Resorcinol 10% as a Promising Therapeutic Option for Mild Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Prospective, Randomized, Open Study.

Introduction: Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is challenging, and in Hurley stage I, it is based on topical measures. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 10% with topical clindamycin 1% and no therapy, in Hurley stage I HS. Methods: In this open, prospective, randomized trial, we studied 60 Hurley stage I patients with IHS4 ≤10. Group A was treated with topical resorcinol 10%; group B with clindamycin lotion 1%; and group C received no treatment. Patients were evaluated by total lesion count, the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Self-reported number of flares and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: A significant reduction in the mean total lesion count and DLQI scores were observed in group A, compared to group B at week 12 (p = 0.036, p < 0.001, respectively), and in the mean total lesion count, IHS4, and DLQI scores at week 24 (p = 0.034, p = 0.017, p < 0.001, respectively). Resorcinol 10% was well-tolerated with only mild AEs. Conclusion: Resorcinol 10% may represent a useful alternative for the long-term treatment of mild HS, which is superior to topical clindamycin and has a favorable safety profile.

External Validation of the IHS4-55 in a European Antibiotic-Treated Hidradenitis Suppurativa Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Previously, a new dichotomous outcome was developed, calculated as 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 (IHS4-55) score. It was validated in datasets of adalimumab and placebo-treated HS patients. External validation is an important aspect of clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to externally validate the novel dichotomous IHS4-55 in a non-biologic treated dataset of HS patients. METHODS: Data from a previously published European-wide prospective clinical study of antibiotic treatment of HS patients were used to assess the association of IHS4-55 achievement with individual reduction in inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels. Moreover, the associations between IHS4-55 positivity and achievement of the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain, and NRS Pruritus were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 283 individual patients, of which 36.4% (103/283) were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin and 63.6% (180/283) with tetracyclines for 12 weeks. Achievers of the IHS4-55 demonstrated a significant reduction the counts of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels (all p < 0.001). Additionally, IHS4-55 achievers had an odds ratio for achieving the MCID of DLQI, NRS Pain, and NRS Pruritus of 2.16 (95% CI 1.28-3.65, p < 0.01), 1.79 (95% CI 1.10-2.91, p < 0.05), and 1.95 (95% CI 1.18-3.22, p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the external validity of the novel IHS4-55 by demonstrating a significant association between IHS4-55 achievement and a reduction in inflammatory lesion counts as well as achievement of MCIDs for DLQI, NRS Pain, and NRS Pruritus in an antibiotic-treated cohort. These findings support the use of the IHS4-55 as a novel primary outcome measure in clinical trials.

Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients with Paradoxical Psoriasiform Reactions following Treatment with Adalimumab.

Introduction: Immunomodulation using TNF-α inhibitors (anti-TNF-a), especially adalimumab, is highly effective in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in cases that are poorly controlled by conventional treatments. However, paradoxical psoriasis represents a peculiar type of psoriasis that may occur de novo or as the worsening of pre-existent psoriatic lesions during treatment with adalimumab. Case Presentation: We reported 4 cases of patients suffering from HS, who developed paradoxical psoriasis after treatment with adalimumab for their HS, analyzing their clinical and epidemiological characteristics. All 4 cases were middle aged, smokers, overweight or obese. Half of the patients were males (50%). All of them were classified as Hurley stage III, with a mean duration of HS of 20 years. Two patients had a family history of psoriasis. All 4 patients had been on at least 5 months of successful treatment with adalimumab before the onset of the lesions. Conclusions: Paradoxical psoriasis emerged in 4 patients who received at least 5-month regimen of adalimumab for long-lasting HS. Although different mechanisms have been hypothesized for such events, the exact underlying pathogenetic pathway remains unclear. Consistent reporting of such rare cases, and on a larger scale, is encouraged in order to enrich the available literature.

The efficacy and tolerability of tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: Results of a prospective European cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination therapy are both considered first-line therapy in current hidradenitis suppurativa guidelines. However, evidence for their efficacy is drawn from small studies, often without validated outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the 12-week efficacy of oral tetracyclines and a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin. METHODS: A prospective, international cohort study performed between October 2018 and August 2019. RESULTS: In total, 63.6% of the included 283 patients received oral tetracyclines, and 36.4% were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System from baseline (both P < .001). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in 40.1% and 48.2% of patients, respectively (P = .26). Patient characteristics or disease severity were not associated with the attainment of HiSCR or the minimal clinically important differences for the Dermatology Life Quality Index and pain. LIMITATIONS: Cohort study. Respectively, 23.9% and 19.4% of patients had to be excluded from the HiSCR analysis for the tetracycline and combination therapy group because of a low abscess and nodule count at baseline. CONCLUSION: This study shows significant efficacy of both tetracycline treatment and clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy after 12 weeks in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the 2 treatments, regardless of disease severity.

