Money and place: Quantifying the types of obstacles associated with seeking an abortion after 10 weeks' gestation, 2019-2020.

OBJECTIVES: Identify factors associated with presenting for abortion after 10 weeks' gestation in a large, geographically diverse sample. STUDY DESIGN: From October 2019 to March 2020, we surveyed 1089 patients seeking abortion at seven U.S. facilities. We identified four domains of barriers: geographic, financial, logistical/personal, and legislative. Using multivariable logistic regression, we investigated the relationship between each domain and presenting for abortion after 10 weeks' gestation, overall and stratified by state policy landscape. RESULTS: One-third of participants reported geographic (33.0%), financial (33.3%), and logistical/personal (31.4%) barriers; fewer (4.8%) reported legislative barriers. One-third (30.8%) traveled over 50 miles to the clinic. One-quarter (25.2%) presented after 10 weeks' gestation. In multivariable analyses, financial barriers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-2.09), geographic barriers (aOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.44-2.90), and difficulty meeting basic expenses (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.15-1.89) were associated with presenting after 10 weeks' gestation across the seven clinics. Among participants accessing care at clinics in states with supportive abortion policies (n = 178), geographic barriers remained significantly associated with presenting after 10 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, geographically diverse sample, financial and geographic barriers were associated with presenting after the threshold for medication abortion. In supportive states, the association with geographic barriers persisted. Cost and geographic barriers are increasing as more states restrict abortion post-Dobbs, highlighting the urgent need to expand financial and travel support. IMPLICATIONS: People seeking abortion faced barriers before the Dobbs decision. Now, post-Dobbs, restrictions to abortion have only increased, making barriers to care even more threatening. Providing access to financial resources and transportation for people seeking abortion and expanding telehealth medication for abortion is now even more important.

Perspectives on Alternative Models of Medication Abortion Provision Among Abortion Patients in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Restrictions on the availability of medication abortion are a barrier to accessing early abortion. People seeking medication abortion may be interested in obtaining the medications through alternative models. The purpose of this study was to explore patient perspectives on obtaining abortion medications in advance of pregnancy or over the counter (OTC). STUDY DESIGN: Between October 2017 and August 2018, we conducted 30 in-depth interviews with abortion patients who indicated support for alternative models. We recruited patients from 10 abortion clinics in states with a range of policy environments. We analyzed interviews using inductive and deductive iterative techniques. RESULTS: Participants identified logistical benefits of these alternative models, including eliminating travel to a clinic and multiple appointments, and increased privacy around decision-making. Participants were interested in advance provision for its convenience and the sense of preparedness that would come with having the pills available at home, yet some had concerns about the pills being found or stolen. Privacy was the key factor considered for OTC access, including both the privacy benefits of avoiding a clinic and the concern of having one's privacy compromised within the community if purchasing the medications in public. CONCLUSIONS: People who have previously had a medication abortion are interested in alternative methods of provision for reasons concerning convenience, privacy, and avoiding burdens related to hostile policy environments, such as long travel distances to clinics and multiple appointments. Concerns around these models were primarily safety concerns for young people. Further research is needed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of these alternative models of providing medication abortion.

Accuracy of Self-assessment of Gestational Duration Among Adolescents Seeking Abortion Using Information in Addition to Date of Last Menstrual Period.

This diagnostic study evaluates whether using additional information beyond the date of last menstrual period is associated with improved accuracy of self-assessed gestational duration among adolescents seeking abortion.

