Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 125
Filter
1.
Oncol Lett ; 17(1): 1320-1326, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30655901

ABSTRACT

A prospective study has previously reported on the incidence of bone metastasis (BM) and skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with advanced lung cancer. The aim of the present study was to prospectively investigate how the quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced lung cancer was affected by SREs. Patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at any stage were followed up every four weeks to determine if they had developed SREs. QOL questionnaires were conducted at enrollment, at 3- and 12-months later and at 1 month after the onset of SREs, using QOL scores including the EuroQOL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and activities of daily living (ADL) scores obtained by the Barthel Index. A total of 274 patients were enrolled in the study. At enrollment the EQ-5D and Barthel Index scores were lower in patients with SREs compared with patients without SREs. A chronological analysis revealed no statistically significant changes in either QOL or ADL in any of the patients. For 14 patients in whom QOL data was collected following the onset of SREs, the evaluation undertaken on the four subscales of the FACT-G revealed a significant decline in emotional functioning following the onset of SREs.

2.
Cancer ; 124(3): 606-616, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29205286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cachexia, described as weight loss (mainly in lean body mass [LBM]) and anorexia, is common in patients with advanced cancer. This study examined the efficacy and safety of anamorelin (ONO-7643), a novel selective ghrelin receptor agonist, in Japanese cancer patients with cachexia. METHODS: This double-blind clinical trial (ONO-7643-04) enrolled 174 patients with unresectable stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cachexia in Japan. Patients were randomized to daily oral anamorelin (100 mg) or a placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from the baseline LBM (measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) over 12 weeks. The secondary endpoints were changes in appetite, body weight, quality of life, handgrip strength (HGS), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) results. RESULTS: The least squares mean change (plus or minus the standard error) in LBM from the baseline over 12 weeks was 1.38 ± 0.18 and -0.17 ± 0.17 kg in the anamorelin and placebo groups, respectively (P < .0001). Changes from the baseline in LBM, body weight, and anorexia symptoms showed significant differences between the 2 treatment groups at all time points. Anamorelin increased prealbumin at weeks 3 and 9. No changes in HGS or 6MWT were detected between the groups. Twelve weeks' treatment with anamorelin was safe and well tolerated in NSCLC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Anamorelin significantly increased LBM and improved anorexia symptoms and the nutritional state, but not motor function, in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. Because no effective treatment for cancer cachexia is currently available, anamorelin can be a beneficial treatment option. Cancer 2018;124:606-16. © 2017 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.


Subject(s)
Cachexia/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oligopeptides/therapeutic use , Aged , Body Composition/drug effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hydrazines/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Oligopeptides/adverse effects
3.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(8): 3473-80, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27003901

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although cancer cachexia is mainly characterized by persistent loss of body weight (BW), usually in response to a malignancy, the pathophysiology of cachexia remains unresolved. To elucidate the relationship between the loss of BW and other related clinical factors, we conducted a nationwide, multi-institutional, prospective, observational study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0-2 were eligible. BW, handgrip strength (HGS), quality of life (QOL), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), biochemical parameters, and survival were evaluated at baseline and every 4 weeks for 1 year. The relationship between BW loss and other factors was examined by linear regression analysis. Estimated survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and applied by the log-rank test. Clinical factors associated with cancer cachexia were identified through principal component analysis. The generalized estimating equation approach was used to analyze the deterioration of QOL resulting from the progression of cachexia. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients were analyzed. BW loss was significantly associated with worsening of QOL, HGS, KPS, and biochemical parameters. The incidence of BW loss was observed throughout the study period. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients as BW loss progressed. BW loss, decrease in HGS, anorexia, and fatigue were identified as core factors of cachexia that contributed to the deterioration of QOL. CONCLUSION: BW loss most likely deteriorated QOL and shortened survival in patients with advanced NSCLC and should be closely monitored.