Staphylococcus aureus Carriage Status in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Observational Cohort Study in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Athens, Greece.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, auto-inflammatory disease that affects the pilosebaceous unit in apocrine gland-bearing areas. Bacteria are thought to play a role in the development and progression of disease. In addition, antibiotics are frequently used as first-line management for HS. We sought to determine the carriage status of Staphylococcus aureus and its resistance to antibiotics among patients with HS in a tertiary referral hospital in Athens, Greece. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 68 consecutive patients attending the HS clinic of "Attikon" General University Hospital in Athens, Greece, during a 9-month period were enrolled. All patients had not received any antibiotic therapy for any reason during the previous 3 months before enrollment. Nasal and oropharyngeal samplingwere obtained, and specimens were tested for the presence of S. aureus.Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the VITEK 2 system. Standard statistical tests, descriptive statistics tests, and χ2 and Pearson correlation tests were performed, using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.The level of significance was set at a pvalue <0.05. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with HS were studied. There were 44 females (64.7%) and 24 males (35.3%). The mean age was 36.63 ± 13.0 (IQR = 21), and the mean age at onset of disease was 23.90 ± 11.53 (IQR = 14). The mean duration of disease was 12.74 ± 10.20 years (IQR = 15). Fifteen (22.1%) of the patients were Hurley stage I, 22 (32.4%) were Hurley stage II, and 31 (45.6%) were Hurley stage III. S. aureus carriage was detected in 17 patients (25%). Six of them (35.3%) had MRSA strains. There was an increased prevalence of S. aureus colonization (p = 0.058) and MRSA (p = 0.101) in Hurley stage III patients, but this result was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 25% prevalence of S. aureus colonization (17/68 patients) and a 35.3% prevalence of MRSA (6/17) among our HS patients. There was an increased prevalence of S. aureusand MRSA positivity in HS patients with Hurley stage III. Further studies are needed to clarify the possible clinical significance of S. aureus carriage in the disease development and progression as well as in the treatment outcome.

Perspectives On Perceived Stigma And Self-Stigma In Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

OBJECTIVE: To review current knowledge on how patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) experience stigmatization, as well as on its associations with clinical and psychosocial characteristics of the disease. A better understanding of these may help dermatologists improve screening and management for the benefit of HS patients. METHODS: A MEDLINE search using the terms stigmatization, perceived stigma, self-stigma, and HS/acne inversa. RESULTS: Stigmatization is common among HS patients and has a strong psychosocial impact, which is often disproportional to the extent and severity of skin involvement. Stigmatization in HS has many faces and it is more prevalent and more severe than most other skin diseases. Stigmatization of HS patients is due not only to the distressing symptoms of pain, itch malodorous discharge, and disfiguring scars but also to the lack of knowledge about HS on part of the general public. CONCLUSION: Stigma is a significant contributor to the impairment of quality of life and psychiatric co-morbidities commonly seen in patients with HS. Therefore, evaluation for stigma and formulation of strategies to prevent stigmatization and treat its consequences, in the context of a multidisciplinary approach, may ameliorate considerably the lives of HS patients.

Management of pemphigus vulgaris: challenges and solutions.

The main objective in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris is to control the disease, prevent relapses, and avoid adverse events associated with the prolonged use of steroids and immunosuppressive agents. Systemic corticosteroids remain the gold standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the first line of steroid-sparing treatment. Rituximab is extremely effective in recalcitrant pemphigus, when other treatments fail to control the disease. The European Dermatology Forum recommends tapering prednisolone by 25% every 2 weeks after the consolidation phase, and a 5 mg reduction every 4 weeks when the dose is reduced to <20 mg. If the patient relapses, options include increasing steroids back to the previous dose, adding an immunosuppressant if using steroid monotherapy, or replacing a first-line immunosuppressant by another if already on combination therapy.