Feasibility and Acceptability of At-Home Routine Pregnancy Testing in the United States: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the acceptability of regular self-testing among people with increased risk for delayed pregnancy recognition when provided with free at-home pregnancy tests and to explore the feasibility of this intervention among a larger sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2019-2020, we recruited participants across the United States by using flyers posted online and in community settings and abortion clinics. We purposively sampled people with pregnancy capacity who were 18 to 24 years old, had irregular menses, or had a recent second-trimester abortion. Participants were mailed pregnancy tests and instructions. Participants received text message reminders to test monthly over a 3-month period and were asked to text back results. Participants also completed online surveys at baseline, after 1 month, and after 3 months. A purposive subsample of participants was selected to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis of interview guide topics and emergent themes. RESULTS: 61 participants were enrolled. Fifty-four participants (90%) responded to the text reminders and 52 (85%) reported testing in all 3 months. Fifty-eight (95%) said tests were easy to use, 59 (97%) said the results were clear, and all participants found it convenient to text their results. Fourteen participants completed qualitative interviews. All described continuing to test after the study and indicated high acceptability for text reminders. Interviewees described convenience and cost as primary benefits for preferring at-home pregnancy testing. CONCLUSIONS: Regular self-testing and texting results is feasible and acceptable to participants provided with free at-home urine pregnancy tests. These results can inform future studies designed to investigate the effect of regular self-testing on timing of pregnancy detection to facilitate early entry to prenatal care or early abortion.

Prenatal Care as a Gateway to Other Health Care: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Populations with higher rates of being uninsured in the United States have inconsistent access to health care and struggle to find care that fits their needs. For many without access to regular health care, prenatal care can be an entry point for obtaining care related-and unrelated-to pregnancy. We aimed to understand people's lived experience of whether and how pregnancy status enables access to health care unrelated to pregnancy. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of 18 in-depth interviews collected between June 2015 and May 2017 as part of the Multistate Abortion Prenatal Study. Participants were new obstetrics patients at prenatal clinics in southern Louisiana and Baltimore, Maryland. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed using iterative thematic techniques to identify themes related to experiences navigating health care services on entry to prenatal care. MAIN FINDINGS: Most participants were insured through Medicaid, and all participants had low incomes. Pregnancy status enabled access to health insurance for many participants. Prenatal care facilitated access to non-pregnancy-related health care that participants had otherwise been unable to obtain before their current pregnancies. However, entry into prenatal care did not mean all participants' health needs were adequately addressed and some reported ongoing unmet medical needs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to pregnancy as a gateway to health care (and insurance) and, further, illustrate how prenatal care can serve as a gateway to other medical care. Participants' experiences demonstrate how access to health care for women with low incomes can be dependent on pregnancy status, even for non-pregnancy-related health needs.

A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion. METHODS: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: "Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?" We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care. RESULTS: One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12-2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people's consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods.

Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a drug facts label prototype for a combination mifepristone and misoprostol product and to conduct a label-comprehension study to assess understanding of key label concepts. METHODS: We followed U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance, engaged a multidisciplinary group of experts, and conducted cognitive interviews to develop a drug facts label prototype for medication abortion. To assess label comprehension, we developed 11 primary and 13 secondary communication objectives related to indications for use, eligibility, dosing regimen, contraindications, warning signs, side effects, and recognizing the risk of treatment failure, with corresponding target performance thresholds (80-90% accuracy). We conducted individual structured video interviews with people with a uterus aged 12-49 years, recruited through social media. Participants reviewed the drug facts label and responded to questions to assess their understanding of each communication objective. After transcribing and coding interviews, we estimated the proportion of correct responses and exact binomial 95% CIs by age and literacy group. RESULTS: We interviewed 851 people (of 1,507 people scheduled); responses from 844 were eligible for analysis, and 35.7% (n=301) of participants were aged 12-17 years. The overall sample met performance criteria for 10 of the 11 primary communication objectives (93-99% correct) related to indications for use, eligibility for use, the dosing regimen, and contraindications; young people met nine and people with limited literacy met eight of the 11 performance criteria. Only 79% (95% CI 0.76-0.82) of the overall sample understood to contact a health care professional if little or no bleeding occurred soon after taking misoprostol, not meeting the prespecified threshold of 85.0%. CONCLUSION: Overall, high levels of comprehension suggest that people can understand most key drug facts label concepts for a medication abortion product without clinical supervision and recommend minor modifications.

A cross-sectional survey of U.S. abortion patients' interest in obtaining medication abortion over the counter.

