ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies addressing the utility of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in predicting surgical complications have reported mixed results. In practice, many surgeons use HbA1c cutoffs to determine a patient's eligibility for elective surgery. The literature is especially limited in evaluating HbA1c as a risk factor in elective hand and upper extremity surgery. This study aims to evaluate the association of elevated HbA1c levels with the risk of postoperative complications in elective hand and upper extremity surgeries. METHODS: We performed a chart review of patients who underwent these elective operations performed by a single surgeon at a single institution. The outcomes of 930 surgeries were collected up to three months postoperatively, 334 of which had pre or postoperative HbA1c levels recorded. All 930 surgeries were evaluated for association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and complication rates using Fisher's exact test, absolute risk, odds ratio, and regression analysis. RESULTS: DM alone was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. In diabetic patients with both diagnosed DM and HbA1c > 10%, the absolute risk of complications was significantly higher. None of the other HbA1c categories (between 6.5% and 10%) were associated with significantly higher odds of complications in patients with diagnosed DM. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of elective hand and upper extremity surgery, glycemic control (measured by HbA1c) should be included as an element of the surgical preparedness algorithm, rather than an independent disqualifying factor.
ABSTRACT
Arthroscopic shoulder surgery can be performed for retrieval of bullets and retained metallic fragments in the glenohumeral and subacromial spaces. Previous case reports and case series have demonstrated the effectiveness of an arthroscopic approach over an open procedure, as it is less invasive, allows for improved inspection and documentation of the joint surfaces and periarticular structures, and potentially leads to a faster recovery. An arthroscopic approach for extracting foreign bodies from both the quadrilateral space and the posterior extra-articular space by first accessing the glenohumeral space has yet to be described. This inside-out technique may afford surgeons the potential for improved visualization and less morbidity compared with a traditional open posterior approach. We report a technique for an arthroscopic inside-out approach for removal of extra-articular foreign bodies retained in either the quadrilateral space or the posterior extra-articular space.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To compare failure rates and clinical outcomes after hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with and without allograft augmentation by a single surgeon otherwise using the same surgical technique. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis with prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes of primary hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction with and without allograft augmentation performed in a military population by a single surgeon. The primary outcome measure was graft failure, defined as graft rupture confirmed by use of magnetic resonance imaging scans and/or revision ACL reconstruction. The secondary outcome measure was the postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Results: This study included 112 patients with a mean follow-up period of 65.3 months. In patients with a graft diameter of 8 mm or greater, there was no difference in failure rates (9.4% for autograft only vs 6.3% for hybrid, P = .59). There was a higher failure rate in patients in the autograft-only group with a graft diameter of less than 8 mm (29.4%) when compared with the hybrid graft group (6.3%, P = .008). There were no hybrid grafts less than 8 mm in diameter. There were no differences in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score between groups as long as the graft diameter was 8 mm or greater. Conclusions: In patients undergoing hamstring ACL reconstruction, there was no significant difference in graft failure rates or outcome scores between autograft only and autograft with allograft augmentation as long as grafts were 8 mm or greater. High failure rates were seen when the graft diameter was less than 8 mm. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Implant failure leading to revision total joint arthroplasty can occur through a variety of different mechanisms which are typically associated with a soft tissue response adjacent to the implant that provide insight into the underlying etiology of implant failure. The objective of this study was to elucidate mechanisms of implant failure as they relate to histological classification and findings of adjacent periprosthetic tissue. METHODS: Histological analysis of soft tissue adjacent to the implant was performed in 99 patients with an average age of 64 years old and grouped into four categories based on the study conducted by Morawietz et al.:Type I (N = 47)Wear particle induced typeType II (N = 7)Infectious typeType III (N = 19)Combined type I and IIType IV (N = 26)Indeterminant typeModes of failure were categorized into five groupings based on the study conducted by Callies et al.: Instability (N = 35), Aseptic Loosening (N = 24), Hardware and/or Mechanical Failure (N = 15), Septic (N = 13), and Other failures (N = 12). We calculated odds ratios and conducted regression analysis to assess the relationship between modes of failure and histological findings as well as modes of failure and comorbidities. RESULTS: Hardware/mechanical failure was independently correlated with histological findings of anucleate protein debris, histiocytes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and synovitis. Furthermore, hardware/mechanical failure was independently correlated with osteosarcoma as a co-morbidity. Septic failure was associated with histological findings of Enterococcus, granulation tissue, and tissue necrosis as well as comorbidities of Crohn's disease, deep venous thrombosis, lung disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Infection was 5.8 times more likely to be associated with Type II histology. Aseptic loosening was associated with histologic findings of synovitis. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the existing literature on periprosthetic tissue analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty which may improve surgeon understanding of the patholophysiological mechanisms that contribute to implant failure and revision surgery.