Subject(s)
Cachexia/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Weight , Cachexia/etiology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Female , Humans , Japan , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(8): 3495-505, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27005463

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cancer cachexia is characterized by decreased body weight (mainly lean body mass [LBM]) and negatively impacts quality of life (QOL) and prognosis. Anamorelin (ONO-7643) is a novel selective ghrelin receptor agonist under development for treating cancer cachexia. METHODS: In this double-blind, exploratory phase 2 trial, we examined the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in Japanese patients (n = 181) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer cachexia (≥5 % weight loss within the previous 6 months). The participants were randomized into three groups and were administered 50 or 100 mg anamorelin, or placebo, orally every day for 12 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were the changes from baseline over 12 weeks in LBM and handgrip strength (HGS). Secondary endpoints included body weight, QOL, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and serum biomarkers. RESULTS: The change in LBM over 12 weeks was 0.55 and 1.15 kg in the placebo and 100-mg anamorelin groups, respectively, but the efficacy of anamorelin in HGS was not detected. The changes in body weight were -0.93, 0.54, and 1.77 kg in the placebo, 50-mg anamorelin, and 100-mg anamorelin groups, respectively. Anamorelin (100 mg) significantly improved KPS and QOL-ACD compared with placebo. Administration of anamorelin for 12 weeks was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This phase 2 study showed that 100 mg anamorelin has promising results in improving lean body mass, performance status, and especially, QOL in patients with cancer cachexia.


Subject(s)
Cachexia/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oligopeptides/therapeutic use , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hydrazines/administration & dosage , Hydrazines/pharmacology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Oligopeptides/administration & dosage , Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Prognosis
5.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 51(5): 926-32, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706626

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The sense of security scale was developed to indicate care quality within the community. Bereaved families have perspective to evaluate the quality of the care system. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to examine associations between end-of-life care and sense of security regarding regional cancer care among bereaved families. METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted with families of cancer patients who died in regional areas of Japan. RESULTS: A total of 1046 family caregivers of patients responded to surveys (effective response rate of 65%). In multiple regression analyses, the families' higher age (P < 0.001), home death (P = 0.039), better health status of the family at patients' end of life (P = 0.016), lower caregiving burden (P < 0.001), and elements of perceived good patient death, including being free from physical distress (P < 0.001), trusting the physician (P < 0.001), living in calm circumstances (P = 0.042), and feeling that one's life was fulfilling (P = 0.035), were associated with a higher sense of security. CONCLUSION: Quality of death and lower burden on family caregivers were associated with families' sense of security. This suggests strategies for improving care quality for each patient to improve the sense of security.


Subject(s)
Bereavement , Family/psychology , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Terminal Care/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Death , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/psychology , Regression Analysis , Stress, Psychological , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(1): 347-356, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076961

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Prejudices against palliative care are a potential barrier to quality end-of-life care. There have been few large-scale community-wide interventions to distribute appropriate information about palliative care, and no studies have investigated their impact on cancer patients, their families, and the general public. Thus, we conducted a 3-year community intervention and evaluated the effects of distributing such information at the community level, and explored associations among levels of exposure, perceptions, knowledge, and the sense of security achieved. METHODS: Over a period of 3 years, we provided flyers, booklets, posters, and public lectures about palliative care in four regions of Japan, and carried out pre- and post-intervention surveys with repeated cross-sectional samplings of cancer patients (pre 859, post 857), bereaved family members (1110, 1137), and the general public (3984, 1435). The levels of exposure to the provided information were measured by a multiple-choice questionnaire after intervention. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for perceptions of palliative care, knowledge about opioids, and sense of security among the exposure groups. RESULTS: Overall perceptions of palliative care, opioids, and receiving care at home improved significantly among the general public and families, but not among the patients at the community level. However, multiple regression revealed that patients of extensive exposure category had significantly more positive perceptions of palliative care to those of non-exposure category (p = 0.02). The sense of security regarding cancer care of all patients, family members, and the general public improved. Among others, the respondents who reported extensive exposure in the general public and family members scored significantly higher sense of security. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that providing palliative care information via small media and lectures in the community is effective in improving perceptions of palliative care and knowledge about opioids among the community dwellers, especially for caregivers of the patients. The acquisition of adequate knowledge about palliative care from various information sources may improve people's sense of security regarding cancer.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/methods , Information Dissemination/methods , Neoplasms/psychology , Palliative Care/psychology , Terminal Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Perception , Public Opinion , Surveys and Questionnaires , Terminal Care/psychology
7.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 21(1): 1-12, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26081252