OBJECTIVE: To assess abortion patients' perspectives about a hypothetical option to access medication abortion over the counter without a prescription. STUDY DESIGN: From October 2019 to March 2020, people ages 15 and over seeking abortion at 7 facilities across the United States completed a cross-sectional, self-administered survey regarding their personal interest in and general support for accessing medication abortion over the counter, including the advantages and disadvantages of over-the-counter access. We used multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to assess associations between experiencing barriers that led to delay in obtaining abortion care and personal interest in and general support for accessing medication abortion over the counter. RESULTS: Of the 1687 people approached, 1202 (71%) wanted to participate, and 1178 completed the survey. Most people were personally interested in (725/1119, 65%) and in favor of (925/1120, 83%) over-the-counter medication abortion. The most common advantages noted of the over-the-counter model included privacy (772/1124, 69%), earlier access (774/1124, 69%), and convenience (733/1124, 65%). The most common disadvantages noted included incorrect use (664/1124, 59%), not seeing a clinician beforehand (439/1124, 39%), and could be less effective (271/1124, 24%). In adjusted analyses, cost barriers that resulted in delays to the appointment, White race/ethnicity (vs Black), and higher educational attainment were significantly associated with greater personal interest in and support for over-the-counter medication abortion. CONCLUSIONS: People accessing facility-based abortion care are very supportive of and interested in being able to access abortion over the counter. Those facing financial barriers obtaining facility-based care may benefit from allowing medication abortion to be available over the counter without a prescription. IMPLICATIONS: Given people's interest in over-the-counter access to medication abortion, research is needed to assess whether people can use medication abortion appropriately without clinical supervision. Such research could help determine whether medication abortion is suitable for an over-the counter switch.

Accuracy of self-assessment of gestational duration among people seeking abortion.

BACKGROUND: Mifepristone, used together with misoprostol, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for medication abortion through 10 weeks' gestation. Although in-person ultrasound is frequently used to establish medication abortion eligibility, previous research demonstrates that people seeking abortion early in pregnancy can accurately self-assess gestational duration using the date of their last menstrual period. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we establish the screening performance of a broader set of questions for self-assessment of gestational duration among a sample of people seeking abortion at a wide range of gestations. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed patients seeking abortion at 7 facilities before ultrasound and compared self-assessments of gestational duration using 11 pregnancy dating questions with measurements on ultrasound. For individual pregnancy dating questions and combined questions, we established screening performance focusing on metrics of diagnostic accuracy, defined as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity (or the proportion of ineligible participants who correctly screened as ineligible for medication abortion), and proportion of false negatives (ie, the proportion of all participants who erroneously screened as eligible for medication abortion). We tested for differences in sensitivity across individual and combined questions using McNemar's test, and for differences in accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve and Sidak adjusted P values. RESULTS: One-quarter (25%) of 1089 participants had a gestational duration of >70 days on ultrasound. Using the date of last menstrual period alone demonstrated 83.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 78.4-87.9) in identifying participants with gestational durations of >70 days on ultrasound, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.85) and a proportion of false negatives of 4.0%. A composite measure of responses to questions on number of weeks pregnant, date of last menstrual period, and date they got pregnant demonstrated 89.1% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, 84.7-92.6) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.88), with 2.7% of false negatives. A simpler question set focused on being >10 weeks or >2 months pregnant or having missed 2 or more periods had comparable sensitivity (90.7%; 95% confidence interval, 86.6-93.9) and proportion of false negatives (2.3%), but with a slightly lower area under the receiver operating curve (0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.84). CONCLUSION: In a sample representative of people seeking abortion nationally, broadening the screening questions for assessing gestational duration beyond the date of the last menstrual period resulted in improved accuracy and sensitivity of self-assessment at the 70-day threshold for medication abortion. Ultrasound assessment for medication abortion may not be necessary, especially when requiring ultrasound could increase COVID-19 risk or healthcare costs, restrict access, or limit patient choice.

