female presented with a chronic scapho-lunate ligament injury with development of carpal instability requiring reconstruction. During a standard dorsal longitudinal mid-line approach to the carpus, an extensor digitorum brevis manus (EDBM) muscle was found taking its origin from the dorsal wrist capsule overlying the lunate with innervation from the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). Electrical stimulation of the muscle belly demonstrated abduction of the middle finger. The EDBM is a rare anatomical variant of the extensor compartment of the wrist and may be encountered during surgical approaches. Where possible these variant muscles should be carefully dissected off underlying structures, preserved and repaired at the conclusion of a procedure to ensure no perceived functional deficit to the patient. We present a case of a previously undescribed EDBM muscle function of pure finger abduction with no extension and a surgical technique of preserving its origin. We propose that the middle finger variant of the EDBM should be re-named the extensor digitorum brevis medius to reflect our findings.


Subject(s)
Joint Instability/surgery , Ligaments, Articular/injuries , Ligaments, Articular/surgery , Muscle, Skeletal/abnormalities , Muscle, Skeletal/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Wrist Injuries/surgery , Adult , Female , Fingers , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Ligaments, Articular/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Wrist Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wrist Joint/surgery
3.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 97: 306-311, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31151003

ABSTRACT

Injuries to the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the hand are particularly disabling. However, current standards for hand protection from blunt impact are not based on quantitative measures of the likelihood of damage to the tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the probability of injury of the MCP and PIP joints of the human hand due to blunt impact. Impact testing was conducted on 21 fresh-frozen cadaveric hands. Unconstrained motion at every joint was allowed. All hands were imaged with computed tomography and dissected post-impact to quantify injury. An injury-risk curve was developed for each joint using a Weibull distribution with dorsal impact force as the predictive variable. The injury risks for PIP joints were similar, as were those for MCP joints. The risk of injury of the MCP joints from a given applied force was significantly greater than that of the PIP joints (p = 0.0006). The axial forces with a 50% injury risk for the MCP and PIP joints were 3.0 and 4.2 kN, respectively. This is the first study to have investigated the injury tolerance of the MCP and PIP joints. The proposed injury curves can be used for assessing the likelihood of tissue damage, for designing targeted protective solutions such as gloves, and for developing more biofidelic standards for assessing these solutions.


Subject(s)
Metacarpophalangeal Joint/injuries , Metacarpophalangeal Joint/physiopathology , Range of Motion, Articular , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Hand/physiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
4.
Hand Clin ; 35(1): 85-92, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30470335

ABSTRACT

The minimally invasive nature of wrist and small joint arthroscopy renders it particularly suitable for the application of the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique. The application of WALANT wrist and small joint arthroscopy has given surgeons the ability to visualize both static and dynamic movements of a joint, to show the pathology and discuss with the patient, and to visualize a patient's repaired structures. This reinforces confidence in surgeons and encourages patients to comply with postoperative rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Anesthesia, Local , Arthroscopy/methods , Hand Joints/surgery , Wrist Joint/surgery , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Patient Positioning , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage
5.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 27(7): 1178-1184, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685388

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Elbow posterolateral rotatory instability occurs after an injury to the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) in isolation or in association with an osteochondral fracture of the posterolateral margin of the capitellum (Osborne-Cotterill lesion [OCL]). The contribution to elbow stability of the posterolateral capsule, attached to this lesion, is unknown. This study quantified the displacement of the radial head on simulated posterior draw with sectioning of the posterior capsule (a simulated OCL) or LCLC. METHODS: Biomechanical testing of the elbow was performed in 8 upper limb cadavers. With the elbow 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° degrees of flexion, posterior displacement of the radius was measured at increments of a load of 5 N up to 50 N. A simulated OCL and LCLC injury was then performed. RESULTS: A simulated OCL results in significantly more displacement of the radial head compared with the intact elbow at 30° to 60° of elbow flexion. LCLC resection confers significantly more displacement. An OCL after LCLC resection does not create further displacement. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of radial head displacement is greater after a simulated OCL at 30° to 60° of flexion compared with the intact elbow with the same load but not as great as seen with sectioning of the LCLC. This study suggests that the posterior capsule attaching to the back of the capitellum is important to elbow stability and should be identified as the Osborne-Cotterill ligament. Clinical studies are required to determine the importance of these biomechanical findings.


Subject(s)
Collateral Ligaments/physiopathology , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Joint Capsule/physiopathology , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Radius/physiopathology , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Cartilage, Articular/injuries , Collateral Ligaments/injuries , Humans , Joint Capsule/injuries , Joint Instability/etiology , Middle Aged , Elbow Injuries
6.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30 Suppl 3: S27-S30, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27661424

ABSTRACT

Heterotopic ossification is the formation of bone at extraskeletal sites. The incidence of heterotopic ossification in military amputees from recent operations in Iraq and Afghanistan has been demonstrated to be as high as 65%. Heterotopic ossification poses problems to wound healing, rehabilitation, and prosthetic fitting. This article details the current evidence regarding its etiology, prevention, management, and research strategies.