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to disseminate the standard of antiemetic therapy for Japanese clinical oncologists. On the basis of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument, which reflects evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, a working group of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) reviewed clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis and performed a systematic review of evidence-based domestic practice guidelines for antiemetic therapy in Japan. In addition, because health-insurance systems in Japan are different from those in other countries, a consensus was reached regarding standard treatments for chemotherapy that induce nausea and vomiting. Current evidence was collected by use of MEDLINE, from materials from meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and from European Society of Medical Oncology/Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines for antiemesis. Initially, 21 clinical questions (CQ) were selected on the basis of CQs from other guidelines. Patients treated with highly emetic agents should receive a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. For patients with moderate emetic risk, 5HT3 receptor antagonists and dexamethasone were recommended, whereas for those receiving chemotherapy with low emetic risk dexamethasone only is recommended. Patients receiving high-emetic-risk radiation therapy should also receive a 5HT3 receptor antagonist. In this paper the 2010 JSCO clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis are presented in English; they reveal high concordance of Japanese medical circumstances with other antiemetic guidelines that are similarly based on evidence.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Medical Oncology , Nausea/chemically induced , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Vomiting/chemically induced , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Humans , Japan , Nausea/drug therapy , Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Societies, Medical , Time Factors , Vomiting/drug therapy
8.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 50(2): 232-40, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25847849

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Although several studies have explored the effects of regional palliative care programs, no studies have investigated the changes in physician-related outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The primary aims of this study were to: (1) clarify the changes in knowledge, difficulties, and self-reported practice of physicians before and after the intervention, (2) explore the potential associations between the level of physicians' participation in the program and outcomes, and (3) identify the reasons and characteristics of physicians who did not participate in the program. METHODS: As a part of the regional palliative care intervention trial, questionnaires were sent to physicians recruited consecutively to obtain a representative sample of each region. Physician-reported knowledge, difficulty of palliative care, and self-perceived practice were measured using the Palliative Care Knowledge Test, Palliative Care Difficulty Scale, and Palliative Care Self-Reported Practice Scale (PCPS), respectively. The level of their involvement in the program and reason for non-participation were ascertained from self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: The number of eligible physicians identified was 1870 in pre-intervention and 1763 in post-intervention surveys, and we obtained 911 and 706 responses. Total scores of the Palliative Care Knowledge Test, PCPS, and PCPS were significantly improved after the intervention, with effect sizes of 0.30, 0.52, and 0.17, respectively. Physicians who participated in workshops more frequently were significantly more likely to have better knowledge, less difficulties, and better self-reported practice. CONCLUSION: After the regional palliative care program, there were marked improvements in physicians' knowledge and difficulties. These improvements were associated with the level of physicians' participation in the program.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Palliative Care , Physicians/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Self Report
9.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 42(3): 305-11, 2015 Mar.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25812498