Spatial dimensions of telemedicine and abortion access: a qualitative study of women's experiences.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine may help women comply with onerous legislative requirements for accessing abortion services. In Utah, there are three mandatory steps: a state-mandated information visit, a 72-h waiting period, and finally the abortion procedure itself. We explored women's experiences of using telemedicine for the first step: the information visit. METHODS: We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with women recruited from Planned Parenthood Association of Utah in 2017 and analyzed them using iterative thematic techniques, using a framework based on Massey's conceptualization of space as comprising temporal, material and social dimensions. RESULTS: Temporal, material and social dimensions of women's access to abortion services intertwined to reduce access and cause discomfort and inconvenience among women in our sample. The 72-h waiting period and travel distance were the key temporal and material barriers, while social dimensions included fear of social judgement, religious influence, and negative stereotyping about people who have abortions. Women described traveling long distances alone and risking excessive pain (e.g. denying pain medication in order to drive immediately after the procedure) to try to overcome these barriers. CONCLUSION: Using telemedicine helped patients reduce burdens created by policies requiring attendance at multiple appointments in a state with limited abortion services. Attending to spatial aspects of abortion provision helps identify how these different dimensions of abortion access interact to reduce access and impose undue burdens. Telemedicine can improve privacy, reduce travel expenses, and reduce other burdens for women seeking abortion care.

Women's Experiences Using Telemedicine to Attend Abortion Information Visits in Utah: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Utah requires abortion patients to wait at least 72 hours between attending mandatory information sessions and having an abortion. In 2015, Planned Parenthood Association of Utah began offering telemedicine as a way for patients to attend state-mandated information visits. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' experiences using telemedicine to attend abortion information visits. METHODS: Between April and October 2017, we conducted 18 in-depth interviews with women who used telemedicine to attend state-mandated information visits. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed using iterative thematic techniques to identify themes related to experience and acceptability of telemedicine to attend information visits. MAIN FINDINGS: Women reported telemedicine helped to minimize the burdens of cost, travel, and time associated with attending two in-person visits. Those who lived near a clinic that offered in-person information sessions reported the additional benefit of maintaining privacy by not being seen at the clinic. Overall, women reported that telemedicine was easy to use and felt the nurse was attentive to their emotions over video. A minority of women said they would have preferred an in-person visit, but the burdens of attending in person led them to choose telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study indicate that telemedicine is highly acceptable to patients as a mode of attending state-mandated information visits for abortion. Although telemedicine does not eliminate the logistical and financial burdens previously found to be associated with Utah's 72-hour waiting period and two-visit requirement, telemedicine may reduce the burdens associated with two-visit requirements for abortion and should be adopted in states that require face-to-face information sessions.

Miscarriage information available on the internet: a content analysis of leading consumer websites.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this content analysis was to explore the accuracy and completeness of information provided about miscarriage on consumer-facing websites. STUDY DESIGN: We identified the most popular consumer websites for health information and the leading medical and nursing professional association websites. We reviewed each website for content on miscarriage aimed at consumers and compared the website content to the information contained in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin on Early Pregnancy Loss. We used a simple scoring method to compare the accuracy and completeness of the content on each website with the ACOG Practice Bulletin. RESULTS: Sixty percent (n = 9) of the top 15 consumer websites for health information had dedicated webpages on miscarriage. Of the nine leading professional association websites, two had dedicated pages on miscarriage. On average, each site provided information on 64% of the key messages from the ACOG Practice Bulletin. Sites commonly emphasized and provided overall accurate and complete information on risk factors of miscarriage. The key messages with the most limited or inaccurate information pertained to diagnosis of miscarriage; treatment, including medical management with mifepristone and misoprostol; instructions postmiscarriage and prevention of miscarriage. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of popular health websites include consumer-facing content on miscarriage, and the information presented is a mostly complete and accurate representation of the ACOG Practice Bulletin. The lack of information on treatment options may affect patients' ability to make informed choices about their care. The missing information points to areas that patients may feel underprepared to discuss with healthcare providers. IMPLICATIONS: More effort is needed to ensure that internet-based consumer information about miscarriage reflects the best scientific evidence.