Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JBMR Plus ; 4(6): e10363, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32537549

ABSTRACT

Using [18F] Sodium Fuoride (NaF) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) it is not only possible to identify the ossifying potency of a flare-up, but also to identify an asymptomatic chronic stage of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic role of a more widely available imaging modality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), which is of special interest for studies in pediatric FOP patients. MRI and [18F]NaF PET/CT images at time of inclusion and subsequent follow-up CT scans of 4 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Presence, location, and intensity of edema identified by MRI were compared with activity on [18F]NaF PET. Occurrence or progression of heterotopic ossification (HO) was examined on the follow-up CT images. Thirteen different lesions in various muscle groups were identified: five lesions with only edema, five lesions with both edema and increased [18F]NaF uptake, one lesion with only increased [18F]NaF uptake, and two lesions with neither edema nor uptake of [18F]NaF. Mild edema, found in three lesions, was present at asymptomatic sites, which did not show increased [18F] NaF uptake or progression of HO on consecutive CT images. Moderate edema was found in three symptomatic lesions, with increased [18F]NaF on PET and progression of HO on CT. Severe edema was identified in four lesions. Interestingly, two of these lesions did not develop HO during follow-up; one of these two even gave obvious symptoms of a flare-up. MRI can identify whether symptoms are the result of an acute flare-up by the presence of moderate to severe edema. The occurrence of severe edema on MRI was not always related to an ossifying lesion. The additional diagnostic value of MRI requires further investigation, but MRI does not seem to fully replace the diagnostic characteristics of [18F]NaF PET/CT in FOP. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

2.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 100(1): 152-60, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24898240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations have been associated with insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. Because many non-Western immigrants in the Netherlands are vitamin D deficient, obese, and at high risk of diabetes, vitamin D supplementation may contribute to prevent diabetes and insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on insulin sensitivity and ß cell function in overweight, vitamin D-deficient, non-Western immigrants at high risk of diabetes. DESIGN: The study was a 16-wk, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 130 non-Western immigrants with prediabetes (fasting glucose concentration >5.5 mmol/L or random glucose concentration from 7.8 to 11.1 mmol/L) and vitamin D deficiency (serum 25[OH]D concentration <50 nmol/L) were randomly assigned after stratification by sex to receive either cholecalciferol (1200 IU/d) or a placebo for 16 wk. All participants received 500 mg Ca/d as calcium carbonate. The primary outcome was the difference in the area under the curve of insulin and glucose after a 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance test after 4 mo of treatment. Secondary outcomes were insulin-sensitivity variables, ß cell-function variables, and metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: Mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations increased significantly in the vitamin D compared with placebo groups. After 4 mo of therapy, the mean between-group difference was 38 nmol/L (95% CI: 32.1, 43.9 nmol/L; P < 0.001). There was no significant effect on insulin sensitivity and ß cell function. In a post hoc analysis, when patients with diabetes at baseline were excluded, a significant increase in the insulinogenic index was observed in participants who obtained a 25(OH)D concentration ≥60 nmol/L (P = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation in non-Western vitamin D-deficient immigrants with prediabetes did not improve insulin sensitivity or ß cell function or change the incidence of metabolic syndrome. However, after the exclusion of diabetic subjects, an improvement in the insulinogenic index was observed in participants who obtained a 25(OH)D concentration ≥60 nmol/L. This trial was registered at trialregister.nl as NTR1827.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Insulin Resistance , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , Vitamin D Deficiency/ethnology , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Body Mass Index , Cholecalciferol/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Emigrants and Immigrants , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Insulin/blood , Insulin-Secreting Cells/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Obesity/blood , Overweight/blood , Prediabetic State/blood , Prediabetic State/prevention & control , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...