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Japan Society of Clinical Oncology published a guideline for anti-emetic therapy two years ago. This guideline was a first evidence based guideline of anti-emetic treatment for the patients who received chemotherapy in Japan. To investigate a current situation of anti-emetic treatment in Japan, we analyzed the data from nationwide questionnaire. MATERIAL: Questionnaire analysis; From June 2012 to August 2012, we gave 24 questionnaires on the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Website and collected the response from the member of 5 major academic oncology societies. The questionnaires included degree of recognition, penetration, usefulness, problems and user type of medial stuff for the anti-emetic guideline published by (JSCO). RESULTS: Questionnaire; 1,529 medical stuff responded to our questionnaire. 1,308 (85.5%) stuffs recognized JSCO guidelines, 586 (51%) had regard for guideline and 489 (42.6%) referred to the guideline. 899 (78.3%) changed their practice in clinic to recommended practice by the guideline. But 385 (33.5%) complained high medical cost of recommended anti-emetic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of recognition and penetration of our guideline for anti-emetic therapy were very high in Japan.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Nausea/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Vomiting/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Nausea/chemically induced , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vomiting/chemically induced
10.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 45(1): 67-74, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25381384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Rapid analgesic onset opioids, particularly fentanyl buccal tablet, is preferable for managing breakthrough pain. The efficacy and safety of fentanyl buccal tablet and its association with around-the-clock opioids needs to be explored with an option of dose adjustments, more closely reflecting administration in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of fentanyl buccal tablet in breakthrough pain management in combination with around-the-clock opioids with the dose adjustment option, and explore the dose adjustment's influence on breakthrough pain management using detailed evaluation. METHODS: The 12-week open-label, multi-center study was conducted throughout Japan. Cancer patients aged 20 years or older, experiencing persistent pain controlled with around-the-clock opioids and breakthrough pain with supplemental medications were enrolled. Fentanyl buccal tablet and around-the-clock opioid doses could be adjusted under protocol-specified conditions. Efficacy variables were assessed at each fentanyl buccal tablet administration. Safety was assessed mainly by adverse events. RESULTS: All efficacy variables showed sustained analgesic effect. Nearly half the patients stayed on the same dose; most fentanyl buccal tablet administrations did not require additional supplemental medications. Dose increase of fentanyl buccal tablet and around-the-clock opioids seemed to improve breakthrough pain intensity and frequency, respectively. Fentanyl buccal tablet and around-the-clock opioid doses were not strongly associated. Treatment-related adverse events were all common with opioid treatment and did not increase over time. CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl buccal tablet can stably and safely manage breakthrough pain in cancer patients with independent dose adjustment based on detailed evaluation of each patient's condition. Breakthrough pain management using fentanyl buccal tablet with around-the-clock opioids at optimal doses may be an important factor in palliative care for cancer patients with breakthrough pain.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Breakthrough Pain/drug therapy , Fentanyl/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/complications , Pain Management/methods , Administration, Buccal , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Asian People , Breakthrough Pain/etiology , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Tablets , Treatment Outcome
11.
Palliat Support Care ; 13(5): 1301-8, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25370595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and one of the most important issues in palliative medicine, and it has been demonstrated to have a significant impact on patient quality of life (QoL). The present pilot randomized controlled study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of methylprednisolone (MP) for CRF in advanced cancer patients. METHOD: Our study was planned as a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to an MP group, who received 32 mg/day of MP orally for 7 days, and a placebo group. The primary endpoint was an improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) score for fatigue from baseline to day 7. The secondary endpoints were improvements in appetite loss and QoL as well as evaluating the safety of corticosteroids as palliative therapy. RESULTS: It was not possible to complete patient registration. In total, 35 patients were randomly assigned to an MP group (n = 18) and a placebo group (n = 17). The mean changes in VAS score for fatigue were -9.06 in the placebo group and -1.56 in the MP group, and for appetite loss -6.44 in the placebo group and -8.06 in the MP group. In addition, there was no evidence that methylprednisolone improved appetite loss or QoL compared to placebo. The incidence of adverse effects was not greater in the MP group. Significant of Result: We conclude that our sample size was too small to prove the efficacy of methylprednisolone in improving fatigue. Our results were reported as a pilot study performed to support a subsequent larger trial.


Subject(s)
Fatigue/drug therapy , Feeding and Eating Disorders/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Quality of Life , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue/etiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/etiology , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Methylprednisolone/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 33(4): 357-63, 2015 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534381

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore the associations between place of death and quality of death and dying and caregiver burden in terminally ill patients with cancer and their families. METHODS: Two bereavement surveys were conducted in October 2008 and October 2011. A total of 2,247 family caregivers of patients with cancer who were deceased responded to the mail surveys (response rate, 67%). Family members reported patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden by using the Good Death Inventory and Caregiving Consequences Inventory. RESULTS: Patient quality of death and dying was significantly higher at home relative to other places of dying after adjustment for patient and/or family characteristics (adjusted means): 5.0 (95% CI, 4.9 to 5.2) for home, 4.6 (95% CI, 4.5 to 4.7) for palliative care units, and 4.3 (95% CI, 4.2 to 4.4) for hospitals. For all combinations, pairwise P < .001; the size of the difference between home and hospital was moderate (Hedges' g, 0.45). Home was superior to palliative care units or hospitals with respect to "dying in a favorite place," "good relationships with medical staff," "good relationships with family," and "maintaining hope and pleasure" (P < .001 for all combinations of home v palliative care units and home v hospitals). Home death was significantly associated with a lower overall (P = .03) and financial caregiver burden (P = .004) relative to hospital death. CONCLUSION: Dying at home may contribute to achieving good death in terminally ill patients with cancer without causing remarkably increased caregiver burden. Place of death should be regarded as an essential goal in end-of-life care.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Death , Caregivers/psychology , Death , Family/psychology , Terminally Ill/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Bereavement , Cost of Illness , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Female , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospice Care/economics , Hospice Care/psychology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/economics , Terminal Care/psychology
13.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 32(6): 604-10, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24907123

