An assessment of the simulated performance of basic clinical procedures by junior doctors during the first year of clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Upon entering the healthcare system, junior doctors may lack the skills required to care for patients, and feel unprepared for their role, with considerable variation in the level of proficiency in the performance of particular clinical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and proficiency (self-report and observed) of the performance of nine basic clinical procedures. METHODS: Seventeen interns were observed performing nine clinical procedures in a simulated setting in June 2021 (Assessment 1) and January 2022 (Assessment 2). The observers identified whether each step in the procedure was performed correctly, and provided an overall assessment of proficiency. The participants also rated their own level proficiency. RESULTS: At Assessment 1 the number of steps performed correctly ranged from a mean of 41.9-83.5%. At Assessment 2 the number of steps performed correctly ranged from a mean of 41.9-97.8%. The most common median proficiency rating for Assessment 1 was 'close supervision', and was 'indirect supervision' at Assessment 2. There was a significant and large effect size in the improvement in performance from Assessment 1 to Assessment 2. Low correlations were found between observer and self-reported proficiency in performance of the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The large improvement in performance across the two assessments is encouraging. However, there is a need to address the variability in performance on graduation from medical school, and to ensure that any assessment of proficiency is not only reliant on self-report.

Evaluating client experience of rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: To implement a service-wide approach in the collection of data to evaluate client experience of brain injury rehabilitation.Methods: Mixed methods study. Clients with brain injury and family members of the Liverpool Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit completed a purpose-designed Patient Experiences Survey for Brain Injury Rehabilitation (PES-BIR) which included closed and free-text responses, as well as the Client Services Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). The survey was completed by clients across the inpatient, community rehabilitation, vocational rehabilitation and community-based residential services.Results: 118 questionnaires were completed in relation to 102 clients. The majority of respondents were clients (n = 79, 66.9%) with a small proportion of family members represented (n = 39, 33.1%). High levels of satisfaction were reported (CSQ-8 28.4 ± 3.8) and positive patient experience (PES-BIR total, 37.2 ± 5.5) across all services. Themes identified from the free-text responses suggested that client experience was influenced by communication with the client about their progress and within the team, tailoring of rehabilitation, access to specialist services, integration of care across the rehabilitation continuum and the rehabilitation environment.Implications for practice: Routine collection and evaluation of client experience data in brain injury rehabilitation can be used to evaluate service delivery quality and guide further service improvements.

Time use and physical activity in a specialised brain injury rehabilitation unit: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine what is the use of time and physical activity in people undertaking inpatient rehabilitation in a specialised brain injury unit. To determine participants' level of independence related to the use of time and physical activity. METHODS: Design: Cross-sectional observation study. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen people [mean (SD) age 40 (15) years] with brain injuries undertaking inpatient rehabilitation. PROCEDURE: Participants were observed every 12 minutes over 5 days (Monday to Friday from 7:30 am until 7:30 pm) using a behaviour mapping tool. OUTCOME MEASURES: Observation of location, people present, body position and activity engaged in (both therapeutic and nontherapeutic). Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were determined for each participant. RESULTS: Participants spent a large part of their time alone (34%) in sedentary positions (83%) and in their bedrooms (48%) doing non-therapeutic activities (78%). There was a positive relationship between a higher level of independence (higher FIM score) and being observed in active body positions (r=0.60; p=0.03) and participating in physically active therapeutic activities (r=0.53; p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Similar to stroke units, inpatients in a specialised brain injury unit spend large parts of the day sedentary, alone and doing non-therapeutic activities. Strategies need to be evaluated to address this problem, particularly for people with greater physical dependence.