Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 180: 103855, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257534

ABSTRACT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are rare, and the often frail patients may require potentially mutilating local treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective in melanoma and are moving towards the neoadjuvant setting. This systematic review explores data supporting the transition of ICIs from the metastatic to the (neo)adjuvant setting non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and describes how knowledge from melanoma can be utilized. ICI response rates in advanced NMSC and melanoma are comparable. Five early phase studies show effectivity of neoadjuvant ICIs in melanoma and adjuvant treatment is standard-of-care. Eight adjuvant and 12 neoadjuvant ICI studies are ongoing for NMSC. Encouragingly, data from two small neoadjuvant ICI studies in NMSC, demonstrated complete responses in approximately half of patients. In conclusion, neoadjuvant ICI treatment has potential to avert mutilating treatments in NMSC. Progress can be accelerated by learning from melanoma.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/drug therapy , Melanoma/drug therapy
2.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 247, 2022 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35247992

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Effective systemic treatments have revolutionized the management of patients with metastatic melanoma, including those with brain metastases. The extent to which these treatments influence disease trajectories close to death is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain insight into provided treatments and healthcare consumption during the last 3 months of life in patients with melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study, including consecutive patients with melanoma brain metastases diagnosed between June-2015 and June-2018, referred to the medical oncologist, and died before November-2019. Patient and tumor characteristics, anti-tumor treatments, healthcare consumption, presence of neurological symptoms, and do-not-resuscitate status were extracted from medical charts. RESULTS: 100 patients were included. A BRAF-mutation was present in 66 patients. Systemic anti-tumor therapy was given to 72% of patients during the last 3 months of life, 34% in the last month, and 6% in the last week. Patients with a BRAF-mutation more frequently received systemic treatment during the last 3 (85% vs. 47%) and last month (42% vs. 18%) of life than patients without a BRAF-mutation. Furthermore, patients receiving systemic treatment were more likely to visit the emergency room (ER, 75% vs. 36%) and be hospitalized (75% vs. 36%) than those who did not. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with melanoma brain metastases received anti-tumor treatment during the last 3 months of life. ER visits and hospitalizations occurred more often in patients on anti-tumor treatment. Further research is warranted to examine the impact of anti-tumor treatments close to death on symptom burden and care satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Melanoma/drug therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Mutation , Netherlands , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurooncol Pract ; 9(1): 50-58, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35087675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding cognitive problems in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) is limited. Such problems may include both patient-reported cognitive concerns and demonstrable cognitive impairment. Greater understanding of these outcomes is needed to inform rehabilitation strategies for these difficulties. We aimed to identify the frequency of cognitive problems and associated factors in patients with mNSCLC. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, adults with mNSCLC completed validated neuropsychological tests and self-report questionnaires measuring cognitive concerns, neurobehavioral concerns, depression, demoralization, illness intrusiveness, self-esteem, and physical symptoms. Cognitive impairment (performance based) was defined according to International Cancer and Cognition Task Force criteria. Clinically significant cognitive concerns were defined by a score ≥1.5 SD below the normative mean on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function Perceived Cognitive Impairment (FACT-Cog PCI). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors. RESULTS: Of 238 patients approached, 77 participated (median age: 62 years; range: 37-82). Brain metastases were present in 41 patients (53%), and 23 (29%) received cranial irradiation. Cognitive impairment and cognitive concerns were present in 31 (40%) and 20 patients (26%), respectively. Cognitive impairment and cognitive concerns co-occurred in 10 patients (13%), but their severity was unrelated. Cognitive impairment was associated with cranial irradiation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.89; P = .04), whereas cognitive concerns were associated with greater illness intrusiveness (OR = 1.04; P = .03) and lower self-esteem (OR = 0.86; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment and cognitive concerns are both common in patients with mNSCLC but are not necessarily related, and their risk factors differ. The association of illness intrusiveness and self-esteem with cognitive concerns can inform therapeutic interventions in this population.

4.
Cancer Med ; 10(23): 8395-8404, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34741440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel treatments make long-term survival possible for subsets of patients with melanoma brain metastases. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may aid in early detection of brain metastases and inform treatment decisions. This study aimed to determine the impact of screening MRI scans in patients with metastatic melanoma and follow-up MRI scans in patients with melanoma brain metastases. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma or melanoma brain metastases between June 2015 and January 2018. The impact of screening MRI scans was evaluated in the first 2 years after metastatic melanoma diagnosis. The impact of follow-up MRI scans was examined in the first year after brain metastases diagnosis. The number of MRI scans, scan indications, scan outcomes, and changes in treatment strategy were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients had no brain metastases at the time of the metastatic melanoma diagnosis. Twenty-eight of these patients (24%) were subsequently diagnosed with brain metastases. Screening MRI scans detected the brain metastases in 11/28 patients (39%), of which 8 were asymptomatic at diagnosis. In the 96 patients with melanoma brain metastases, treatment strategy changed after 75/168 follow-up MRI scans (45%). In patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, the number of treatment changes after follow-up MRI scans was lower when patients had been treated longer. CONCLUSION(S): Screening MRI scans aid in early detection of melanoma brain metastases, and follow-up MRI scans inform treatment strategy. In patients with brain metastases responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors, treatment changes were less frequently observed after follow-up MRI scans. These results can inform the development of brain imaging protocols for patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor sensitive tumors.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Melanoma/secondary , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Netherlands , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 60(2): 422-429.e1, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32145337

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Death anxiety is common in patients with metastatic cancer, but its relationship to brain metastases and cognitive decline is unknown. Early identification of death anxiety and its determinants allows proactive interventions to be offered to those in need. OBJECTIVES: To identify psychological, physical, and disease-related (including brain metastases and cognitive impairment) factors associated with death anxiety in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional pilot study with mNSCLC outpatients completing standardized neuropsychological tests and validated questionnaires measuring death anxiety, cognitive concerns, illness intrusiveness, depression, demoralization, self-esteem, and common cancer symptoms. We constructed a composite for objective cognitive function (mean neuropsychological tests z-scores). RESULTS: Study measures were completed by 78 patients (50% females; median age 62 years [range 37-82]). Median time since mNSCLC diagnosis was 11 months (range 0-89); 53% had brain metastases. At least moderate death anxiety was reported by 43% (n = 33). Objective cognitive impairment was present in 41% (n = 32) and perceived cognitive impairment in 27% (n = 21). Death anxiety, objective, and perceived cognitive impairment did not significantly differ between patients with and without brain metastases. In univariate analysis, death anxiety was associated with demoralization, depression, self-esteem, illness intrusiveness, common physical cancer symptoms, and perceived cognitive impairment. In multivariate analysis, demoralization (P < 0.001) and illness intrusiveness (P = 0.001) were associated with death anxiety. CONCLUSION: Death anxiety and brain metastases are common in patients with mNSCLC but not necessarily linked. The association of death anxiety with both demoralization and illness intrusiveness highlights the importance of integrated psychological and symptom management. Further research is needed on the psychological impact of brain metastases.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Stress, Psychological
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...