ABSTRACT

This study primarily aimed to identify future actions required to promote palliative care in Japan. The future actions regarded as effective by the general population were "improve physicians' skill in palliative care" (61%), "create a counseling center for cancer" (61%), and "improve nurses' skill in palliative care" (60%). In contrast, future actions regarded as effective by the health care professionals were "set up a Web site that provides information about cancer" (72%), "promote consultation with specialists in palliative care" (71%), and "open an outpatient department specializing in palliative care" (70%). The results suggest (1) development and maintenance of settings; (2) enhancement of palliative care education and training programs for health care providers; and (3) improvement in distributing information about cancer and regional palliative care resources to the general population.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asian People , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Health Communication , Humans , Information Dissemination , Male , Middle Aged
14.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 148(6): 2659-64, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25173121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although positive pleural lavage cytology (PLC) has been demonstrated to be closely associated with a poor prognosis for patients with lung cancer, it has not been incorporated into the TNM staging system of the Union for International Cancer Control. The aim of our study was to retrospectively examine the clinical significance of PLC status and illustrate the recommendations of the International Pleural Lavage Cytology Collaborators (IPLCC) in a large national database. METHODS: The Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry database included 11,073 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent resections in 2004. We extracted the clinicopathologic data for 4171 patients (37.3%) who underwent PLC. These patients were staged according to the seventh edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification and by recommendations of the IPLCC, in which T was singly upgraded up to a maximum of T4 for those who were PLC-positive. Prognoses based on these 2 systems were compared. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients (5.2%) were PLC-positive, which was significantly associated with a higher incidence of adenocarcinoma and advanced disease. The 5-year survival for patients with positive and negative PLC results were 44.5% and 72.8%, respectively, and this difference in survival was statistically significant (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that positive PLC status was an independent factor for a poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 1.57; P < .001). Significant differences in survival were also found between patients with positive and negative PLC results in the same T categories and stages, including T2a, T3, stage IB, and stage IIIA. The IPLCC recommendations adjusted the prognostic differences in all T categories and stages. The significant difference in survival disappeared between the 2 groups in all T categories and stages. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a T category upgrade is prognostically adequate for patients who are PLC-positive.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pleural Cavity/pathology , Pneumonectomy , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Japan , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Pneumonectomy/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Thorac Oncol ; 9(8): 1140-5, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25157766

