Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Rhinology ; : 322-334, 2022 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191585

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various nasal polyp (NP) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature. However, no single system has been identified as superior. Correlations between NP scoring systems and patient symptoms, quality of life (QOL) or olfaction vary widely. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline. Any study examining endoscopy scores and symptom, QOL or olfaction measures in cross sectional manner or after therapeutic intervention were included. RESULTS: This review identified 55 studies for a pooled meta-analysis of Lund-Kennedy (LK-NP) polyp scores (N = 6), Meltzer scores (N = 6), Nasal polyp scores (NPS; N = 19), Total polyp score (TPS; N=8) Lilholdt scores (N = 8), Olfactory cleft endoscopy score (OCES; N =4), Discharge, inflammation, polyp/edema score (DIP; N = 2), and Perioperative sinus endoscopy score (POSE; N = 2). Meta-regression assessed correlations between NP grading systems and SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT40). None of the NP grading systems correlated significantly with any symptom, QOL or olfactory metric. In intervention studies of surgery or monoclonal antibody treatment, changes in NPS scores did not correlate with any patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or olfactory outcomes. CONCLUSION: Current NP endoscopic scoring systems are not associated with PROMs such as SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, and TNSS as well as objective measures of olfaction. NP grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.

2.
Rhinology ; 2022 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35438689

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various nasal polyp (NP) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature. However, no single system has been identified as superior. Correlations between NP scoring systems and patient symptoms, quality of life (QOL) or olfaction vary widely. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline. Any study examining endoscopy scores and symptom, QOL or olfaction measures in cross sectional manner or after therapeutic intervention were included. RESULTS: This review identified 55 studies for a pooled meta-analysis of Lund-Kennedy (LK-NP) polyp scores (N = 6), Meltzer scores (N = 6), Nasal polyp scores (NPS; N = 19), Total polyp score (TPS; N=8) Lilholdt scores (N = 8), Olfactory cleft endoscopy score (OCES; N =4), Discharge, inflammation, polyp/edema score (DIP; N = 2), and Perioperative sinus endoscopy score (POSE; N = 2). Meta-regression assessed correlations between NP grading systems and SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT40). None of the NP grading systems correlated significantly with any symptom, QOL or olfactory metric. In intervention studies of surgery or monoclonal antibody treatment, changes in NPS scores did not correlate with any patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or olfactory outcomes. CONCLUSION: Current NP endoscopic scoring systems are not associated with PROMs such as SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, and TNSS as well as objective measures of olfaction. NP grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.

3.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol ; 21(4): 198-202, 1993 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8370255

ABSTRACT

Different ways of service provision frequently lead to different services being provided. In the School Dental Service (SDS) in Western Australia, all 5-15-yr-olds are eligible for care free of charge and most avail themselves of the service. The parents of some children choose to use private dentists (typically copaying about 50% of the cost) and their children do not attend the SDS. This study aimed to compare the dental status of 12-yr-olds who attended private dentists with that of matched children enrolled in the SDS. Non-enrolled 12-yr-olds in Perth (F- 0.8 mg/l) were identified and asked to provide background information and participate in clinical examinations. Each non-enrolled participant was matched with a classmate of the same sex. Of 184 non-enrolled children, 100 actually participated. Data on caries experience (DMFT and DMFS), fissure sealants and gingival health (CPITN) were collected by clinical examination. Analyses used Wilcoxon's signed rank, categorical and t-tests and simple linear regression. Caries prevalence was lower in non-enrolled children (0.31) than in enrolled (0.47). Caries experience was also lower in non-enrolled children (mean DMFT 0.71 vs. 0.95, ns). Enrolled children had more FT than non-enrolled (Wilcoxon, P = 0.059) but the mean number of DT in each group was 0.14. Enrolled children had somewhat fewer fissure sealants than non-enrolled children but in enrolled children there was an apparent (P = 0.056) inverse relationship between number of fissure sealants and DMFT scores; this was not the case in the non-enrolled group, suggesting better targeting of fissure sealants in the SDS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Dental Care/organization & administration , Dental Caries/epidemiology , Dental Health Services , Periodontal Diseases/epidemiology , School Health Services , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , DMF Index , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Incidence , Male , Oral Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Periodontal Diseases/prevention & control , Periodontal Index , Pit and Fissure Sealants/therapeutic use , Private Practice , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Western Australia/epidemiology
4.
J Immunol ; 134(1): 465-70, 1985 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3155468

ABSTRACT

We have raised an antibody to the IgG Fc receptor (FcR) of human mononuclear phagocytes by immunizing a goat with FcR purified by ligand affinity from a human monocyte line (U937). This antiserum, which inhibited the binding of IgG ligand to the receptors on U937, precipitated from detergent lysates of surface-radioiodinated U937 cells a 72 Kd sialoglycoprotein (p72) identified as the FcR by several previously published criteria. Two other bands seen in autoradiograms of SDS gels were precipitated by this antiserum: a 40 to 43 Kd band that co-purified with p72 and a 170 Kd protein that was not present in the immunogen. Fractionation of the IgG of this antiserum into two subclasses yielded one subclass (IgG1) in which anti-p72 activity was considerably enriched relative to antibody activities against other molecules. This antiserum precipitated p72 not only from U937 but from HL60 cells and from human peripheral blood monocytes as well, indicating common antigens on the p72 molecules from these three cells. However, p72 was not recovered from lysates of surface-iodinated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes or murine macrophage lines. Anti-p72 activity was not completely removed by adsorption with intact U937, suggesting that the antiserum recognizes portions of p72 that are not exteriorly disposed, perhaps noncarbohydrate portions of the molecule. We expect this antiserum to be useful for a number of studies of receptor structure and function.


Subject(s)
Monocytes/immunology , Receptors, Fc/analysis , Animals , Antibodies , Antigen-Antibody Reactions , Cell Line , Goats/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Leukemia P388/immunology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Mice , Receptors, Fc/immunology , Receptors, Fc/isolation & purification , Receptors, IgG
5.
J Dent ; 1(2): 92, 1972 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4513719
8.
J Fla Med Assoc ; 55(10): 919-22, 1968 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5725001
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5637514
12.
Dent Pract Dent Rec ; 16(8): 291-2, 1966 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5218275
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...