7.
J R Army Med Corps ; 162(5): 330-334, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908509

ABSTRACT

The suicide bombings in London on 7 July 2005 resulted in a mass casualty situation. Over 50% of casualties were treated at the Royal London Hospital where clinicians witnessed large numbers of severely injured patients. In some casualties human biological foreign material was found embedded in the soft tissue originating from the suicide bombers or other casualties. This had the potential of placing individuals at risk of transmission of blood-borne diseases. Advances in the fields of medicine and biology have led to increased survivorship in the context of trauma and mass casualty incidents. This has resulted in the emergence of ethical scenarios surrounding patient management. A systematic review of the literature of the 7/7 bombings, and suicide bombings reported globally, where biological implantation is noted, was performed to examine the medicolegal issues arising during such attack. Twelve casualties with human tissue implanted were recorded in the 7/7 bombings. While all patients at risk were given prophylaxis based on recommendations by the Health Protection Agency, several ethical considerations surfaced as a result. In this paper, we compare the sequence of events and the management process of the victims of the 7/7 bombings and the evidence-based research regarding blood-borne infection transmission. Furthermore, it explores the ethical dilemmas, experienced by the senior author on 7/7, surrounding prophylaxis for blood-borne diseases and protocols to avoid confusion over best practice in future bombing incidents.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Chemoprevention/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Mass Casualty Incidents , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Terrorism , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Bombs , Chemoprevention/ethics , HIV Infections/transmission , Hepatitis B/transmission , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , London , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/ethics , Wounds and Injuries/virology
8.
J R Army Med Corps ; 161(4): 315-21, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25015927

ABSTRACT

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of mature lamellar bone in extraskeletal soft tissues. It was first described 1000 years ago in the healing of fractures, and in relation to military wounds, texts from the American Civil War and World War I refer to HO specifically. It continues to cause problems to injured service personnel; the consequences of wound and soft tissue complications in traumatic amputations pose particular problems to rehabilitation and prosthetic use. While HO is seen in rare genetic conditions, it is most prevalent after joint replacement surgery and trauma. In the civilian setting HO has been commonly described in patients after traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries and burns. Militarily, as a consequence of recent operations, and the characteristic injury of blast-related amputations, a renewed interest in HO has emerged due to an increased incidence seen in casualties. The heterogeneous nature of a blast related amputation makes it difficult for a single aetiological event to be identified, although it is now accepted that blast, amputation through the zone of injury, increased injury severity and associated brain injuries are significant risk factors in HO formation. The exact cellular event leading to HO has yet to be identified, and as a consequence its prevention is restricted to the use of anti-inflammatory medication and radiation, which is often contraindicated in the acute complex military casualty. A systematic review in PubMed and the Cochrane Database identified research articles related to HO to illustrate the military problem of HO and its management, current research concepts and experimental theories regarding HO. This also served as a gap analysis providing the researchers detail of any knowledge deficit in this field, in particular to the military aspects of HO; 637 out of 7891 articles initially identified that referenced HO were relevant to this review.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Occupational Diseases , Ossification, Heterotopic , Humans , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/therapy , Ossification, Heterotopic/diagnosis , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Ossification, Heterotopic/therapy
9.
Lancet ; 384(9955): 1715-9, 2014 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25441202

ABSTRACT

The principal feature of injuries from World War 1 was musculoskeletal trauma and injury to peripheral nerves as a result of damage to the upper and lower limbs caused by gunshot wounds and fragments of artillery munitions. Amputation was used as a treatment in field hospitals to save lives; limb conservation was a secondary consideration. A century later, the principal feature of injuries to soldiers in today's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is also musculoskeletal trauma and injury to the peripheral nerves caused by improvised explosive devices. Common to both types of injury is postamputation pain. We searched The Lancet's archives in this Series paper to show the efforts of surgeons in World War 1 to understand and treat postamputation pain in its own right both during and immediately after the war. Despite unprecedented patient numbers and levels of civilian medical expertise, little progress was made in providing relief from this type of pain, a grave concern to the surgeons treating these soldiers. Today postamputation pain is understood beyond a surgical context but remains a complex and poorly understood condition with few effective treatments.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/history , Military Medicine/history , Pain/history , Phantom Limb/history , World War I , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Amputation, Surgical/adverse effects , Amputation Stumps , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/etiology , Phantom Limb/diagnosis , Phantom Limb/therapy , Traumatology/history , Traumatology/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...