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Indications for surgical resection for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have been very limited. Because early-stage SCLC is a rare presentation of lung cancer, studies comparing surgical resection among a large number of patients are unlikely to be conducted. This study reports the most recent surgical outcomes of a large number of SCLC patients who underwent surgery in 2004. METHODS: In 2010, the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry performed a nationwide retrospective registry study regarding the prognosis and clinicopathologic profiles of 11,663 patients who underwent resection for primary lung cancer in 2004. Of the 11,663 patients, 243 patients with SCLC (2.1%) were included in this study. The registry data of the patients with SCLC were analyzed, and the clinicopathologic profiles and surgical outcomes of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate for all cases (n = 243, 213 males, mean age 68.2 years) was 52.6%. The 5-year survival rates by c-stage and p-stage were as follows: IA, 64.3% (n = 132) and 72.3% (n = 93); IB, 45.7% (n = 36) and 61.1% (n = 51); IIA, 50.5% (n =25); and 44.8% (n = 27); IIB, 33.3% (n = 10) and 40.3% (n = 17); IIIA, 30.5% (n = 30) and 23.4% (n = 45); and IV, 0% (n = 7) and 0% (n = 9), respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that the significant prognostic factors were age, gender, c-stage, and surgical curability. A kappa value was moderate conformity between c-stage and p-stage in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection in selected patients with early-stage SCLC, especially stage I, had favorable results.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual , Pneumonectomy/methods , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Survival Rate
16.
J Palliat Med ; 17(8): 887-93, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25083586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the symptom burden and achievement of good death of elderly cancer patients with that of younger patients. METHODS: Secondary analysis of three large databases was performed: (1) 7449 cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy, (2) 1716 outpatients with metastatic cancer, and (3) 1751 terminally ill cancer patients who died in hospitals or at home. Outcome measures used included the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, Brief Pain Inventory, and Good Death Inventory. RESULTS: In cancer outpatients receiving chemotherapy, older patients reported significantly higher levels of dyspnea and fatigue (lung cancer), emotional distress (breast cancer), and unmet needs regarding information and help with decision making (stomach cancer); however, the intensity of nausea was significantly lower across the four primary tumor sites, and intensity of pain was significantly lower in lung cancer. In outpatients with metastatic cancer, older patients reported lower levels of "maintaining hope and pleasure," "a good relationship with the family," and "independence," while there was no significant difference in the pain intensity. In terminally ill cancer patients, proxy family members reported significantly lower levels of "independence," while they reported significantly lower levels of pain, physical discomfort, and psychological discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Older cancer patients need at least the same levels of palliative care; while they experienced generally lower levels of nausea and pain, some older patients experienced higher levels of dyspnea, fatigue, emotional distress, need for information, help with decision making, loss of hope and pleasure, and independence.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Death , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/psychology , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Terminally Ill/psychology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family/psychology , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pain Measurement , Quality of Health Care , Quality of Life , Risk Factors
17.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 44(8): 718-28, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We investigated palliative care knowledge, difficulty and self-reported practice among a region-wide sample of nurses who cared for cancer patients in Japan. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was distributed to 9 designated cancer centers, 17 community hospitals and 73 district nurse services across 4 regions in 2008. We used the Palliative Care Knowledge Test, the Palliative Care Difficulty Scale (five-point Likert scale) and the Palliative Care Self-Reported Practices Scale (five-point Likert scale). RESULTS: In total, 2378 out of 3008 nurses (79%) responded. The knowledge, difficulty and self-reported practice scores were 51 ± 20%, 3.2 ± 0.7 and 3.7 ± 0.6, respectively. In the knowledge test, philosophy scored highest (88 ± 26%) and psychiatric problems scored lowest (37 ± 29%). In the difficulty test, alleviating symptoms scored most difficult (3.5 ± 0.8) and providing expert support scored least difficult (2.9 ± 1.3). In the self-reported practice questionnaire, pain and delirium relief were most frequently (4.0 ± 0.8) and least frequently (3.1 ± 0.9) provided, respectively. Knowledge was significantly poorer in community hospitals (P = 0.035); difficulty scores were significantly higher in community hospitals (P < 0.001) and district nurse services (P = 0.013); and self-reported practice scores were significantly poorer in community hospitals (P < 0.001) but superior in district nurse services (P < 0.001) than in designated cancer centers. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge, difficulty and self-reported practice for symptom management, particularly psychological symptoms, were insufficient, particularly in community hospitals. Education, expert support and adequate clinical experiences would help provide quality palliative care.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms/therapy , Nurses/psychology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care , Self Report , Adult , Cancer Care Facilities , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delirium/nursing , Female , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Service, Hospital , Pain Management/nursing , Surveys and Questionnaires , Terminally Ill
18.
Support Care Cancer ; 22(9): 2445-55, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24705857

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Pain is still a major problem for cancer patients, and the effect of a population-based approach on patients' experience of pain is not fully understood. AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to clarify the changes in pain intensity in outpatients before and after a regional palliative care program. The secondary aim was to clarify the prevalence of patients who had unmet needs for pain treatment and to clarify the reasons for not wanting pain treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A regional palliative care program was implemented in four regions of Japan. A region-representative sample of metastatic/locally advanced cancer patients in outpatient settings took part in questionnaire surveys before and after the regional intervention. Responses were obtained from 859 from 1,880 and 857 from 2,123 in the preintervention and postintervention surveys, respectively. RESULTS: After a regional palliative care program, neither worst, average, nor least pain levels in outpatients changed significantly. A total of 134 patients (16 %) reported that they needed more pain treatment. There were various reasons for not wanting pain treatment, namely, minimum interference with daily life, general nonpreference for medicines, longstanding symptoms before the diagnosis of cancer, concerns about tolerance and addiction, and experienced neuropsychiatric symptoms under current medications. CONCLUSION: The regional palliative care program failed to demonstrate improvement of the pain intensity of cancer outpatients. One possible interpretation is that they are less likely to be regarded as target populations and that the study population experienced generally well-controlled pain. Future study including patients with more severe pain is needed, but to improve pain levels of cancer outpatients, intensive, patient-directed intervention seems to be more promising than region-based intervention.


Subject(s)
Comprehensive Health Care , Health Services Needs and Demand , Neoplasms/therapy , Pain Management , Palliative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Community Health Services/standards , Comprehensive Health Care/methods , Comprehensive Health Care/standards , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pain/etiology , Pain Management/standards , Pain Measurement , Palliative Care/standards , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
19.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 44(3): 249-56, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24407834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although confidence in providing palliative care services is an essential component of providing such care, factors relating to this have not been investigated in Japan. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore confidence in the ability to provide palliative care and associated difficulties and to explore correlations between these variables. Design A cross-sectional mail survey of medical doctors and registered nurses in Japan was performed as part of a regional intervention trial: the Outreach Palliative Care Trial of Integrated Regional Model study. Subjects Questionnaires were sent to 7905 medical professionals, and 409 hospital doctors, 235 general practitioners, 2160 hospital nurses and 115 home visiting nurses completed them. RESULTS: Confidence in providing palliative care was low and difficulties frequent for all types of medical professionals assessed. In particular, only 8-24% of them, depending on category, agreed to 'having adequate knowledge and skills regarding cancer pain management'. In particular, 55-80% of medical professionals acknowledged difficulty with 'alleviation of cancer pain'. Multiple regression analysis revealed that confidence was positively correlated with the amount of relevant experience and, for medical doctors, with 'prescriptions of opioids (per year)'. Moreover, difficulties were negatively correlated with the amount of relevant clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: Effective strategies for developing regional palliative care programs include basic education of medical professionals on management of cancer-related pain (especially regarding opioids) and other symptoms.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Health Services Accessibility , Home Care Services , Neoplasms/therapy , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management , Pain/drug therapy , Palliative Care , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Home Care Services/standards , Humans , Japan , Male , Nurses/psychology , Pain/etiology , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/standards , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/standards , Physicians/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 48(3): 364-73, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24439846

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Policymaking plays an important role in national palliative care services. The Japanese Cancer Control Act was implemented in 2006. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in the structure and processes of palliative care services after implementation of the Cancer Control Act. METHODS: We conducted annual nationwide surveys in designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs, n = 349) between 2008 and 2010. The 65-item questionnaire was divided into seven domains: institutional framework, information to patient and family, practice of palliative care, activities of the palliative care teams (PCTs), members of PCTs, regional medical cooperation, and education. Increasing trends were tested using generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: The response rates were ≥ 99%. All domains showed an increasing trend (P < 0.001). There were significant increases in full-time PCT physicians (27.4%-45.7%, P(trend) < 0.001), full-time PCT nurses (38.9%-88.0%, P(trend) < 0.001), and the median number of annual referrals to PCTs (60-80 patients, P < 0.001). Essential drugs were available in most DCCHs from baseline. Although outpatient clinics increased significantly (27.0%-58.9%, P(trend) < 0.001), community outreach programs did not (9.0%-12.6%, P = 0.05). Basic education was actively introduced for in-hospital physicians and nurses (78.2% and 91.4% in 2010), but often unavailable for regional health care providers (basic education for regional physicians and nurses: 63.9% and 71.1% in 2010). CONCLUSION: The Cancer Control Act promoted the development and enhancement of palliative care services in DCCHs. Regional medical cooperation and education are the future challenges of palliative care in Japan.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Palliative Care/methods , Education, Professional , Humans , Japan , Patient Care Team , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...